Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Facebook Advertisement Message's Convergence Type and SNS Trait on Brand Attitude, Purchasing Intention

페이스북 광고메시지의 융합형태와 SNS속성이 브랜드태도 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향

  • Jeong, Chang-Jun (Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Cheongju University)
  • 정창준 (청주대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.16
  • Accepted : 2018.03.20
  • Published : 2018.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Three types of Ad message convergence, A Letter, B Letter+Photo, C Letter+Photo+Video on the Facebook advertising were researched. For this research, three types of sample advertisements were tested on the 230 subjects. And the H1 - How do three types of advertisements differ on the SNS main trait, H2 - Among those Informativity, Reliablity, Playfulness, Intractivity as the SNS main trait, what is the more powerful factor on the brand attitude / Purchase Intention. For this research the ANOVA, Scheffe, Regression Analysis was used. As a result, H1 - The effect power of Playfulness and Interactivity on the three types of Ad message convergence ranked as "A

페이스북 광고 메시지에서 메시지 구성요소의 세 가지 형태인 A문자, B문자+사진, C문자+사진+동영상의 융합형태는 SNS의 주요 속성들에서 어떤 영향의 차이를 보이는가를 연구문제로 설정하였다. 연구절차는 A, B, C 세 가지 Type으로서 모바일에 적용가능한 광고샘플을 제작하여 230명의 피험자들에게 노출시키고, 제1가설에서 SNS의 주요 속성인 정보성, 신뢰성, 유희성, 상호작용성에서 각각 다른 차이를 보일 것인가를 ANOVA, Scheffe 사후분석으로 검증하였다. 제2가설은 SNS 주요 속성요소는 A, B, C 세 가지 광고메시지 융합유형에서 주요 영향력 요소가 무엇인지를 회귀분석으로써 확인하였다. 연구결과 제1가설에서는 A, B, C 세 가지 광고메시지 융합형태에서 유희성과 상호작용성은 A

Keywords

References

  1. C. J. Jeong. (2017). Advertising Creative Based on Media Trait. Korea Journal of Social Science, 38(2).
  2. S. Y. Lee. (2015). A Study of College Students' Intention to Avoid Facebook Usage. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 32(4).
  3. S. Chen. Y. Diao & J. Zhang. (2011). Social media: Communication Characteristics and Application Value in Distance Education. Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 2011 International Conference on, 16-18(9).
  4. Y. Choi & S. H. Park. (2011). The Effect of Social Media Usage on Social Capital. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies. 25(2).
  5. C. Saransomrurtai. (2011). Converting a social network into a brand network: Howbrand profile on Facebook is used as an online marketing communication tool, A dissertation submitted to Auckland University of Technology in patial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Business.
  6. E. S. Lee & Y. S. Lim. (2012). Exploring Marketing Communication Strategy Using Facebook in South Korea the Semantic Network Analysis of Communication Messages. Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 14(3).
  7. A. Lipsman. G. Mudd. M. Rich & S. Bruich. (2010). The power of 'Like': How brands reach (and influence) fans through social-media marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 40-52.
  8. H. S. Yang, J. H. Kim & M. H. Seo. (2012). Does Facebook Enrich Our Social Relation. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 56(5).
  9. D. C. An & S. H. Kim. (2012). Attitudes toward SNS Advertising. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 23(3).
  10. J. Y. Kim, S. U. Whang. (2014). Cross Cultural Comparison of Coporate Social Responsibility Message Strategy between Korean Corporate Facebook Sites and American Sites. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 25(2).
  11. J. Y. Ko, H. K. Kim & S. J. Yoon. (2014). A Study on the Effect of Message Direction and Characteristics in e-WOM. Journal of Service Marketing, 7(1).
  12. S. W. Shim & W. H. Kim. (2011). A Study on the Effects of College Students' Use Motives of Social Media on Avertisement Uses. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 13(2).
  13. S. H. Lim, E. M. Kim & S. H. Ham. (2008). Effects of Need for Cognition and Sensation Seeking on the User's Responses to Interactivity. Korean Jouranl of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 22(4).
  14. D. H. Cho. (2007). Study of the Characteristics of Books In the Age of Multimedia, Doctoral Thesis. Sungkyunkwan Univ.
  15. R. N. Shepard. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6. pp. 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80067-7
  16. L. Standing & L Standingt. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222 https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747308400340
  17. L. A. Lutz & R. J. Lutz (1977). Effect of Interactivity Imagery on Learning: Application to Advertising. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 494-498.
  18. D. M. Boyed & N. B. Ellison. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. 210-230.
  19. J. Donath & D. Boyed. (2004). Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
  20. N. B. Ellison. R. Heino & J. Gibbs. (2006). Managing impressions online: self-presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
  21. T. M. Lee. (2003). The Effects of components of interactivity on purchase intentions in mobile environments, Doctoral Thesis, Seoul National Univ.
  22. P. K. Kannan, A. M. Chang & A. B Whinston. (2001). Wireless commerce: marketing issues and possibilities. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawai International Conference System Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos.
  23. K. Siau, E. P. Lim & Z. Shen. (2001). Mobile commerce: promises, challenges, and research agenda. Journal of Database Management, 12(3), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2001070101
  24. R. Kalakota & M. Robinson. (2001). E-Business 2.0: Road-map for Success, Addison-Wesley, Harlow.
  25. C. H. Cho, Y. H. Sung, K. J. Han, T. J. Kwon & W. Y. Choi. (2011). Analysis of Twitter Usage. Advertising Research, 88.
  26. V. Tomita, C. I. Daniasa, D. Stuparu. & M. Stanciu. (2010). THE MECHANISMS OF THE INFLUENCE OF VIRAL MARKETING IN SOCIAL MEDIA. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 3, 278-282.
  27. S. Chu & Y. Kim. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic Word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1).
  28. J. S. Lee. (1998). The Importance and Usage of WOM Effects, Cheil Communications,
  29. http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/news_view.asp?artice_id= 20150730085432
  30. DMC Media Report, (2017). http://www.dmcreport.co.kr,
  31. Y. J. Yang. (2010). The Advertising Media Strategy of The Digital Media Era, Communication Books.
  32. M. H. Oh & I. Kim. (2014). The Effect of Consumer Attitude toward Fashion Products on SNS's Characteristics to Purchase Intention and On-line Word of Mouth. Journal of Korea Fashion Design, 14(1).
  33. H. J. Seong & J. Y. Ko. (2012). The Effect of SNS Information Quality Characteristics on the Satisfaction and the Intention of Continuous Use. The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 24(2).
  34. Y. J. Lee & Y. J. Rhee. (2013). An experimental qualitative study on the characteristics of fashion brand's mobile SNS -Focusing on mobile Facebook. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 21(6).
  35. S. N. Lee & K. Y. Lee. (2013). Determinants of eWOM Behavior of SNS Users With Emphasis on Personal Characteristics, SNS Traits, Interpersonal Influence, Social Capital. The Korean Journal of advertising and public relations, 15(4).
  36. J. E. Choi & D. H. Lee. (2013). The Impact of SNS Network's Features on the Formation of Social Capital. Korean Academic Society of Business Administration. 42(3).
  37. H. J. Lee. (2013). The Effect of Social Capital and Information Attributes on Interaction and e-WOM in Social Network Services. Korea Marketing Review, 28(Aprill).
  38. Y. Gao & M. Koufaris. (2006). Peceptual antecedents of user attitude in electronic commerce. The DATA BASE for Advance of Information Systems. 37, 42-50.
  39. R. Bauer & S. Greyser. (1968). Advertising in America: The consumer view. Boston, MA: Havard University Press.
  40. J. C. Andrews. (1989). The dimensionality of beliefs toward advertising in general. Journal of Advertising, 18(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673140
  41. A. E. Schlosser, S. Shavitt & A. kanfer. (1999). Survey of internet users' attitudes toward internet advertising. Journal of Intractive Marketing, 13()3. 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199922)13:3<34::AID-DIR3>3.0.CO;2-R
  42. I. K. Brackett & B. N. Carr. (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs Other media: Consumer vs Mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising research, 41(5). 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-5-23-32
  43. D. An & S. Kim. (2007). A First investigation into the cross-cultural perceptions of Internet advertising: A Comparison of Korean and American attitudes. Journal International Consumer Marketing, 20(2), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v20n02_05
  44. M. M. Tsang, S. C. Ho & T. P. Liang. (2004). Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3). 65-78.
  45. J. Zhang & E. Mao. (2008). Understanding the acceptance mobile sms advertising among young chinese consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20239
  46. M. Chae, J. Kim, H. Kim & H. Ryu. (2002). Information quality for mobile Internet services: A theoretical model with empirical validation. Electronic Markets, 12(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802753433254
  47. K. M. Elliot (2002). Understanding consumer to consumer influence on the web, Doctorial dissertation, Duke university.
  48. N. Hanna &, R. Wozniak (2001). Consumer Behavior: An Applied Approach, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  49. R. Nisbett, &, L. Ross (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcoming of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  50. R. Grewal, T. W. Cline & A. G. McKenna (2003). Early-EntrantAdvantage, Word-of-Mouth Communication, Brand Similarity, and the Consumer Decision-Making Process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_01
  51. C. Liu, Marchewka, J. T. & C. S. Yu (2005), Beyond Concem-A Privacy-Trust- Behavioral Intention Model of Electronic Commerce. Information and Management, 42, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.003
  52. I. K. Brackett, B. N. Carr, (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs Other media: Consumer vs Mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising research, 41(5), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-5-23-32
  53. H. S. Byeon. (2008). The Effects of Internet User's Trust, Impulsiveness and Commitment on the Outcomes of Visiting Web Stores. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 21(4).
  54. H. S. Ki, S. Y. Lee. (2001). The effect of comparative advertising according to their comparative intensity, copy claim variation and product involvement. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 12 (3).
  55. R. Ohanian. (1991). The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons' Perceived Image on Consumers' Intention to Purchase. Journal of Advertising Research , 31(1), 46-54.
  56. S. E. Myeung. (2010). The Apperance and Trait of Social Media. Oricom Brand Journal, 52, 1-3.
  57. B. Bickart, & , R. M. Schindler(2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1014
  58. S. C. Chu & Y. Kim (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in ele ctronic w ord-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
  59. R. H. Ducoffe , (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5). 21-36.
  60. K. Wolin (2004). A Comparison of Attitudes towards Internet Advertising among Lifestyle Segments in Taiwan. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10. 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000181657
  61. Y. Choi, J. Hwang & Mcmillan, S.. (2008). Gearing up for mobile advertising: "A cross cultural exemination of key factors that drive mobile messages home to consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 756-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20237
  62. D. G. Taylor, J. E. Lewin & D. Strutton (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? How gender and age shape recepivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1). 258-275. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275
  63. M. J. Ellis (1973). Why People Play, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  64. R. J. Vallerand, L. I. Gauvin & W. R. Halliwell (1986). Negative effects of competition on children's intrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713638
  65. I. Maignan & B. A. Lukas. (1997). The Nature and Social Uses of the Internet: A Qualitative Investigation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(2), 346-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00395.x
  66. T. S. H. Teo, V. K. G. Lim & R. Y. C. Lai. (1999). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
  67. R. Agarwal & E. Karahanna (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  68. T. M. Schindler & Bickart, B. (2002). Published word of mouth: referable, customer- generated information on the Internet. Working paper.
  69. J. W. Lee, I. W. Kang & S. W. Jeong, (2011). The influence of SNS content quality on users' adoption behavior and WOM. Korea Knowledge Management Society, 12(5).
  70. Y. Lin & I. J. Shrum, (2002). What is Intractivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person and Situation for the Influence of Intractivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4). 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  71. A. Goldfarb & T. Catherine. (2011). Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obstrusiveness. Marketing Science. 30(3), 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0583
  72. S. J. McMillan. (2002). Exploring Models of Intractivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documrnts, and Systems, in Handbook of New Media(Liverow & Livingstone, eds), London: Sage, 162-182.
  73. M. Lombard & J. Snyder-Dutch(2001). Intractive Advertising and Presence: A Framework.Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(2).
  74. J. V. Pavlik. (1996). New Media and the Information Superhighway, Allyn and Bacon.
  75. D. Hoffman & T. P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in HypermediaComputer-mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journalof Marketing , 60(3), 50-68.
  76. C. H. Cho & , D. J. Leckenby (1999). Intractivity as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness proceeding. in Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising in Albuquerque.
  77. H. Ko, C. H. Cho & , M. S. Roberts, (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structual equation model of intractive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2). 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639191
  78. J. R. Coyle & E. Thorson. (2001). The Effects of Pro-gressive Levels of Intractivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
  79. E. Y. Lee. (2004). Two factor model of online word of mouth andoption and diffusion, Doctoral Thesis , Seoul National Univ.
  80. C. N. Warthen & , J. Burkell. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10016
  81. K. Lin, & H. Lu. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook Fan Pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(10), 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0472
  82. S. B. Mackenzie, R. J. Lutz & G. E. Belch , (1986). The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediate of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (May), 130-143.
  83. J. F. Engel, R. D. Blackwell & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior, Forth Worth: The Dryden Press.