DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Trends of Forest Liming and the Effects of Liming on Forest Ecosystems

산림 대상 석회 시용의 연구 경향과 산림생태계에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jusub (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Chang, Hanna (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Roh, Yujin (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Han, Seung Hyun (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Son, Yowhan (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • 김주섭 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 장한나 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 노유진 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 한승현 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 손요환 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.19
  • Accepted : 2018.03.05
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

The current study aimed to review the research trends on forest liming by age, country, and research topics, and seeks to summarize the effects of forest liming on soil, vegetation and water system in forest ecosystems. The recent goals of forest liming have been changed in response to changes in the acid deposition, and related studies have been mainly carried out in Europe and North America, where there is noted a massive forest decline, which was subsequently caused by acid rain. Most forest liming studies are noted to have focused on soil responses, however, the number of studies on the responses of vegetation and water system according to a literature review on the subject were relatively small. Meanwhile, forest liming influenced whole forest ecosystems through interaction between the soil, vegetation and water system as associated with the relevant regions. The changes in soil pH, base saturation, and cation exchange capacity by forest liming were noted as different depending on the soil layer and elapsed time after liming. The responses of vegetation to forest liming were shown in above- and below-ground plant growth and plant nutrient concentration, and also were noted to have varied depending on the available regional plant species and noted specific soil conditions. The chemical properties of the water system were changed similarly to those in the soil, leading to notable changes as seen in the planktons and available fish species in the region. Finally, these results could be used to plan further studies on forest liming, which would significantly benefit regional studies to promote the preservation of the species noted for protection in the region.

본 연구는 산림생태계에서의 석회 시용 연구를 연대별, 국가별 그리고 주제별로 경향을 파악하고 석회 시용이 산림생태계의 각 요소 (토양, 식생, 수계 등)에 미치는 영향을 종합 분석하고자 하였다. 산림 대상 석회 시용은 연대별 산성강하물 유입량의 변화에 따라 시용 목적이 달라졌으며, 관련 연구는 산성화로 인한 대규모 산림 피해가 발생한 유럽과 북미 지역에서 주로 수행되었다. 대부분의 석회 시용 연구는 토양 반응을 중심으로 수행되었고, 토양 이외에 식생, 수계 등을 포함한 연구의 수는 비교적 적었다. 한편 산림 대상 석회 시용의 효과는 토양, 식생 및 수계 사이의 유기적인 상호작용을 통해 산림생태계 전체에 미치며 특히 화학적 성질변화가 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 석회 시용 후 토양의 pH, BS, CEC 변화는 토양 층위와 경과 시간에 따라 다르게 나타났다. 그리고 식생의 반응은 지상부 및 지하부 생장과 식물체 내 양분 농도의 변화로 이어졌으며, 수종과 토양 조건에 따라 반응은 다르게 나타났다. 수계는 석회 시용 후 토양에서와 유사한 화학적 성질 변화를 보였으며, 이는 플랑크톤과 어류 등의 생물상 변화로 이어졌다. 본 연구 결과는 향후 석회 시용 관련 연구를 계획하는 단계에서 중요한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akselsson C, H Hultberg, PE Karlsson, GP Karlsson and S Hellsten. 2013. Acidification trends in south Swedish forest soils 1986-2008: Slow recovery and high sensitivity to sea-salt episodes. Sci. Total Environ. 444:271-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.106
  2. Aldinger E and WL Kremer. 1985. Investigations on increment of healthy and damaged Norway spruces and silver fir growing on previously limed areas. Eur. J. For. Res. 104:360-373.
  3. Andersson F and T Persson. 1988. Liming as a measure to improve soil and tree condition in areas affected by air pollution. Report 3518. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board, Strockholm.
  4. Baath E and K Arnebrant. 1994. Growth rate and response of bacterial communities to pH in limed and ash treated forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26:995-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90114-7
  5. Bakker MR, R Kerisit, K Verbist and C Nys. 2000. Effects of liming on rhizosphere chemistry and growth of fine roots and of shoots of sessile oak (Quercus Petraea). Plant Soil 217:243-255.
  6. Balcar V, D Kacalek, I Kunes and D Dusek. 2011. Effect of soil liming on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) plantations. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A For. 53:85-92.
  7. Blette VL and RM Newton. 1996. Effects of watershed liming on the soil chemistry of Woods Lake, New York. Biogeochemistry 32:175-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187138
  8. Brach AR and DJ Raynal. 1992. Effects of liming on Oxalis acetosella and Lycopodium lucidulum in a northern hardwood forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 29:492-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404517
  9. Brahmer G. 1994. Effects of whole catchment liming and Mg addition on soil water and runoff at two forested watersheds in the Black Forest (Germany). For. Ecol. Manage. 68:47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90137-6
  10. Brocksen RW and PW Emler Jr. 1988. Living lakes: An aquatic liming and fish restoration demonstration program. Water Air Soil Pollut. 41:85-93.
  11. Brocksen RW, HW Zoettl, DB Porcella, RF Huettl, KH Feger and J Wisniewski. 1988. Experimental liming of watersheds: An international cooperative effort between the United States and west Germany. Water Air Soil Pollut. 41:455-471.
  12. Bukaveckas PA. 1988. Effects of calcite treatment on primary producers in acidified Adirondack lakes - Response of macrophyte communities. Lake Reserv. Manag. 4:107-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07438148809354385
  13. Bukaveckas PA. 1989. Effects of calcite treatment on primary producers in acidified Adirondack lakes. II. Short-term response by phytoplankton communities. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 46:352-359. https://doi.org/10.1139/f89-046
  14. Burke MK and DJ Raynal. 1998. Liming influences growth and nutrient balances in sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings on an acidic forest soil. Environ. Exp. Bot. 39:105- 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00029-4
  15. Carbone J, W Keller and RW Griffiths. 1998. Effects of changes in acidity on aquatic insects in rocky littoral habitats of lakes near Sudbury, Ontario. Restor. Ecol. 6:376-389. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.06408.x
  16. Chagnon M, D Pare, C Hebert and C Camire. 2001. Effects of experimental liming on collembolan communities and soil microbial biomass in a southern Quebec sugar saple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stand. Appl. Soil Ecol. 17:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00134-7
  17. Cho Y, CT Driscoll and JD Blum. 2009. The effects of a whole-watershed calcium addition on the chemistry of stream storm events at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in NH, USA. Sci. Total Environ. 407:5392-5401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.030
  18. Cirmo CP and CT Driscoll. 1996. The impacts of a watershed $CaCO_3$ treatment on stream and wetland biogeochemistry in the Adirondack mountains. Biogeochemistry 32:265-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187142
  19. Clayton JL, ES Dannaway, R Menendez, HW Rauch, JJ Renton, SM Sherlock and PE Zurbuch. 1998. Application of limestone to restore fish communities in acidified streams. North Am. J. Fish Manage. 18:347-360. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018<0347:AOLTRF>2.0.CO;2
  20. Clemensson-Lindell A and H Persson. 1993. Long-term effects of liming on the fine-root standing crop of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in relation to chemical changes in the soil. Scand. J. For. Res. 8:384-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589309382785
  21. Demchik MC and WE Sharpe. 2001. Forest floor plant response to lime and fertilizer before and after partial cutting of a northern red oak stand on an extremely acidic soil in Pennsylvania, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 144:239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00388-1
  22. Derome J and A Saarsalmi. 1999. The effect of liming and correction fertilisation on heavy metal and macronutrient concentrations in soil solution in heavy-metal polluted Scots pine stands. Environ. Pollut. 104:249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00183-3
  23. Derome J, M Kukkola, A Smolander and T Lehto. 2000. Liming of forest soils. pp. 328-337. In Forest Condition in a Changing Environment (Malkonen E ed.). Springer, Dordrecht.
  24. Derome J. 2000. Detoxification and amelioration of heavy-metal contaminated forest soils by means of liming and fertilisation. Environ. Pollut. 107:79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00132-3
  25. Donnelly A, E Jennings and N Allott. 2003. A review of liming options for afforested catchments in Ireland. Biol. Environ. 103B:91-105.
  26. Driscoll CT, CP Cirmo, TJ Fahey and CL Schofield. 1996. The experimental watershed liming study: Comparison of lake and watershed neutralization strategies. pp. 1-32. In Experimental Watershed Liming Study (Driscoll CT ed.). Springer, Dordrecht.
  27. Driscoll CT, GB Lawrence, AJ Bulger and KC Weathers. 2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies: the effects of acidic deposition in the northeastern United States include the acidification of soil and water, which stresses terrestrial and aquatic biota. Bioscience 51:180- 198. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0180:ADITNU]2.0.CO;2
  28. Forey E, J Trap and M Aubert. 2015. Liming impacts Fagus sylvatica leaf traits and litter decomposition 25 years after amendment. For. Ecol. Manage. 353:67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.050
  29. Formanek P and V Vranova. 2003. A contribution to the effect of liming on forest soils: Review of literature. J. For. Sci. 49:182-190.
  30. Foster NW, GD Hogan and IK Morrison. 1988. Growth of jack pine forest on an acid brunisol treated with lime. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19:1393-1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628809368021
  31. Frank J and AO Stuanes. 2003. Short-term effects of liming and vitality fertilization on forest soil and nutrient leaching in a Scots pine ecosystem in Norway. For. Ecol. Manage. 176:371-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00285-2
  32. Fuss CB, CT Driscoll and JL Campbell. 2015. Recovery from chronic and snowmelt acidification: Long-term trends in stream and soil water chemistry at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120:2360-2374. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003063
  33. Groffman PM, MC Fisk, CT Driscoll, GE Likens, TJ Fahey, C Eagar and LH Pardo. 2006. Calcium additions and microbial nitrogen cycle processes in a northern hardwood forest. Ecosystems 9:1289-1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0177-z
  34. Guckland A, B Ahrends, U Paar and J Eichhorn. 2012. Predicting depth translocation of base cations after forest liming: Results from long-term experiments. Eur. J. For. Res. 131:1869-1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0639-0
  35. Gunn JM, JG Hamilton, GM Booth, CD Wren, GL Beggs, HJ Rietveld and JR Munro. 1990. Survival, growth and reproduction of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) after neutralization of an acidic lake near Sudbury, Ontario. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 47:446-453. https://doi.org/10.1139/f90-048
  36. Hahn G and H Marschner. 1998. Effect of acid irrigation and liming on root growth of Norway Spruce. Plant Soil 199:11-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004254709452
  37. Hall Jr. RO, KH Macneale, ES Bernhardt, M Field and GE Likens. 2001. Biogeochemical responses of two forest streams to a 2-month calcium addition. Freshw. Biol. 46:291-302. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00660.x
  38. Helmisaari HS and L Hallbacken. 1999. Fine-root biomass and necromass in limed and fertilized Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 119:99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00514-3
  39. Helmisaari HS, K Makkonen, M Olsson and E Malkonen. 1999. Fine-root growth, mortality and heavy metal concentrations in limed and fertilized Pinus silvestris (L.) stands in the vicinity of a Cu-Ni smelter in SW Finland. Plant Soil 209:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004595531203
  40. Homan C, C Beier, T McCay and G Lawrence. 2016. Application of lime ($CaCO_3$) to promote forest recovery from severe acidification increases potential for earthworm invasion. For. Ecol. Manage. 368:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.002
  41. Hu Q and BJ Huser. 2014. Anthropogenic oligotrophication via liming: Long-term phosphorus trends in acidified, limed, and neutral reference lakes in Sweden. Ambio 43:104-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0573-0
  42. Huber C, R Baier, A Gottlein and W Weis. 2006. Changes in soil, seepage water and needle chemistry between 1984 and 2004 after liming an N-saturated Norway spruce stand at the Hoglwald, Germany. For. Ecol. Manage. 233:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.058
  43. Hudy M, DM Downey and DW Bowman. 2000. Successful restoration of an acidified native brook trout stream through mitigation with limestone sand. North Am. J. Fish Manage. 20:453-466. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0453:SROAAN>2.3.CO;2
  44. Huettl RF. 1989. Liming and fertilization as mitigation tools in declining forest ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 44:93- 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228781
  45. Huettl RF and HW Zoettl. 1993. Liming as a mitigation tool in Germany's declining forests-reviewing results from former and recent trials. For. Ecol. Manage. 61:325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90209-6
  46. Hultberg H and P Grennfelt. 1986. Gardsjon project: Lake acidification, chemistry in catchment runoff, lake liming and microcatchment manipulations. pp. 31-46. In Acidic Precipitation (Martin HC ed.). Springer, Dordrecht.
  47. Huss-Danell K. 1986. Growth and production of leaf litter nitrogen by Alnus incana in response to liming and fertilization on degenerated forest soil. Can. J. For. Res. 16:847- 853. https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-149
  48. Hwang J and Y Son. 2006. Short-term effects of thinning and liming on forest soils of pitch pine and Japanese larch plantations in Central Korea. Ecol. Res. 21:671-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0170-1
  49. Hwang J, Y Son, C Kim, MJ Yi, ZS Kim, WK Lee and SK Hong. 2007. Fine root dynamics in thinned and limed pitch pine and Japanese larch plantations. J. Plant Nutr. 30:1821-1839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160701628940
  50. Hyvonen R and T Persson. 1990. Effects of acidification and liming on feeding groups of nematodes in coniferous forest soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 9:205-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336226
  51. Ingerslev M. 1997. Effects of liming and fertilization on growth, soil chemistry and soil water chemistry in a Norway spruce plantation on a nutrient-poor soil in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manage. 92:55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03964-3
  52. Ingerslev M, E Malkonen, P Nilsen and K Raulund-Rasmussen. 2001. Main findings and future challenges in forest nutritional research and management in the Nordic countries. Scand. J. For. Res. 16:488-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580152699330
  53. Jarvinen M, K Kuoppamaki and M Rask. 1995. Responses of phyto-and zooplankton to liming in a small acidified humic lake. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85:943-948. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476951
  54. Jenkins A, D Waters and A Donald. 1991. An assessment of terrestrial liming strategies in upland Wales. J. Hydrol. 124:243-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90017-C
  55. Jonard M, F Andre, P Giot and Q Ponette. 2010. Thirteen-year monitoring of liming and PK fertilization effects on tree vitality in Norway spruce and European beech stands. Eur. J. For. Res. 129:1203-1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0410-3
  56. Jung YK and HH Lee. 1993. Effects of lime and NPK application rates on the soil characteristics after a 10-year experiment in oversown hilly pasture of mixed grass-clover sward. Korean Grassl. Sci. 13:49-57.
  57. Kalbitz K, S Solinger, JH Park and E Matzner. 2000. Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: A review. Soil Sci. 165:277-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200004000-00001
  58. Kim JH. 2005. Atmospheric acidic deposition: Response to soil and forest ecosystems. Korean J. Ecol. 28:417-431. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2005.28.6.417
  59. Koo NI, YS Kim, HT Choi and JH Lim. 2016. Monitoring of forest soil acidification impacts and developing assessment and management techniques. National Institute of Forest Science. Seoul.
  60. Kreutzer K. 1995. Effects of forest liming on soil processes. Plant Soil 168:447-470.
  61. Kuylenstierna JC, H Rodhe, S Cinderby and K Hicks. 2001. Acidification in developing countries: Ecosystem sensitivity and the critical load approach on a global scale. Ambio 30:20-28. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-30.1.20
  62. Lautenbach WE, J Miller, PJ Beckett and K Winterhalder. 1995. Municipal land restoration program: The regreening process. pp. 109-122. In Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region (Gunn JM ed.). Springer, New York.
  63. Lawrence GB, DA Burns and K Riva-Murray. 2016. A new look at liming as an approach to accelerate recovery from acidic deposition effects. Sci. Total Environ. 562:35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.176
  64. Lawrence GB, JE Dukett, N Houck, P Snyder and SB Capone. 2013. Increases in dissolved organic carbon accelerate loss of toxic Al in Adirondack lakes recovering from acidification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:7095-7100. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4004763
  65. Li Z, Y Wang, Y Liu, H Guo, T Li, ZH Li and G Shi. 2014. Long-term effects of liming on health and growth of a masson pine stand damaged by soil acidification in Chongqing, China. PLOS One 9:e94230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094230
  66. Likens GE, DC Buso, BK Dresser, ES Bernhardt, RO Hall Jr, KH Macneale and SW Bailey. 2004. Buffering an acidic stream in New Hampshire with a silicate mineral. Restor. Ecol. 12:419-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00357.x
  67. Lofgren S, N Cory, T Zetterberg and V Kronnas. 2009. The Long-term effects of catchment liming and reduced sulphur deposition on forest soils and runoff chemistry in southwest Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 258:567-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.030
  68. Long RP, S Horsley and TJ Hall. 2011. Long-term impact of liming on growth and vigor of northern hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 41:1295-1307. https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-049
  69. Long RP, SB Horsley and PR Lilja. 1997. Impact of forest liming on growth and crown vigor of sugar maple and associated hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 27:1560-1573. https://doi.org/10.1139/x97-074
  70. Long RP, SW Bailey, SB Horsley, TJ Hall, BR Swistock and DR DeWalle. 2015. Long-term effects of forest liming on soil, soil leachate, and foliage chemistry in northern Pennsylvania. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 79:1223-1236. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.11.0465
  71. Lundstrom US, DC Bain, AFS Taylor and PAW Van Hees. 2003. Effects of acidification and its mitigation with lime and wood ash on forest soil processes: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 3:5-28.
  72. Lutzow MV, L Zelles, I Scheunert and JCG Ottow. 1992. Seasonal effect of liming, irrigation, and acid precipitation on microbial biomass N in a spruce (Picea abies L.) forest soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 13:130-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336267
  73. Matzner E, PK Khanna, KJ Meiwes and B Ulrich. 1985. Effects of fertilization and liming on the chemical soil conditions and element distribution in forest soils. Plant Soil 87:405-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181907
  74. Meiwes KJ. 1995. Application of lime and wood ash to decrease acidification of forest soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85:143-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00483696
  75. Misson L, Q Ponette and F Andre. 2001. Regional scale effects of base cation fertilization on Norway spruce and European beech stands situated on acid brown soils: Soil and foliar chemistry. Ann. For. Sci. 58:699-712. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2001157
  76. Moore JD, L Duchesne and R Ouimet. 2008. Soil properties and maple-beech regeneration a decade after liming in a northern hardwood stand. For. Ecol. Manage. 255:3460- 3468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.026
  77. Moore JD, R Ouimet and L Duchesne. 2012. Soil and sugar maple response 15 years after dolomitic lime application. For. Ecol. Manage. 281:130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.026
  78. Moore JD, R Ouimet, RP Long and PA Bukaveckas. 2014. Ecological benefits and risks arising from liming sugar maple dominated forests in northeastern north America. Environ. Rev. 23:66-77.
  79. Murach D. 1988. Judgement of the applicability of liming to restabilise forest stands-with special consideration of root ecological aspects. pp. 445-451. In Air Pollution and Ecosystems (Mathy P ed.). Springer, Grenoble.
  80. Neal C, C Smith and S Hill. 1992. Forestry impact on upland water quality. pp. 1-50. In Institute of Hydrology Report No. 119. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.
  81. Neale SP, Z Shah and WA Adams. 1997. Changes in microbial biomass and nitrogen turnover in acidic organic soils following liming. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29:1463-1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00040-0
  82. Newton RM, DA Burns, VL Blette and CT Driscoll. 1996. Effect of whole catchment liming on the episodic acidification of two Adirondack streams. Biogeochemistry 32:299- 322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187143
  83. Nohrstedt HO. 2001. Response of coniferous forest ecosystems on mineral soils to nutrient additions: A review of Swedish experiences. Scand. J. For. Res. 16:555-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580152699385
  84. Oh NH and PA Raymond. 2006. Contribution of agricultural liming to riverine bicarbonate export and $CO_2$ sequestration in the Ohio river basin. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 20: GB3012.
  85. Olsson BA and O Kellner. 2002. Effects of soil acidification and liming on ground flora establishment after clear-felling of Norway spruce in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 158:127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00713-1
  86. Pabian SE, NM Ermer, WM Tzilkowski and MC Brittingham. 2012a. Effects of liming on forage availability and nutrient content in a forest impacted by acid rain. PLoS One 7:e39755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039755
  87. Pabian SE, SM Rummel, WE Sharpe and MC Brittingham. 2012b. Terrestrial liming as a restoration technique for acidified forest ecosystems. Int. J. For. Res. 2012:ID976809.
  88. Pawlowski L. 1997. Acidification: Its impact on the environment and mitigation strategies. Ecol. Eng. 8:271-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00023-2
  89. Persson G and M Appelberg. 2001. Evidence of lower productivity in long term limed lakes as compared to unlimed lakes of similar pH. Water Air Soil Pollut. 130:1769-1774. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013980607595
  90. Persson H and K Ahlstrom. 1990. The effects of forest liming on fertilization on fine-root growth. Water Air Soil Pollut. 54:365-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385231
  91. Persson H, K Ahlstrom and A Clemensson-Lindell. 1996. Skogsmarkkalkningens effekter pa rotterna. pp. 101-110. In Skogsmarkskalkning. Resultat och slutsatser fran Naturvardsverkets forsoksverksamhet, Report 4559 (Staaf H, T Persson and U Bertills eds.). Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm.
  92. Popovic B. 1992. Changes in soil, plant nutrient content and tree growth during a 5-year period on Norway spruce plots under different liming regimes in south Sweden. pp. 821- 822. In Responses of Forest Ecosystems to Environmental Changes (Teller A ed.). Springer, Dordrecht.
  93. Potthoff M, N Asche, B Stein, A Muhs and F Beese. 2008. Earthworm communities in temperate beech wood forest soils affected by liming. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44:247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.05.004
  94. Prietzel J, KE Rehfuess, U Stetter and H Pretzsch. 2008. Changes of soil chemistry, stand nutrition, and stand growth at two Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sites in Central Europe during 40 years after fertilization, liming, and lupine introduction. Eur. J. For. Res. 127:43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0181-7
  95. Priha O and A Smolander. 1994. Fumigation-extraction and substrate-induced respiration derived microbial biomass C, and respiration rate in limed soil of Scots pine sapling stands. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17:301-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383986
  96. Rask M, RI Jones, M Jarvinen, A Paloheimo, M Salonen, J Syvaranta and M Verta. 2007. Changes in fish mercury concentrations over 20 years in an acidified lake subject to experimental liming. Appl. Geochem. 22:1229-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.03.015
  97. Reid C and SA Watmough. 2014. Evaluating the effects of liming and wood-ash treatment on forest ecosystems through systematic meta-analysis. Can. J. For. Res. 44:867-885. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0488
  98. Reif A, ED Schulze, J Ewald and A Rothe. 2014. Forest liming- soil protection versus nature conservation? Waldokologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz 14:5-29.
  99. Renberg I and H Hultberg. 1992. A paleolimnological assessment of acidification and liming effects on diatom assemblages in a Swedish lake. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 49:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-007
  100. Rodenkirchen H. 1992. Effects of acidic precipitation, fertilization and liming on the ground vegetation in coniferous forests of southern Germany. Water Air Soil Pollut. 61:279- 294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00482611
  101. Rosberg I, J Frank and AO Stuanes. 2006. Effects of liming and fertilization on tree growth and nutrient cycling in a Scots pine ecosystem in Norway. For. Ecol. Manage. 237:191- 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.045
  102. Rusek J and VG Marshall. 2000. Impacts of airborne pollutants on soil fauna. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:395-423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.395
  103. Saarsalmi A and E Malkonen. 2001. Forest fertilization research in Finland: A literature review. Scand. J. For. Res. 16:514-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580152699358
  104. Saarsalmi A, P Tamminen, M Kukkola and T Levula. 2011. Effects of liming on chemical properties of soil, needle nutrients and growth of Scots pine transplants. For. Ecol. Manage. 262:278-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.033
  105. Safford LO. 1974. Effect of fertilization on biomass and nutrient content of fine roots in a beech-birch-maple stand. Plant Soil 40:349-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011517
  106. Schaaf W and RF Huttl. 2006. Experiences with liming in European countries - Results of long-term experiments. J. For. Sci. 52:35-44. https://doi.org/10.17221/10158-JFS
  107. Schaffner WR. 1989. Effects of neutralization and addition of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on the limnetic zooplankton communities of two acidic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:295-305. https://doi.org/10.1139/f89-040
  108. Schneider BU and W Zech. 1990. The influence of Mg fertilization on growth and mineral contents of fine roots in Picea abies (Karst. L.) stands at different stages of decline in NE-Bavaria. Water Air Soil Pollut. 54:469-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385239
  109. Schofield CL and C Keleher. 1996. Comparison of brook trout reproductive success and recruitment in an acidic Adirondack lake following whole lake liming and watershed liming. Biogeochemistry 32:323-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187144
  110. Schonau APG and MA Herbert. 1983. Relationship between growth rate, fertilizing and foliar nutrient concentrations for Eucalyptus grandis; preliminary investigations. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 4:369-380.
  111. Shah Z, WA Adamst and CDV Have. 1990. Composition and activity of the microbial population in an acidic upland soil and effects of liming. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22:257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90095-H
  112. Sikstrom U. 1997. Effects of low-dose liming and nitrogen fertilization on stemwood growth and needle properties of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. For. Ecol. Manage. 95:261- 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00025-X
  113. Smolander A and E Malkonen. 1994. Microbial biomass C and N in limed soil of Norway spruce stands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26:503-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90183-X
  114. Stenson JAE and JE Svensson. 1995. Changes of planktivore fauna and development of zooplankton after liming of the acidified lake Gardsjon. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85:979-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00476957
  115. Svensson JE and JAE Stenson. 2002. Responses of planktonic rotifers to restoration measures-trophic cascades after liming in lake Gardsjon. Arch. Hydrobiol. 153:301-322. https://doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/153/2002/301
  116. Van den Burg J. 1991. Results and experiences from fertilization experiments in the Netherlands. Fertil. Res. 27:107- 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048613
  117. Warfvinge P and H Sverdrup. 1988. Watershed liming. Lake Reserv. Manag. 4:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/07438148809354384
  118. Westling O and T Zetterberg. 2007. Recovery of acidified streams in forests treated by total catchment liming. Water Air Soil Pollut. 7:347-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9107-5
  119. Wilmot TR, DS Ellsworth and MT Tyree. 1996. Base cation fertilization and liming effects on nutrition and growth of Vermont sugar maple stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 84:123- 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(96)03743-7
  120. Yoo JH, JK Byun, CS Kim and WK Lee. 1998. Effects of lime, magnesium sulfate and compound fertilizers on soil chemical properties of acidified forest soils. J. Korean. For. Soc. 87:341-346.
  121. Zelles L, I Scheunert and K Kreutzer. 1987. Effect of artificial irrigation, acid precipitation and liming on the microbial activity in soil of a spruce forest. Biol. Fertil. Soils 4:137-143.
  122. Zelles L, K Stepper and A Zsolnay. 1990. The effect of lime on microbial activity in spruce (Picea abies L.) forests. Biol. Fertil. Soils 9:78-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335866