DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Muscle Activity in Proximal Muscle of Lower Extremities during Lunge according to the Anterior-posterior Distance of Foot Position

런지 동작 시 발 위치의 앞뒤 간격에 따른 하지 근위부 근육의 근 활성도 비교

  • Park, Hoon-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Medicine, Daejeon University) ;
  • Kim, Nan-Hyang (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Cha, Yong-Jun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
  • 박훈영 (대전대학교 보건의료대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김난향 (대전대학교 대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 차용준 (대전대학교 보건의료과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.03
  • Accepted : 2018.11.04
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the muscle activity of the proximal muscles of the lower limb according to the distance between the front and rear foot during lunge and to determine the most effective foot position for activation of the proximal muscle in the limb. METHODS: A total of 49 young adults were enrolled in this study. All subjects performed lunge by positioning the big toe of the back foot and the heel of the front foot at intervals of 40%, 60%, and 80% of the subject's own leg length. Muscle activity of the vastus medialis oblique, rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis oblique (VLO), gluteus medius, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus (ST) was then measured during three intervals of lunge operation. Each operation was measured three times for 10 seconds each, after which the average value was calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: There were significant differences in muscle activities of RF, VLO, and ST among the three intervals of the foot (p<.05). Post hoc, comparisons revealed lunge at 40% intervals resulted in higher RF and VLO activity than at 60% and 80% intervals (p<.05). In the semitendinosus muscle, 80% leg length intervals showed higher muscle activity than 40% (p<.05). CONCLUSION: Strengthening of the proximal muscles of the lower extremities during lunge exercise is considered to be most effective when placing the fore- and rear foot at intervals corresponding to 40% of the leg length.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae SS, Kim HB, Lee SY, et al. A review of patellofemoral angle. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2001;13(1):197-204.
  2. Choi JH. Effect of taping on a home program of hip abductor exercise on pain and quadriceps muscle strength in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2018;13(3):61-6.
  3. Choi NY, Jang HS, Shin YA. The Effect on Muscle Activation in Trunk and Low-limbs during Squat Exercise on Various Instability Surface. Korean J Sport Stud. 2015;54(1):505-14.
  4. Coburn SL, Barton CJ, Filbay SR, et al. Quality of life in individuals with patellofemoral pain: A systemic review including meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2018;33(9):33-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.06.010
  5. Cram J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Aspen Publishers. 1998.
  6. Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, et al. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):723-32. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29
  7. Dixit S, Difiori JP, Burton M, et al. Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):194-202.
  8. Earl JE, Vetter CS. Patellofemoral pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18(3):439-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2007.05.004
  9. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(12):754-62. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2471
  10. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Soderberg GL. Surface electromyographic analysis of exercises for the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(5):247-58. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2003.33.5.247
  11. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4): 556-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199804000-00014
  12. Fredericson M, Yoon K. Physical examination and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(3): 234-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000200390.67408.f0
  13. Gryzlo SM, Patek RM, Pink M, et al. Electromyographic analysis of knee rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1994.20.1.36
  14. Han SW. Effect of rehabilitation exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on visual analysis scale and on functional capacity performed for 8 weeks in a patient with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther Kor. 2004;11(3):33-42.
  15. Jun JH, Park MC. The effect of stair exercise with restriction blood flow on knee extensor muscle. J Korean Soc Med. 2015;10(4):9-14.
  16. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance G, et al. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins. 2005.
  17. Kim HR, Song YJ, Moon SG, et al. The influence of electromyographic activation on gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata by functional leg length discrepancy in women's university students during lunge. Korean Acad Orthop Man Ther. 2013;19(2):39-46.
  18. Krause DA, Cloud BA, Forster LA, et al. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: A comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(3):333-44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.20.3.333
  19. Kuntze G, Mansfield N, Sellers W. A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(2):183-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903428533
  20. Kwon OK, Shin SW. Effects of closed and open kinetic chain exercises on knee extensor strength and balance in patients with early stroke. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2014;9(2):223-31. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2014.9.2.223
  21. Kwon SB, Yi YJ, Han HJ, et al. Leg length inequality, habitual posture, and pain in women's college students. J Muscle Joint Health. 2012;19(1):27-36. https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2012.19.1.027
  22. Kwon YJ, Park SJ, Kim K. The effect of open and closed chain exercise on lower extremity muscle activity in adults. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2012;7(2):173-82. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2012.7.2.173
  23. McCaw ST, Melrose DR. Stance width and bar load effects on leg muscle activity during the parallel squat. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(3):428-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199903000-00012
  24. Park SR, Lee MG, Choi SM. Comparison of electromyographic activity of quadriceps during Lunge according to ankle positions in ssireum players with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Exer Sci. 2010;19(3):219-30. https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2010.19.3.219
  25. Park SY, Kim JW, Nho HS. Vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis electromyographic activities during closed kinetic chain exercises in male athletes with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Korea J Sport Sci. 2008;17(1):487-95.
  26. Suk MH, Wang SY, Shin YA. Effect of electromyographic lower-limb muscle activity in single leg squat motion with loading and various unstable surface. J Coach Devel. 2014;16(3):133-42.
  27. Tang SF, Chen CK, Hsu R, et al. Vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis activity in open and closed kinetic chain exercises in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(10):1441-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26252
  28. Witvrouw E, Cambier D, Danneels L, et al. The effect of exercise regimens on reflex response time of the vasti muscles in patients with anterior knee pain: A prospective randomized intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):251-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00311.x
  29. Yeo SJ, Yoon SD, Park GD. A comparison muscle activity of lower limb muscle for men in their 20s during lunge motion and kettlebell swing. Korean J Sport Sci. 2016;25(5):1219-6.

Cited by

  1. Comparative Study of the Biomechanical Factors in Range of Motion, Muscle Activity, and Vertical Ground Reaction Force between a Forward Lunge and Backward Lunge vol.10, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2021.10.2.98