Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Derivation of the User-Oriented Agricultural Drought Assessment Criteria Using the AHP technique

AHP기법을 이용한 수요자 중심의 농업가뭄 영향 평가 기준 도출 연구

  • Lee, Suk-Ju (Rural Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Jae-Do (Rural Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jang, Tae-Il (Rural Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Sul, Dong-Moon (Rural Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Son, Jae-Kwon (Rural Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • 이석주 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 송재도 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 장태일 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 설동문 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 손재권 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.28
  • Accepted : 2018.11.14
  • Published : 2018.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Currently in the drought evaluation, which is a supplier-oriented standard that applies storage rates of reservoirs, evaluation for users that use agricultural water is not done. Therefore, this study established drought evaluation items for drought evaluation based on farmers' judgement, conducted a survey on farmers and experts, compared and analyzed weighted value between two groups, and then classified the evaluation standards per each evaluation item. The agricultural drought evaluation items are 5 major items of water supply lapse rate, agricultural weather, agricultural irrigation facility, crop and soil, and 12 subsections for regional characteristics and opinions of consumers that use water to be reflected. The result of analyzing weighted value of farmers and experts' major items shows that farmers is agricultural irrigation facility(0.219), water supply lapse rate(0.211), agricultural weather(0.204), crop(0.183) and soil(0.183). Experts is agricultural weather(0.297), agricultural irrigation facility(0.202), water supply lapse rate(0.189), crop(0.162) and soil(0.150), which displays difference between the two groups. The agricultural drought criteria standards are established based on precedent studies and cases, and grades of evaluation items are 1st grade(extreme stage), 2nd grade(warning stage), 3rd grade(alert stage) and 4th grade(attention stage). The above analysis per each consumer-oriented agricultural drought evaluation item and the analysis on the standards of evaluation grades are expected to be used as a basic resource for establishing agriculture drought policy and selecting drought area in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun, H. R., 2009, Comparative analysis of the drought diagnosis and related systems, Journal of KOSHAM, Vol. 9(2), pp. 7-18.
  2. Choi. J. H., T. H. Lee, S. W. Kim, Y. C. Shin, 2017, Comparison of Drought Characteristics using RAI and Soil Moisture, Proceedings of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers Conference, Vol. 2017, pp. 237.
  3. Eizo Kinoshita, Takao Oya, 2012, 戦略的意思決定手法 AHP, Cheongram book publishing company, pp. 3-30.
  4. Jang D. H., 2015, A Relative Importance Evaluation for the Perception of Managers on the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, Vol. 21(1), pp. 41-50. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.1.041
  5. KMA, 2016, 2017, Abnormal climate report, 11-1360000-000705-01, Korea Meteorological Administration, pp. 22-30, pp. 23-30.
  6. KMA, 2018, Korea Meteorological Administration, http://kma.go.kr/ (accessed May 27, 2018).
  7. Kim. B. S., J. H. Sung, H. S. Kang, and C. H. Cho, 2012, Assessment of Drought Severity over South Korea using Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index(SPEI), Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 45(9), PP. 887-900. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.9.887
  8. Kim. J. H., S. H. Lee, B. S. Kim, 2018, An Assessment of Past and Future Droughts in North Korea Using Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index, Crisisonomy, Vol. 14(2), 139-151.
  9. Kim. S. J., M. W. Park, S. M. Kang, H. K. Kwon, P. S. Kim, 2017, Comparison of Reservoir Drought Index According to the Period Reservoir Storage Data on Agricultural Reservoir, Agricultural Engineers Conference, Vol. 2017, pp. 71.
  10. KRC, 2017, Statistical yearbook of land water development for agriculture, Korea Rural Community Corporation, pp. 30-57.
  11. KRC, 2017, Current status and countermeasures of drought by si-do (Internal data).
  12. KRC, 2017, Reservoir storage rate of reservoir by si-gun (Internal data).
  13. KRC, 2018, Korea Rural Community Corporation, http://www.alimi.or.kr (accessed July 11, 2018)
  14. Kwon. H. J., H. J. Lim, and S. J. Kim, 2007, Drought Assessment of Agricultural District using modified SWSI, The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 10(1), pp. 22-34.
  15. Lee, S. J., 2018, User-oriented agricultural drought analysis sin AHP techniques, Master Thesis, pp. 1.
  16. Nam. W. H., J. Y. Choi, M. W. Jang, and E. M. Hong, 2013, Agricultural Drought Risk Assessment using Reservoir Drought Index, Crisisonomy, Vol. 14(12), pp. 139-151.
  17. Nam. W. H., Tsegatye Tadesse, Brain D. Wardlow, M. W. Jang, S. Y. Hong, 2015, Satellite-based Hybrid Drought Assessment using Vegetation Drought Response Index in South Korea (VegDRI-SKorea), Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 57(4), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2015.57.4.001
  18. NDIAC, 2018, National Drought Information-Analysis Center, http://drought.kwater.or.kr/ (accessed June 1, 2018).
  19. MOLEG, 2018, Countermeasures Against Natural Disasters Act Enforcement Ordinance, Ministry of Government Legislation, pp. 3.
  20. RDA, Agricultural Weather Information Service, http://weather.rda.go.kr/riskMap.jsp (accessed June 4, 2018).
  21. Son. J. K., 2016, 2017, Development of agricultural drought risk and response management system, Yeongsong publishing company, Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food(IPET), pp. 1-5.