DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Frequency Analysis of Teacher's Emotional Response in Mathematics Class

수학 담화에서 나타나는 교사의 감성적 언어 빈도 분석

  • Son, Bok Eun (Graduation of Ajou University) ;
  • Ko, Ho Kyoung (Department of Mathematics Graduate School of Education, Ajou University)
  • Received : 2018.10.08
  • Accepted : 2018.11.24
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the emotional language of math teachers in math class using text mining techniques. For this purpose, we collected the discourse data of the teachers in the class by using the excellent class video. The analysis of the extracted unstructured data proceeded to three stages: data collection, data preprocessing, and text mining analysis. According to text mining analysis, there was few emotional language in teacher's response in mathematics class. This result can infer the characteristics of mathematics class in the aspect of affective domain.

본 연구는 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 활용하여 수학수업에서 나타나는 교사의 감성적 언어를 확인하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 우수 수업 동영상을 활용하여 수업에서 발생하는 교사의 수업 언어 데이터를 수집하였다. 추출한 비정형 데이터에 대한 분석 과정은 데이터 수집, 데이터 전처리, 텍스트 마이닝 분석의 세 가지 단계로 진행하였다. 분석 결과 수학 수업에서 오고가는 담화 중에서 교사의 감성적 반응을 나타내는 언어는 거의 나타나지 않았으며, 이를 통해 수업의 정의적 영역 측면에서의 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0001.png 이미지

[그림 III-1] 연구 세부 절차

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0002.png 이미지

[그림 II-2] 전사내용과 구글독스 활용 비교

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0003.png 이미지

[그림 III-3] 언어 빈도에 따라 워드 클라우드로 시각화한 내용

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0004.png 이미지

[그림 4] 초등학교 수업 전사 내용의 일부

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0005.png 이미지

[그림 IV-1] 교사수업 언어[초등학교]

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0006.png 이미지

[그림 IV-2] 교사수업 언어[중학교]

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0007.png 이미지

[그림 IV-3] 중학교 수업 전사 내용의 일부

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0008.png 이미지

[그림 IV-4] 교사수업 언어[고등학교]

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0009.png 이미지

[그림 IV-5] 고등학교 수업 전사 내용의 일부

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_f0010.png 이미지

[그림 IV-6] 교사수업언어[전 학교급]

<표 II-1> 기본감정 및 학업감성 유형

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_t0001.png 이미지

<표 III-1> 데이터 수집 내용

SHGHFM_2018_v32n4_555_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Ko, S., Kang, H. (2007). Developing Mathematics Concepts through Discourse in a Math Classroom. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education, 46(4), 423-443.
  2. Ko, H., Choi. Y., Park, S. (2014). Study on Big Data Utilization Plans in Mathematics Education. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education, 28(4), 573-588.
  3. Minstry of Education. Primary and secondary school Curriculum Overview. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [Separate issue 1].
  4. Kwon, G., Choi, M. (2013). A Comparison Study between Excellent Classes & Regular Classes of Elementary Schools Using the Flanders Interaction Analysis System. The Journal of Child Education, 22(2), 37-51.
  5. Kim, K., Baek, J. (2013). Development of Verbal Analysis Program and Tools for Supporting of Special Education. The Korean Association For Thinking Development, 9(3), 119-140.
  6. Kim, S., Kim, E. (2013). Analysis of classroom language patterns used by pre-service teachers in microteaching. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 195-217.
  7. Kim, S. (2006). Kim, S., Kim, E. (2013). Analysis of classroom language patterns used by pre-service teachers in microteaching. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 6(2), 97-114.
  8. Kim, S., Lee, C. (2003). Mathematical language levels of middle school students. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(2), 123-141.
  9. Kim, S. (1980). A STUDY ON TEACHER'S VERBAL PATTERN. Master's Thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  10. Kim, J. (2001). Learning conversation centered on student activities in Moral Education. Journal of moral education studies, 2, 1-26.
  11. Kim, Y. (2014). A qualitative Study on Excellent History Classes in the Elementary Social studies. Master's Thesis. Cheong-ju National University of Education, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
  12. Kim, W., Kim, Y. (2005). (A) Case study on reflections of mathematics teachers's questioning. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education, 19(1), 191-213.
  13. Kim, E., Park, H., Kim, J. (2010). The role of positive emotion in education. Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility, 13(1), 225-234.
  14. Kim, E., Oh, Y. (2012). The Effects of Mathematics Instruction Using Chilldren's Lierature on Mathematical Communication. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 16(1), 97-124.
  15. Kim, J. (2012). Big data Utilization and related Technique and Technology Analysis. The Korea Contents Association, 10(1), 34-40.
  16. Kim, J., Park, M. (2015). A Study on the Effects of Teaching Mathematics for Social Justice on Students' Interests and Recognition of Values in Mathematics. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 1(3), 409-434.
  17. Kim, J. (2017). Keyword and topic analysis on the college and university structural reform evaluation using big data. Ph.D.Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  18. Kim, J. (2015). Sensibility-Based Understanding of the Self-Efficacy and Brain-Scientific Implications. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  19. Kim, J., Cho, J. (2017). Brain-Scientific Understanding of the Emotion-intervened Self-Efficacy and Directions of the Teaching and Learning. The Journal of Elementary Education, 30(1), 73-95.
  20. Kim, H. (2013). Verification of Relationships among Emotional Intelligence, Academic Self-efficacy and Creative Personality in Elementary School Students. Master's Thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  21. Kim, H., Lee, N. (2016). Exploring the Pre-service Science Teachers' Emotional Experience, Display Rules, and Controlling Strategies During Teaching Practice. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(2), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0231
  22. Noh, K. (1999). A Study of Class Language in teacher-student interaction. The Korean Society for Sociology of Education, 9(2), 97-119.
  23. Park, G. (2010). A Case Study on Instruction for Mathematically Gifted Children. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(3), 655-679.
  24. Park, Y. (2011). Reporting the Activities of Professional Development System for Enhancing Elementary Mathematical Teaching Professionalism. The journal of Mathematics Education, 25(1), 47-61.
  25. Pang, J. (2011). Prospective Teachers' Analysis and Conception of Elementary Mathematics Instruction. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 15(20), 221-246.
  26. Pang, J., Kwon, M., Kim, J. (2012). An Analysis of the Characteristics of Effective Mathematics Instruction in the Elementary School. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 16(3), 403-426.
  27. Seo, G. (2004). Perspectives and Concepts of Good Instruction: Teacher-student Interview. The Korean Society Of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 165-187.
  28. Seo, H. (2008). The Method and Perspective on Observation of Korean Language Class. The Association of Korean Education, 38, 160-184.
  29. Shin, B. (2014). A Study about Characteristics of Teachers' Analysis of an Instruction : Focused on Teachers' Knowledge for Teaching Statistics. School Mathematics, 16(3), 519-542.
  30. Thomas Gordon(1987). Teacher effectiveness training. Seoul: Sungwonsa.
  31. Shin, J. (2007). An Analysis on Communication in a Math Class - Based on Verbal Interactions -. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 10(1), 15-28.
  32. Shin, H. (2015). The Study of Expert Survey on Korean language teachers of language and action elements that appear in "excellent lesson". Korea Reading Association, 35, 173-194.
  33. Ahn, G., Lee, K. (2001). The Relationship between Elementary School Teachers' Beliefs about Mathematics and Teaching Practices. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 5, 121-142.
  34. Yang, M. (1999). A critical understanding of the teacher's questioning : its characteristics and the roles. The Choong-Won Review of Humanities, 20, 61-79.
  35. Lee, M. (2003). (An) analysis of the kindergarten english class using the Flanders' category system. Master's Thesis. Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  36. Lee, S. (2003). The Korean language education and the instructional conversations analysis. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 5, 115-132.
  37. Lee, S. (2005). An Investigation on the Writing's Teaching Language as Curriculum Genre. The Association of Korean Education, 28, 177-220.
  38. Lee, Y., Koh, S. (1999). Weaving: A Form of Responsive Teacher Talk. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 151-170.
  39. Chang, Y., Choi, J. (2015). Effects of Mathematics teaching Using Story on Learning Achievements and Mathematical Attitudes. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 19(2), 231-250.
  40. Jeon, S., Cho, C. (2015). A Study on the Written Texts of a High School Mathematics Textbook and Teacher's Classroom Discourse - A Focus on 'The Relationship between Quadratic Functions and Quadratic Equations' -. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 25(4), 525-547.
  41. Cho, K. (2011). The Effects of Nonverbal Communication of Teachers on Participation in Instruction and Academic Achievement Help. Korea Association Of Educational Information & Broadcasting, 17(3), 261-282.
  42. Cho, K., Lee, J. (2015). Teachers' Experience and Feeling/Emotion on Students' Nonverbal Communication Behaviors in Class. The Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education, 32(1), 89-118.
  43. Cho, W., Oh, Y. (2010). (The)Relationship between teacher's role to interaction patterns in mathematics classrooms. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1-22.
  44. Cho, J., Lee, B. (2001). The Human Brain Mechanism of ' Emotion ' and Directions of Emotion Education in the Elementary School. The Journal of Elementary Education, 14(3), 391-410.
  45. Cho, H. (1998). A Correlational Study on the Relationship between learning Environment and Psychological Variables. Journal of the Institute of Humanities & Social Sciences, 27, 171-198.
  46. Seo, K. (2004). The perspectives and conceptions about good instructional practice: An interview study of teachers and students. The Korean Society Of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 165-187.
  47. Cheon, H., SAARARANI, M, SHIBATA, Y., SAKAMOTO, M. (). Towards Possibility and Prospect of Cross-cultural Lesson Analysis - Focus on Methodology of Comparison as Lens -. The Society of Korea and Japan Education, 22(1), 107-125.
  48. Hong, W., Pang, J. (2008). An Analysis of Teacher-Student Communication and Students' Mathematical Thinking in Sixth Grade Mathematics Classrooms. The Journal of Korean School Mathematics Society, 11(2), 201-219.
  49. Hong, J. (1999). On the Meaning of 'Activity' in Mathematical Cognition. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 9(1), 151-164.
  50. Huh, Y. (2013). A Study on Patterns of Teachers' Verbal Languages and Measuring the Utilization of Each Type. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2013.29.2.1
  51. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  52. Capenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teacher' Pedagigical content knowledge of students' problem sonving in elementary arithmetic, Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 19(5), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/749173
  53. Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. D. G. (1987). Investigating classroom talk. Philadelpia, PA: The Falmer Press.
  54. Hannelotte, L. T., Sylke, W. M. & Johannes E. H. (2017). The relation between math self-concept, test and math anxiety, achievement motivation and math achievement in 12 to 14-year- old typically developing adolescents. Psychology, Society, & Education, 9(1), 89-103. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143458035.pdf https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v9i1.465
  55. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior : MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  56. John Withall. (1949). 'The development of a Technique for the Measurement of Social-Emotional Climate in Classroom', MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  57. Koven, N. S. (2011). Specificity of metaemotion effects on moral decisionmaking. Emotion, 11(5), 1255-1261 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025616
  58. Newman, F & Holtzman, L. (1993). Lev Vigotsky: Revolutionary Scientist. London: Routledge.
  59. Son.J.J.(2011). A study on emotion labro f elementary school teachers. The Korea Education Review, 17(3), 93-127.
  60. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind and Society(pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Ma: Harvard University.