Journal of Internet Computing and Services (인터넷정보학회논문지)

Korean Society for Internet Information (한국인터넷정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research on Value Chain Structure on Experience of VR and AR Focused on Means-End Chain Theory on VR and AR

가상현실 미디어 체험이 가치사슬구조형성에 미치는 영향 연구 VR-AR 수단-목적 사슬이론 적용 중심으로

  • Kweon, Sang Hee (The Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communication, Sungkyunkwan Univ.)
  • Received : 2017.08.07
  • Accepted : 2017.12.06
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research explores a value chain structure of VR-AR media including user's perception, uses, and evaluation. The purpose of this research focused on factor analysis and the relationship among user's VR-AR adoption motivations and utilities. This research explores correlation between personal value and using motivation. This study was to identify the value structure of respondent on VR-AR usages based on means-end chain theory. The research used structured APT laddering questions and 251 data was analysed. Through such analysis, category difference by stage and relationship difference were identified and hierarchical value map was compared. There are four different value ladders: first is attributes, functional consequences, psychological consequences, and final value. This study is based on the analysis of the value chain structure factors that affect VR and AR use behavior (attributes, functional benefits, psychological benefits, use value), 'Hierarchical Value Map' between users' The purpose of the model is to construct a model. For this, 'means-end chain theory' was applied to measure the causal relationship between personal value and VR related use behavior. In order to solve this research problem, 135 people were analyzed through the structured questionnaire using the AR and VR content fitness measure and the second APT laddering, and the use of VR-AR : 1) Functional benefits; 2) Psychological benefits; 3) Means to reach value, 4) Objective value chain structure was identified. The results show that VR users tried to smooth the social life through the new virtual reality audiovisual element, the newness of experience, fun, and pleasure through the departure of reality, vividness of experience, and leading fashion. The AR fitness was a game and a new program, and the value of interacting with other people and the value of 'periwinkle' played an important role through the vividness and peripheral interaction of AR, It was an important choice. The important basic values of users' VR and AR selection were correlated with psychological attributes of interaction with others, achievement, happiness and favorable values.

본 연구는 VR-AR 체험(Experiential Uses) 행위과정에 나타난 가치단계 요인을 분석(속성, 기능적 혜택, 심리적 혜택, 사용가치), 이용자의 체험 과정에 나타난 욕구와 이용행위 간의 '가치단계도(HVM : Hierarchical Value Map)'에 관한 모형을 구성하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 '수단-목적 사슬 이론(means-end chain theory)'를 적용, 개인적 VR-AR 경험에 나타난 가치사슬을 측정하였다. 본 연구문제를 해결하기 위하여 1차로 AR-VR 콘텐츠 적합도 측정과 2차로 APT래더링을 활용한 구조화 된 설문지를 통하여 135명의 자료를 분석하여 VR-AR 관련 미디어 이용 선택의 '속성'- '기능적 혜택'- '심리적 혜택'- '이용 가치'에 이르는 수단-목적 가치사슬 구조를 파악한 후 가치단계도(HVM)로 VR-AR체험 가치 관계를 실증할 수 있었다. 연구결과, VR 이용자들은 새로운 가상현실 시청각 요소를 통해 현실이탈, 체험의 생생함, 유행선도를 통하여 새로운 성취감, 재미와 즐거움을 통하여 사회생활을 원활히 하고자 하였다. AR이 가지는 생생함과 주변 상호작용을 통하여 자아실현, 타인과 상호작용에 가치를 두고 있으며,'주변인'의 영향이 크게 작용하였고 이들과의 상호작용이 중요한 선택 목적이었다. 이용자들의 VR-AR 선택의 중요 가치는 타인과 상호작용 증진이며 성취감, 행복과 우호적인 가치 속성도 중요하게 고려되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sang-Hee Kweon, Min-Kyung Cha, A Research on Value Chain Structure on TV Programs:: Focused on Means-End Chain theory on News, Drama, and Comedy, Korean Journal of Communication & Information, Vol.71 No.- [2015], pp.194-223, http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE0635 6161
  2. Seok Kim, Jin Hwi Lee, Ja Young Choi, Yong-soo Kim, Virtual Training System for Blast Furnace Casting, The Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, Vol.2015 No.6 [2015], pp.989-990 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100640461
  3. Sung-Tae Kim, Yu Won Oh, Sun Young Park, Attributes, Consequences, Values of Internet-Mediated Agenda Rippling : Focusing on the Results of Laddering Method, Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, Vol.21 No.3 [2007], pp.127-162 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76333487
  4. Jun-Hee Kim, Viewership of Television Drama, Korean society for the scientific study of subjectivity, Vol.3 No.- [1998], pp.62-84 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100825042
  5. Hong-Kyu Kim, Value systems and consumption belief among Korean consumers, The Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol.9 No.4 [1998], pp.57-82 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75216741
  6. Eun-Kyung Na, Genre-specific Cultivation Effects of TV Programs : Cultivating Viewers' Citizenship and Value Attitudes, (The Korea Contents Society, Vol.13 No.7 [2013], pp.150-157 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99679338 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.07.150
  7. Chong-Jong Park, Dong-hyun Kim, Virtual Reality System for the HCI's Current Situation and Development Trend, the Korean Information Processing Academic Conference, Vol.5 No.1 [1998], pp.20-28 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19681277
  8. Hwa-Jin Park, Se-Hong Jo, The Case Study on the Input Type of Virtual Reality System on Technology, the Korean Information Processing Society review, vol.10, no.1 2003,pp.64-73 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30085603
  9. Hee-Jung Baek, Great Root Woods, A Television Comedy Program Audience Research : Focusing on the Gag Concert, Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents, Vol.- No.9 [2012], pp.77-110 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99722766
  10. Won-Byeon Kyung, An Study of Serious Sports Game Selection Attributes, Functional Benefits, Psychological Benefits and Value: In Screen Golf Practice Range, Korean Society for Sports Management, Vol. 17 No. 3 (2012), pg. 99, 13 p. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100325663
  11. Ki-In Song, The Comparison of the Hierarchical Value Map from Smartphone User's Involvement, Social Science Research Review, Vol.28, No.4, (2012), pp303-328 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99531225
  12. Mi-seon Shim, Eun-mee Kim, June Woong Rhee, Lifestyle, Multiple Media Use, and Cross-media Genre Use, Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, Vol.52 No.6 [2008], pp.189-216 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76333603
  13. Moon-hee Yang, Influence of Personality Types on Television Contents Preference, The Korea Contents Association, Vol.11 No.12 [2011], pp.230-240 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100398848
  14. Su-jin Lee, Experience of virtual reality and reciprocity of the real world, Korea Information Strategy Development Institute, Vol.2004, No.14, http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75071172
  15. Seung-Eun Lee, Han Hagchin, Chun Hejin, An Application of Means-End Chain Theory for Analysis of Wine Enthusiasts' Value Pursuit Model, The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, Vol.23 No.3 [2011], pp.425-442 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82573533
  16. Jang-Han Lee, Virtual Reality and Psychology, Korean Journal of Psychology: General, Vol.23 No.2 [2004], pp.87-104 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100631309
  17. Jong-Kwan Lee, The Metaphysics and Ethics of Virtual Reality, Korean Philosophical Association, Vol.54 No.- [1998], pp.319-350 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A79834459
  18. Chang- Min Lee, Virtual Reality and Human Interface, Korea Multimedia Society,Vol.1 No.1 1998,77-78 pp11 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82542803
  19. Hee-Seung Lee, Korean Local Characteristics of Real Variety and Pleasure of Reception , Korea Regional Communication Research Association, Vol.11 No.3 [2011], 207-237
  20. Boo-Yeon Jang, Virtual Reality (VR) Ecosystem Status and Implications, Korea Information Society Development Institute, Vol. 28 No. 7 (2016) pg. 1, 23 p.
  21. Whan-seng Chen, A Study on the Audience's Brain Responses to Media Contents Types Through EEG: Applied to Neuroscientific Methods, Korean journal of social science), Vol.33 No.2 [2011], pp.245-282 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77010681
  22. Hag Chin Han, Seong Seop Kim, Research Articles : A Study on Birdwatching Experts' Value Pursuit Using the Hard Laddering Method, The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, Vol.31 No.3 [2007], pp.31-54 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102060820
  23. Seung-Hoon Hyun, A Subjectivity Study on Audience for Television Programme Viewing Motivation - Focused on Imported Television Drama, Dongguk University Media Center, Vol.- No.16 [2013], pp.59-90 http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99747872
  24. Dong-Hoon Jung, Understanding virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed realities, Newspapers and broadcasting, Vol. 2016.11
  25. John Dewey, [Art as Experience ], Book World, 2003.1.30.
  26. Helsel Sandra, [Virtual reality theory practice and promise], Sejong University, 1994.12.1. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M942528
  27. Jung Min Kyoung, [Let's experience solitary the vivid VR. Is the live broadcasting possible? ], Today Media, 2016.09.11
  28. Antonides, G., & VanRasij, W.F. (1998). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective. New York: United States of America. John Wiley and Sons.
  29. Baudrillard J., (1994) Simulacra and Simulation:The Body, In Theory: Histories of Cultural Materialism, New York: University of Michigan Press.
  30. Beatty, S. E.‧Kahle, L. R.‧Homer, P.‧Misra, S.(1985). Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey, Psychology and Marketing, 2(3), pp 181-200. https://goo.gl/F95pmu https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220020305
  31. Biocca F. and F. Levy (1995) Communication in the Age of VR https://goo.gl/EZxwMC
  32. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorisation processes. Hag Chin Han, Seong Seop Kim Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 60-72. https://goo.gl/gJe3jx https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  33. Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 143-148. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0148296 391900483 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90048-3
  34. Gutman, J. (1982). A Means-end Chain Model Based on Customer Categorization Processes, Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72. https://goo.gl/gJe3jx https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  35. Huber, F., Beckmann, S. C. & Herrmann, A.(2004). Means-end analysis : Does the affective state influence information processing style. Psychology & Marketing, 21(9), 715-737. https://goo.gl/2QCByp https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20026
  36. Kahle, L. R.(1983). Social value and social change : Adaption to life in America. New York : Praeger.
  37. Kahle, L. R., Beatty, S. E. & Homer, P. (1986). Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: the list of values (LOV) and values and life style (VALS). Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 405-409. https://goo.gl/wm2U78 https://doi.org/10.1086/209079
  38. Heeter, C. & Baldwin, T. F. (1988). Channel type and viewing styles. In Heeter, C. & Greenberg, B. S.(Eds). Cableviewing. 167-176, Norwood: NJ. Ablex.
  39. Katz, E. (1959). Mass communication research and the study of culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.
  40. Katz, E. (1987). Communication research since Lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 525-545.
  41. Krueger, M. W. (1991). Artificial reality: Past and future. In SK Helsel, JP Roth (Eds.), Virtual Reality: Theory, Practiсe and Promise(pp. 19-26). Westport, London: Meckler, 19-26.
  42. Levy, M. R. & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience Activity and Gratifications: A Conceptual Clarification. Communication Research, 11(1), 51-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365084011001003
  43. Miyazaki, T. (1981). Housewives and daytime serials in Japan: A uses and gratifications perspective. Communication Research, 8, 323-341. http://goo.gl/TAmZom https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028100800304
  44. Neuman, J. (1991). The future of the mass audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://goo.gl/4z7xmg
  45. Olson, J, C., & Reynolds, T. J. (2001). The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. Understanding Consumer Decision Making, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-01229-000
  46. Olson, J. C., Reynolds, T. J.(2001). The Means-End Approach to Understanding Consumer Decision Making, In Lawrence Erlbaum Associates(Eds.), Understanding Consumer Decision Making, 3-20, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
  47. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of Human values. NY: Free Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2149267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
  48. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2005). Consumer behaviour and marketing strategy (7th ed.). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill. https://goo.gl/nsHVes
  49. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. IL: Springer-Verlag. http://www.springer.com/cn/book/9781461293781
  50. Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television: a discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6, 155-180. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/009365027900600203
  51. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L.A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: a study of television news. Communication Research, 7, 161-192. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/009365028000700202
  52. Peter, J. P.Olson, J. C.(2005). Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Strategy. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/7984732
  53. Pine, B. J. II, & Gilmore, J. H.(1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is theater & Every Business a stage, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/619718.The_Experience_Economy
  54. Reynolds, J. & Gutman, J.(1984). Advertising is image management. Social Journal of Advertising Research, 24(1), 27-36.
  55. Reynolds,T.J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, methods, analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31.
  56. Reynolds, T. J., & Whitlark, D. B. (1995). Applying laddering data to communications strategy and advertising practice. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 9-17.
  57. Rokeach, M.(1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York : The Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/53.4.659
  58. Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 27(1), 37-51. https://goo.gl/5qxa8M https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158309386471
  59. Shneiderman, Ben. (1992) Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG) 11(1): 92-99 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=115768 https://doi.org/10.1145/102377.115768
  60. Ter Hofstede, F., Audenaert, A., Steenkamp, J-B E. & Wedel, M.(1998). An investigation into the association pattern technique as a quantitative approach to measuring means-end chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(97)00029-3
  61. Valette-Florence, P., & Rapacchi, B. (1991). Improvements in means-end chains analysis: using graph theory and correspondence analysis. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 31, 30-45.
  62. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/208520