DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Ecological Network According to Invalidation of Decision on Urban Parks: Focused on Busan

도시공원 일몰제에 따른 생태네트워크 변화 분석: 부산광역시를 대상으로

  • Kang, Jung-Eun (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Sun (Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Hwang, Hee-Soo (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Sanghyeok (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.10.23
  • Accepted : 2018.12.07
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

This study examined ecological network change affected by the 2020 invalidation of decisions on urban parks with a focus on Busan. The analyses were conducted to five scenarios using FRAGSTATS. The green space in scenario 1 assuming all development for unexecuted urban park would decrease by 7,339.75 ha compared to scenario 5, which assumes the entire conservation of unexecuted urban parks, and the fragmentation of the ecological space in scenario 1 increased. In scenario 1, 8.06% of the total area of core habitats and 28.23% of connectivity would decrease. However, scenario 3, which assumes the conservation of environmentally sensitive areas of unexecuted urban parks, can achieve 94% of green space and 95.6% of the connectivity of the scenario 5. Scenario 3 has effects similar to scenario 5 in terms of defragmentation. Thus, conservation of environmentally sensitive areas in parks is critical and effective in maintaining ecological networks.

본 연구는 2020년 장기미집행 도시공원의 자동실효(이하 도시공원 일몰)로 인한 생태네트워크 측면에서의 영향을 부산지역을 대상으로 분석하였다. 분석은 도시공원 일몰과 관련하여 가능한 5개의 시나리오를 구축하고 각 시나리오별 생태네트워크 변화를 FRAGSTATS의 경관지수들을 활용하여 살펴보았다. 일몰 예정 공원에 대해 전체 개발을 가정하는 시나리오 1은 해당 공원들의 전체 보전을 가정한 시나리오 5에 비해 녹지면적이 7,339.75ha가 감소하고, 생태공간의 파편화도 증가하는 것으로 분석되었다. 내부종 서식지에 영향을 미치는 중심지 비중도 8.06%이상 감소되며, 녹지 간 연결성도 28.23% 이상 감소되는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 공원 내 생태적 가치가 높은 지역을 중심으로 보전하는 것을 가정하는 시나리오 3은 시나리오 5(전체 대상지 보전)의 94% 지역에 대한 보전이 가능하며, 연결성 측면에서는 95.6% 이상 보완이 가능할 뿐 아니라 생태지역 파편화 측면에서도 공원예정지 전체를 조성하는 것과 유사한 효과가 나타나고 있었다. 따라서, 일몰 예정 공원에서도 보전가치가 높은 지역을 중심으로 보전하는 것은 생태네트워크 측면에서 효과가 상당히 높음을 확인할 수 있었다. 현재 지자체에서 이들 보전지역을 중심으로 우선 해제를 시행하고 있는데, 이들 지역은 개발의 수준이 낮다고 해도 산발적 개발가능성이 높으므로 현재 추진 중인 우선 해제에 대한 재고가 필요하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of long-term unexecuted urban parks in Busan

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Landcover of each scenario

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Results of main landscape index

Table 1. Scenarios for Analysis

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Metrics of FRAGSTATS

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Long term unexecuted urban parks in Busan(2017)

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Environmentally sensitive areas in unexecuted urban park in Busan

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Ratio of Landcover of Each Scenario

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Landscape metrics according to scenario

HOPHBL_2018_v27n6_618_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. Ahn YJ, Lee DK, Kim HG, Mo YW. 2014. Applying Connectivity Analysis for Prioritizing Unexecuted Urban Parks in Sungnam. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 17(3): 75-86. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.3.75
  2. Benedict MA, MacMahon ET. 2002. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable resources journal. 20(3): 12-17
  3. Choi JY, Kang MS, Bea SJ, Kim HK, Chung SY. 2010. Analysis of Landscape Structure on the Impervious Cover of the Gap-Stream Watershed using FRAGSTATS. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 52(4): 53-61. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2010.52.4.053
  4. Choi SH, Kwon SS, Lee SD. 2011. Study on Fish Diversity by Impervious Cover of Gyeongan-Stream Watershed. Korean Wetlands Society. 14(4): 561-569. [Korean Literature]
  5. Di Giulio M, Holderegger R, Tobias S. 2009. Effects of habitat and landscape fragmentation on humans and biodiversity in densely populated landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management. 90(10): 2959-2968 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.002
  6. Eppink FV, Van Den Bergh JCJM, Rietveld P. 2004. Modelling biodiversity and land use: Urban growth, agriculture and nature in a wetland area. Ecological Economics. 51(3-4): 201-216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.011
  7. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. 2007. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters. 3(4): 390-394 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
  8. Gardner RH. 1999. RULE: map generation and a spatial analysis program. Landscape Ecological Analysis. 13: 280-303
  9. Heo SG, Kim KS, Ahn JH, Yoon JS, Lim KJ, Choi JD, Shin YC, Lyou CW. 2007. Landscape Analysis of the Forest Fragmentations at Doam-Dam Watershed using the FRAGSTATS Model. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 10(1): 10-21. [Korean Literature]
  10. Jang SH. 2008. A Study on a Landscape Structure as a Change of Impervious Cover Rate in the Osan-cheon Watershed. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment. 17(5): 289-297. [Korean Literature]
  11. Ji SY, Choi JY, Lee SH, Lee SH. 2016. Prediction of Fragmentation Impact Range of Forest Development Analyzing the Pattern of Landscape Indexes. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 19(2): 109-119. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.2.109
  12. Kang JE, Uhm JH, Bae HJ, Choi HS, Lee MJ, Kang YW, Park JC. 2012a. Green Infrastructure Strategy for Urban Climate Adaptation. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
  13. Kang WM, Ko IS, Park CH, Lee DW. 2012b. An Analysis of Changes in Forest Fragmentation and Morphology in Surrounding Landscapes of Maeulsoops and Jinan-gun. Korean Journal of Environmental and Ecology. 26(6): 941-951. [Korean Literature]
  14. Kang WM, Song YK, Sung HC, Lee DK. 2018. Assessing conservation priorities of unexecuted urban parks in Seoul using ecological network and accessibility analyses. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Tecnology. 21(2): 53-64. [Korean Literature]
  15. Kim JH, Ra JH, Lee SJ, Kwon OS, Cho HJ, Lee EJ. 2016. Fragmentation Analysis of Daejeon City's Green Biotope Using Landscape Index and Visualization Method. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 19(3): 29-44. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.3.29
  16. Kim WJ, Jin JK. 2015. A Study on the Plans to Establish Standards for Setting Priorities of Compensation for Unexecuted Urban Planning Facilities Infrastructure in Green Tract of Land. The Seoul Institute. [Korean Literature]
  17. Kwon OS, Na JH, Ku JN, Kim JH. 2015. Temporal-Spatial Analysis of Landscape Diversity using FRAGSTATS. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 18(3): 30-50. [Korean Literature]
  18. Kwon SS, Choi SH, Lee SD. 2012. A Study of the Landscape Analysis at Su-ji/Gi-heung in Young-in city using the FRAGSTATS Model. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 21(5): 781-787. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2012.21.5.781
  19. Lee DK, Park C, Oh KS. 2010. Forest Patch Characteristics and Their Contribution to Forest-Bird Diversity -Focus on Chungcheong Province Area-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 13(5): 146-153. [Korean Literature]
  20. Lee GE. 2017. A Research on the Impact of Urban Park on the Inherent Value of an Apartment : Using Network Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation. Pusan National University [Korean Literature]
  21. Lee IS, Yoon EJ. 2008. Analysis of Scale Sensitivity of Landscape Indices for the Assessment of Urban Green Areas. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 36(2): 69-79. [Korean Literature]
  22. Lee SB. 2007. Study on Landscape Ecological Methodology for Ecological Ridgeline Analysis. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
  23. McGarigal K, Marks BJ. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 p
  24. Ministry of Environment. 2002. Ecological network construction strategy. [Korean Literature]
  25. Ministry of Environment. 2018. The Policy Response of Invalidation of Decision on Urban Park for Ecological Soundness in Urban [Korean Literature]
  26. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2017. Guidelines for Termination of Unexecuted Urban Planning Facilities in Long-term. [Korean Literature]
  27. Oh DH. 2006. Studies on Constructing ecological network in Busan. Busan Development Institute. [Korean Literature]
  28. Oh GS, Lee DW, Jung SH, Park CS. 2009. A Spatial Decision Support System for Establishing Urban Ecological Network; Based on the Landscape Ecology Theory. The Journal of Geographic Information System Association of Korea. 17(3): 251-259. [Korean Literature]
  29. Park CS, Oh KS. 2007 .Ecological Network Planning and Land Use Strategies for Sustainable Urban Landscape and Land Management in Korea. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
  30. Park H. 2012. A Study on the Implications from the Modern Large Park Planning and the Feature. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction. 14(3): 63-74. [Korean Literature]
  31. Saura S, Martinez-Millan J. 2000. Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method. Landscape Ecology. 15(7): 661-678 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008107902848
  32. Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G. 2000. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning. 48(3-4): 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2
  33. Song IJ. 2011. Policy Report. (88): 1-19. The Seoul Institute.
  34. Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD. 2007. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology. 22: 171-177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2
  35. Weber T, Sloan A, Wolf J. 2006. Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment: Development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning. 77(1-2): 94-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.002
  36. Yoon EJ, Song EJ, Jeong YH, Kim EY, Lee DG. 2018. Spatial Decision Support System for Development and Conservation of Unexecuted Urban Park using ACO - Ant Colony Optimization. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 21(2): 39-51. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2018.21.2.39
  37. Yoon EJ. 2006. Analysis of scale sensitivity and spatial discrimination of the landscape indices for the assessment of urban green in Seoul. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Seoul [Korean Literature]

Cited by

  1. 매개중심성 분석을 활용한 서울시 미집행공원 내 사유지 보전 우선순위 평가 vol.110, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2021.110.1.22
  2. 부산광역시 장산 일대의 관속식물상 vol.24, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2021.24.3.49