DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Muscle Activity According to Hip Abduction Angle during Hip Extension Exercise in Prone Position

엎드린 자세에서 엉덩관절 폄 운동 시 엉덩관절 벌림 각도에 따른 근활성도 비교

  • Cho, Youn-Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Eulji University) ;
  • Lee, Han-Suk (Department of Physical Therapy, Eulji University) ;
  • Park, Sun-Wook (Department of Physical Therapy of Samsung Medical Center)
  • 조윤호 (을지대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 이한숙 (을지대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박선욱 (삼성의료원 물리치료실)
  • Received : 2018.10.11
  • Accepted : 2018.10.27
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the influence of hip abduction angle on the muscle activity of the Gluteus Maximus (GM), Biceps Femoris (BF) and Tensor Fascia Lata (TFL) during Knee Flexed Prone Hip Extension exercise. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 42 healthy individuals. All participant consented to participate in this study. Subjects performed exercise, using the Knee Flexed Prone Hip Extension exercise in three hip abduction position $0^{\circ}$, $15^{\circ}$ and $30^{\circ}$. Subjects rested two minutes, between changing hip abduction position. Data were analyzed using a Noraxon MR-XP 1.08 Master Edition EMG to determine average amplitude, for each angle and muscle. All data were processed by Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). There were a total of three groups. the GM muscle, BF muscle, TFL muscle. RESULTS: GM muscle activity was greatest in the $30^{\circ}$ hip abduction position (p<.05), followed by $0^{\circ}$. Between $0^{\circ}$ and $30^{\circ}$ has significant difference in muscle activity. However, the BF and TFL amplitude were greatest at $0^{\circ}$ hip abduction position followed by $30^{\circ}$. Moreover, the TFL differed significantly between $0^{\circ}$ and $30^{\circ}$, but, BF did not (p<.05). CONCLUSION: Hip abduction at $30^{\circ}$ was found to be the most appropriate position for GM muscle activity.

Keywords

References

  1. Barker PJ, Hapuarachchi KS, Ross JA, et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of gluteus maximus and the thoracolumbar fascia at the sacroiliac joint. Clinical anatomy. 2014;27(2):234-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22233
  2. Blackburn JT, Bell DR, Norcross MF, et al. Sex comparison of hamstring structural and material properties. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(1):65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.10.001
  3. Cram JR. Introduction to Surface Electromyography. Aspen Publishers. 1998.
  4. Faul F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4): 1149-60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  5. Faul F, Erdfelder, E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  6. Fujisawa H, Suzuki H, Yamaguchi E, et al. Hip muscle activity during isometric contraction of hip abduction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(2):187-90. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.187
  7. Grimaldi A, Richardson C, Durbridge G, et al. The association between degenerative hip joint pathology and size of the gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata muscles. Manual Therapy. 2009;14(6):611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.11.002
  8. Hermens HJB, Freriks C, Disselhorst-Klug G, et al. "Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
  9. Holzwarth U, Cotogno G. Total hip arthroplasty. Brussels: European Commission. 2012.
  10. Janda V, Frank C, Liebenson C. Evaluation of muscular imbalance. Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner's manual. 1996;6:97-112.
  11. Jang SH, Kim SY. Immediate Effect of Hip Joint Exercise Program on Low Back Pain and Performance Level in Amateur Golfers with Chronic Low Back Pain. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2018;13(1):49-62.
  12. Kang SY, Jeon HS, Kwon O, et al. Activation of the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during prone hip extension with knee flexion in three hip abduction positions. Manual therapy. 2013;18(4):303-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.11.006
  13. Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee YW. The Effect of Dual Motor Task Training while Sitting on Trunk Control Ability and Balance of Patients with Chronic Stroke. J Spec Educ Rehabil Sci. 2012;51(2):301-18.
  14. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Muscle activation and movement patterns during prone hip extension exercise in women. J Athl Train. 2009;44(3):238-48. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.3.238
  15. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2013.
  16. Malloy, P, Neumann, DA, Starsky A. Hip Joint Function in People with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Doctor's Degree. Dept. of Clinical and Translational Rehabilitation Health Science. Marquette University. 2017.
  17. Maristella G, Vittoria M, Roberto V, et al. Energy Cost of Walking with Hip Joint Impairment. Physical Therapy. 1990;70(5):295-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/70.5.295
  18. Sakamoto ACL, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Rodrigues P, et al. Gluteus maximus and semitendinosus activation during active prone hip extension exercises. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(4):335-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000045
  19. Schmitz A, Silder A, Heiderscheit B, et al. Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(6):1085-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.008
  20. Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM, et al. Which Exercises Target the Gluteal Muscles While Minimizing Activation of the Tensor Fascia Lata? Electromyographic Assessment Using Fine-Wire Electrodes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(2):54-64. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4116
  21. Seo HJ. The Effects of Pelvic Movements-based Training on Trunk Stability and Balance during Sitting in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2017;12(2):103-11. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.2.103