DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Policy Effects of Child Care Leave : Focusing on the childbirth

육아휴직의 정책효과에 관한 분석 : 출산에 미치는 효과를 중심으로

  • Jung, Yuiryong (Dept. of Public Administration, Korea National University of Tranporatation)
  • Received : 2018.07.21
  • Accepted : 2018.09.12
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the policy effects of child care leave focusing on the childbirth in South Korea. This instituion of child care leave orinignally seeks to harmonize the work and family. The instituion is increasingly fortified in the receipants and benefits. This study analyze the policy effect of the institution using difference-in-difference method and Korea Welfare Panel Data. The result of the analysis suggest that substantial expansion of child care leave and family-friendly labor environment rebuilding are important.

본 연구는 육아휴직제도가 출산에 미치는 정책효과에 대한 분석을 수행하였다. 육아휴직제도는 1차적으로 일과 가정의 양립을 취지로 하고 있다. 그러나 출산율 제고의 문제가 부각되면서 육아휴직제도 또한 출산장려책의 일환으로 기대되면서 육아휴직의 대상과 급여 혜택 또한 강화되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 배경 하에서 복지패널 자료를 활용하여 가임기 여성 및 그 배우자의 육아휴직 혜택 이후 출산효과를 이중차분의 방법을 활용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 육아휴직제도의 정책효과는 출산에 관한 한 아직까지 긍정적이지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과는 출산율 제고에 있어서 육아휴직제도의 실질적인 확대 외에 우리나라의 가정친화적인 노동환경 재정립의 필요성을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 한국의 육아휴직제도 수급인원 변화 Figure 1. The Change of the Number of Receipants in Child Care Leave in South Korea

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0002.png 이미지

그림 2. 한국의 육아휴직제도 수급 성별 비중 변화 Figure 2. The Change of Proportion of Recoipants in Child Care Leave in South Korea

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0003.png 이미지

그림 3. 여성의 육아휴직 이용이 출산에 미치는 정책효과 (time: 해당사건이 일어난 시간더미, leave4: 육아휴직 이용여부 tleave4 : 정책효과 변수(time*leave4)) Figure 3. Policy Effect of Maternity Leave: Focusing on the Child Birth

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0004.png 이미지

그림 4. 여성의 육아휴직 이용이 출산에 미치는 정책효과(추가) (time: 해당사건이 일어난 시간더미, leave4: 육아휴직 이용여부 tleave4 : 정책효과 변수(time*leave4)) (통제변수추가: mom_age: 여성연령, mage: 연령제곱, eduyear: 교육년수, hi_eduyear: 남편교육년수, lhincome: 로그(가구소득) Figure 4. Policy Effect of Maternity Leave: Focusing on the Child Birth(extended model)

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0005.png 이미지

그림 5. 남편의 육아휴직 이용이 출산에 미치는 정책효과 (time: 해당사건이 일어난 시간더미, leave4: 육아휴직 이용여부 tleave4 : 정책효과 변수(time*leave4)) Figure 5. Policy Effect of paernity Leave: Focusing on the Child Birth

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_f0006.png 이미지

그림 6. 남편의 육아휴직 이용이 출산에 미치는 정책효과(추가) (time: 해당사건이 일어난 시간더미, leave4: 육아휴직 이용여부 tleave4 : 정책효과 변수(time*leave4)) (통제변수추가: mom_age: 여성연령, mage: 연령제곱, eduyear: 교육년수, hi_eduyear: 남편교육년수, lhincome: 로그(가구소득) Figure 6. Policy Effect of paternity Leave: Focusing on the Child Birth(extended model)

표 1. 한국육아휴직제도의 대상 및 급여의 제도적 변화 Table 1. The Change of Receipant and Benefits in Child Care Laeave in South Korea

GJMGCK_2018_v4n4_145_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. Becker, G. S. A Treatise on The Family (enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1993
  2. Hirschman, C. Why Fertility Changes. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 203-233. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001223
  3. Oppenheimer, V. K. Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293-342 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137521
  4. Butz, W. P, & Ward, M. P The Emergence of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility. American Economic Review, 69, 318-328. 1979.
  5. Heckman, J. J., & Walker, J. R. "The relationship between wages and income and the timing of births: Evidence from Swedish longitudinal data" Econometrica, 58, 1411-1441. 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938322
  6. Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. "Fertility and Women's Employment in Industrialized Nations" Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271 2000. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271
  7. Ahn, Namkee and Pedro Mira. "A Note on the Changing Relationship betweenFertility and Female Employment Rates in Developed Countries," Journal of Population Economics, 15(4). 667-682. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100078
  8. Hoem, B. Entry into motherhood in Sweden: influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986-1997 Demographic Research, 2 2000.
  9. Kravdal, O. The emergence of a positive relation between education and third birth rates in Norway with supportive evidence from the United States. Population Studies, 46, 459-475 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000146456
  10. Hank, K., & Kreyenfeld, M. "A multilevel analysis of child care and women's fertility decisions in Western Germany" Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 584-596. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00584.x
  11. Meyers, M. K., Gornick, J. C., & Ross, K. E. Public childcare, parental leave, and employment. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 117-146). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 1999
  12. Waldfogel, Jane, Yoshio Higuchi, et al."Family Leave Policies and Women'sRetention after Childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan." Journal of Population Economics 12 : 523-545. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050112
  13. Rossin-Slater, Maya, Christopher Ruhm, et al. "The Effects of California's Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers' Leave-Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes." IZA Discussion Paper Series 6240. 2011.
  14. Lalive, Rafael and Josef Zweimuller. "How Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return to Work? Evidence from Two Natural Experiments," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1363-1402. 2009
  15. Kim, Junho. "Parental Leave and Female Labor Supply in Korea" KDI Journal of Economic Policy 34 (1). 169-197 2012. https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2012.34.1.169
  16. Yoon, Ja Young.Hong, Minki. "Effects of the Paid Maternity Leave Policy on Female Employment" Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 14(4), 31-57. 2014.
  17. Cannonier, Colin. "Does the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) IncreaseFertility Behavior?" Journal of Labor Research, 35(2) 105-132. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-014-9181-9
  18. Rossin, Maya. "The Effects of Maternity Leave on Children's Birth and Infant Health Outcomes in the United States," Journal of Health Economics, 30(2), 221-239. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
  19. Rönsen, Marit. "Fertility and Public Policies - Evidence from Norway and Finland," Demographic Research, 10(6), 143-170. 2004. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.10.6
  20. Kim, Inkyung "The Effects of Work-Family Balance Policies in Korea and Policy Implications" KDI Policy Study 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3115959
  21. Duvander, Ann-Zofie, Trude Lappegard, and Gunnar Andersson. "Family Policy andFertility: Fathers' and Mothers' Use of Parental Leave and ContinuedChildbearing in Norway and Sweden," Journal of European Social Policy, 2(1). 45-57. 2010.
  22. Song, Mi-Sook, Park, Kyung-Min "A Phenomenological Study on Experience of the Family Strengths of Married Migrant Women" The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), 4(2) 43-52. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2018.4.2.43