DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of non-thermal plasma on the shear bond strength of resin cements to Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)

  • Labriaga, Wilmart (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Song, So-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center)
  • Received : 2017.11.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.03
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to assess the effect of non-thermal plasma on the shear bond strength of resin cements to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) in comparison to other surface treatment methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty PEKK discs were subjected to different surface treatments: (1) Untreated (UT); (2) Non-thermal plasma (NTP); (3) Sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ particles (SB); and (4) Sandblasting + Non-thermal plasma (SB+NTP). After each surface treatment, the contact angle was measured. Surface conditioning with Visio.Link was applied in all groups after pre-treatment. RelyX Unicem resin cement was bonded onto the PEKK specimens. After fabrication of the specimens, half of each group (n=10) was initially tested, while the other half was subjected to thermocycling ($5^{\circ}C$ to $55^{\circ}C$ at 10,000 cycles). Shear bond strength (SBS) testing was performed using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were assessed using stereomicroscopy. The SBS results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Independent t-test was used to examine the effect of thermocycling (P<.05). RESULTS. The highest SBS values with or without thermocycling were observed with PEKK specimens that were treated with SB+NTP followed by the SB group. The lowest SBS results were observed in the UT groups. CONCLUSION. The shear bond strength between PEKK and resin cements was improved using non-thermal plasma treatment in combination with sandblasting.

Keywords

References

  1. Domininghaus H. Resin material and its properties, 6. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 1203-22.
  2. Mark H. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology, 3. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 377.
  3. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
  4. Toth JM, Wang M, Ester BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB, Turner HS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006;27:324-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011
  5. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2014;30:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
  6. Han KH, Lee JY, Shin SW. Implant- and Tooth-Supported Fixed Prostheses Using a High-Performance Polymer (Pekkton) Framework. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:451-4. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4688
  7. Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE, Kim JH, Lee WC, Shin SW, Lee JY. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Tooth Restored with High Performance Polymer PEKK Post-Core System: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1373127.
  8. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32:441-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-011
  9. Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater 2014;30:e209-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011
  10. Noiset O, Schneider YJ, Marchand-Brynaert J. Adhesion and growth of CaCo2 cells on surface-modified PEEK substrata. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2000;11:767-86. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856200744002
  11. Chen M, Zhang Y, Sky Driver M, Caruso AN, Yu Q, Wang Y. Surface modification of several dental substrates by non-thermal, atmospheric plasma brush. Dent Mater 2013;29:871-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.002
  12. Rodriguez-Villanueva C, Encinas N, Abenojar J, Martinez M.A. Assessment of atmospheric plasma treatment cleaning effect on steel surfaces. Surf Coat Technol 2013;236:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.10.036
  13. Comyn J, Mascia L, Xiao G, Parker BM. Plasma-treatment of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 1996;16:97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(96)89798-3
  14. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 2010;26:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003
  15. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Keul C. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1278-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014
  16. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1209-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
  17. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:465-72.
  18. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hammerle C. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 2012;258:7213-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.040
  19. Pourkhalili H, Dastjerdi MR, Soltankarimi V, Razavi AS, Ramezani A, Talari FS, Alhavaz A. Effect of different surface treatment on the shear bond strength of veneering composite to polyetherketone core material. Int J Adv Biotech Res 2016;7:1116-21.
  20. Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 2012;28:1280-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010
  21. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:383-92.
  22. Stawarczyk B, Taufall S, Roos M, Schmidlin PR, Lumkemann N. Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:763-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x
  23. Yavirach P, Chaijareenont P, Boonyawan D, Pattamapun K, Tunma S, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effects of plasma treatment on the shear bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite posts and resin composite for core buildup. Dent Mater J 2009;28:686-92. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.686
  24. Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Jahn D, Schmidlin PR. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:163-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7
  25. Pelagade S, Singh NL, Shah S, Qureshi A, Rane RS, Mukherjee S, Deshpande UP, Ganesan V, Shripathi T. Surface free energy analysis for bipolar pulsed argon plasma treated polymer films. J Phys 2010;208:012107.
  26. Kim S, Lee KJ, Seo Y. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surface functionalization by low-energy ion-beam irradiation under a reactive O2 environment and its effect on the PEEK/copper adhesives. Langmuir 2004;20:157-63. https://doi.org/10.1021/la035396h
  27. Stawarczyk B, Silla M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Lumkemann N. Bonding behaviour of polyetherketoneketone to methylmethacrylate-and dimethacrylate-based polymers. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:331-8.
  28. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:265-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027
  29. Nair K, Whiteside B, Grant C, Patel R, Tuinea-Bobe C, Norris K, Paradkar A. Investigation of plasma treatment on micro-injection moulded microneedle for drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 2015;7:471-85. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics7040471
  30. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:e100-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
  31. Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Hardness development of dual-cured resin cements through different thicknesses of ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006;25:132-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.132

Cited by

  1. 복합레진 인레이의 표면처리방법에 따른 표면특성 비교 vol.19, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190017
  2. Influence of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Shear Bond Strength between Y-TZP and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement vol.12, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203321
  3. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.75
  4. Influence of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Retentive Strength between Zirconia Crown and Titanium Implant Abutment vol.14, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092352
  5. Enhanced adhesion between PEEK and stainless-steel mesh in resistance welding of CF/PEEK composites by various surface treatments vol.33, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/09540083211001115
  6. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of PAEKs to composite resin vol.35, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1889840