DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of SW Education Using Robots on Computational Thinking, Creativity, Academic Interest and Collaborative Skill

로봇 활용 SW교육이 초등학생의 컴퓨팅 사고력, 창의성, 학업흥미, 협업능력에 미치는 효과

  • Lee, Jeongmin (Ewha Womans University, Dept. of Educational Technology) ;
  • Park, Hyeonkyeong (Ewha Womans University, Dept. of Educational Technology) ;
  • Choi, Hyungshin (Chuncheon National University of Education, Dept. of Computer Education)
  • 이정민 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 박현경 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 최형신 (춘천교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2017.11.06
  • Accepted : 2017.12.16
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of SW education using robots on Computational Thinking, Creativity, Academic Interest and Collaborative skill. In order to achieve the purpose, SW education using robots was conducted to 88 students in 5th grade in Seoul. After collecting data, we examined mean differences using matched pair t-test. The results indicated that the SW education using robots is associated with significant improvements in Computational Thinking, Creativity and Academic Interest while Collaborative skill is not associated with significant improvement. This research investigated the effects of the SW education using robots and expanded the understanding of the SW education using robots. In addition, this study provides several implications with regard to suggesting the direction to go further of SW education using robots.

본 연구의 목적은 로봇 활용 SW교육이 초등학생의 컴퓨팅 사고력, 창의성, 학업흥미, 협업능력에 미치는 효과를 규명하는데 있다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 A 초등학교에 재학 중인 초등학교 5학년 88명을 대상으로 1학기 동안 로봇 활용 SW교육을 실시하였으며, 수집된 자료는 대응표본 t-검정을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 로봇 활용 SW교육은 초등학생의 컴퓨팅 사고력과 창의성, 학업흥미 향상에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 협업능력은 유의한 향상이 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구는 로봇 활용 SW교육이 초등학생의 인지적 정의적 영역에 미치는 효과를 규명하여 로봇 활용 SW교육에 대한 이해를 확장시키고, 로봇 활용 SW교육이 나아가야할 방향을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의를 지닌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y. (2007). A study of the robot programming instructional strategies considered gender differences. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 10(4), 27-37.
  2. Chai, S., & Chun, S. (2015). The effects of STEAM-based programming education with robot on creativity and character of elementary school students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.159
  3. Han. J., Park, J., Jo, M., Park, I., & Kim, J. (2011). Learning with a robot for STEAM in elementary school curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 15(3), 483-402.
  4. Horn, E., Collier, W., Pxford, J., Bond, C., & Dansereau, D. (1998). Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.153
  5. Hwang, Y., Myn, K., & Park, Y. (2016). Study of perception on programming and computational thinking and attitude toward science learning of high school students through software inquiry activity: Focus on using Scratch and physical computing materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(2), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0325
  6. Jeon, Y., Song, J., & Lee, T. (2008). The impact of robot use in practical arts education on the learner's problem-solving ability. The Society of Korean Practical Arts Education Korea, 14(4), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2008.14.4.209
  7. Kim, H., Ko, Y., Kim, H., & Kim, C. (2015). Effects of PSA programming learning on problem solving ability and logical thinking ability: in the case of high school students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(5), 1-13.
  8. Kim, J., & Kim, D. (2016). Development of physical computing curriculum in elementary schools for computational thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 20(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.1.69
  9. Kim, J., & Kim, T. (2016). The effect of physical computing education to improve the convergence capability of secondary mathematics-science gifted students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(2), 87-98.
  10. Kim, K. (2011). The effects of the robot based instruction on improving immersion learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 14(2), 1-12.
  11. Kim, S., Ham, S., & Song, k. (2015). Analytic study on the effectiveness of computational thinking based STEAM program. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(3), 105-114.
  12. Kim, S., & Lee, C. (2016). The three-year comparative study of effects of STEAM education programs based on physical computing. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 11-18.
  13. Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2015). Development and application of software education program of App Inventor utilization for improvement of elementary school girls' computational thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.31
  14. Lee, E., & Lee, Y. (2008a). The effects of 4CID model based robot programming learning on learners' flow level. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 11(4), 37-46.
  15. Lee, E., & Lee, Y. (2008b). The effects of a robot based programming learning on learners' creative problem solving potential. Korean Institute of Industrial Educations, 33(2), 120-136.
  16. Lee, H., Han, J., & Jo, M. (2013). Effect analysis of learning with a robot for improving creativity in the regular curriculum of elementary school. The Journal of Child Education, 22(2), 19-35.
  17. Lee, J., Jung, Y., & Park, H. (2017). Gender differences in computational thinking, creativity, and academic interest on elementary SW education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.4.381
  18. Lee, J., Song, J., Kim, K., Paik, S., & Lee, T. (2009). The effects of robot programming learning using picocricket on problem solving ability and interest. The Korea Society of Computer Information, 14(2), 17-26.
  19. Lee, J., & Sung, Y. (2011). Development of robot programming education system for children based on storytelling. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 15(2), 295-305.
  20. Lindh. L., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems?. Computers & Education, 49, 1097-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008
  21. Moon, W. (2008). Influential error factors of robot programming learning on the problem solving skill. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 12(2), 195-202.
  22. Moon, W. (2015). The application of the Scratch 2.0 and the sensor boared to the programming education of elementary school. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.149
  23. Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., & Jawaharlal, M. (2015). Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.87
  24. Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2017). The effects of SW education using robot on computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.285
  25. Park, K., & Lee, S. (2010). A comparative study of the effect of dolittle and robot programming education on creativity. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 14(4), 619-626.
  26. Park, S., & Park, J. (1998). Sexual difference analysis on application level of computer programming language. Journal of gender equality studies, 2, 47-68.
  27. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  28. Seo, S., Nam, D., & Lee, T. (2010). The effect of computational thinking ability using text-base vs visual base programming language on robot programming learning. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference, 18(2), 457-462.
  29. Seo, Y., & Lee, Y. (2010). A subject integration robot programming instruction model to enhance the creativity of information gifted students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(1), 19-26.
  30. Seo, Y., Yeom, M., & Kim, J. (2016). Analysis of effect that pair programming develop of computational thinking and creativity in elementary software education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 20(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.3.219
  31. Shim, J., Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2016). A study on gender differences in programming attitude and achievements on physical computing education in informatics curriculum revised 2015. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(4), 1-9.
  32. Shim, K., Lee, S., & Suh, T. (2014). Development and evaluation of a STEAM curriculum utilizing arduino. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(4), 23-32.
  33. Sin, G., & Hur, K. (2011). Development of education program for line-tracer simulation using scratch EPL. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 15(4), 533-542.
  34. Son, J., & Han, K. (2016). Validation of the korean version of Wallach & Kogan creativity test. The Journal of Creativity Education, 16(2), 81-105.
  35. Song, J., Cho, S., & Lee, T. (2008). The effect of learning scratch programming on students' motivation and problem solving ability. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 12(3), 323-332.
  36. Song, J., & Lee, T. (2008). The effect of programming education using pico cricket on improving problem solving ability. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 14(4), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2008.14.4.243
  37. Song, J., Paik. S., & Lee, T. (2009). The effect of robot programming learning considered gender differences on female middle school student's flow level and problem solving ability. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(1), 45-55.
  38. Sung, Y. (2015). The effects of STEAM-based storytelling robotics education on learning attitudes of elementary school girls. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.87
  39. The Korean Ministry of Education (2015). The guidelines for managing software education.
  40. The Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014). The needs and direction towards SW education.
  41. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  42. Yang, C. (2014). Comparison of the effects of robotics education to programming education using meta-analysis. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(3), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.413
  43. Yang, G. (2014). The effect of programming education using hands-on robot on learning motivation and academic achievement of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.575
  44. Yoon, H., & Kim, S. (2001). The effects of cooperative learning applying jigsaw II on learner's self-regulated learning, achievement, self-esteem & cooperation. Journal of Fishries and Marine Scienced Education, 13(2), 194-211.
  45. You, I. (2014). Design a plan of robot programming education using tools of web 2.0. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.499
  46. You, I., & Kim, T. (2006). The effects of MINDSTORMS programming instruction on the creativity. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 9(1), 1-11.
  47. Yu, S., & Kim, T. (2013). The effect of the STEAM-based robot learning on the creativity of elementary IT-gifted students. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 219-236.

Cited by

  1. 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 보조 교사 유무에 따른 컴퓨팅사고력, 로봇에 대한 태도의 차이 vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.307
  2. Development of Project-based Robot Education Program for Enhancing Interest toward Robots and Computational Thinking of Elementary School Students vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2019.24.01.247
  3. 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자 흥미: 햄스터 로봇을 중심으로 vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.85
  4. 초등학교 소프트웨어교육 교육과정 및 교과서의 비판적 검토 및 인식 비교 연구; 전문가 교사와 초보 교사 중심으로 vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2020.24.2.297
  5. 교육용로봇기반 SW융합교육이 초등학생의 컴퓨팅 사고력, 협업능력 및 의사소통능력에 미치는 효과 vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.2.131
  6. 로봇 활용 SW융합교육에서 SW효능감이 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양에 미치는 영향: 흥미와 학습참여의 이중매개효과 vol.20, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.11.001