DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Algorithm-based SW education using micro-bit on elementary school students' creativity

마이크로비트를 활용한 알고리즘 기반 SW교육이 초등학생 창의성에 미치는 효과

  • Received : 2018.04.02
  • Accepted : 2018.04.26
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a software education program using micro:bit based on the ADDIE development model and to analyze the effects of the development of creativity of elementary school students. The education program was developed based on the results of the pre-demand analysis conducted on 40 elementary school teachers in Jeju. In order to verify the effectiveness of the developed education program, 42 students who participated in the education donation program conducted by ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$ University were enrolled in 24 hours for 7 days for 6 days. The results of the analysis show that the software education program developed in this study has positive effects on the creativity factors by improving the programming ability of elementary school students.

본 연구는 초등학생의 창의력 향상을 위한 교육적 방안으로 마이크로비트를 활용한 소프트웨어 교육 프로그램을 ADDIE 개발 모형을 기반으로 개발하여 적용한 후 효과를 분석하였다. 교육 프로그램은 현직 초등학교 교사 40명을 대상으로 실시한 사전 요구분석 결과를 바탕으로 하여 개발하였다. 개발한 교육 프로그램의 효과를 검증하기 위해 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$대학교에서 실시한 교육기부 프로그램의 지원자 24명을 대상으로 6일 동안 1일 7차시씩 42차시를 진행하였다. Torrance의 TTCT 검사를 활용하여 사전 사후 검사를 실시하고 교육적 효과를 분석하였으며, 분석 결과, 본 연구에서 개발한 소프트웨어교육 프로그램이 초등학생의 프로그래밍 능력을 향상시켜 창의력 요소들에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Software Policy & Research Institute (2014), Software Oriented Society: The Meaning and the Response, Issue Report 2014-003
  2. Yang, B., Gil, H., Kim, Y (2016). Effective Online Software Education System for Elementary and Secondary School, Software Policy & Research Institute.
  3. Wells, D. (2012). Computing in Schools: Time to Move Beyond ICT? Research in Secondary Teacher Education, 2(1), 8-13.
  4. Ministry of Education (2015). Software Education Guideline.
  5. Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2013). Imagining, Creating, Playing, Sharing, Reflecting: How Online Community Supports Young People as Designers of Interactive Media. In C. Mouza and N. Lavigne (eds.), Emerging Technologies for Classroom, Springer. 253-268.
  6. Williams, A. B. (2003). The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTROMS robots to teach computer enginnering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2002.808260
  7. Major, L. Kyriacou, T. Brereton, O. P. (2012). Systemic literature review: teaching novices programming using robots. IET software, 6(6), 502-513. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0125
  8. Hong, J. Kim, Y. (2018). Development and Application Effect of STEAM Program Using Robots. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(1), 17-24.
  9. Yoo, I., Bae, Y., Kim, W., Choi, J., Kim, M., Jeon, J. (2018). The Development and Application of STEAM Education in Robot Programming. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(1), 157-164.
  10. Kim, H (2016). A Study of the Direction for Developing Software Education Operating Guide. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 529-548.
  11. Schmidt, A. (2016). Increasing Computer Literacy with the BBC micro:bit. IIEEE Pervasive Computing, 15(2), 5-7.
  12. Ball, T. et al., (2016). Microsoft Touch Develop and the BBC micro:bit. 2016 IEEE/ACM 28th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), 637-640.
  13. Micro:bit Educational Foundation. micro:bit homepage, 2015. URL: http://microbit.org/ [cited 2017. 05. 01]
  14. Bradley, S. & Gibson, S. (2017). A study of Northern Ireland Key Stage 2 pupil's perceptions of using the BBC Micro:bit in STEM education. The STeP Journal: Student Teacher Perspectives. 4(1), 15-41.
  15. Hong Sun Jeong (2006). Intelligence and creativity : Psychological inquiry For Human intelligence. Yangseowon : Seoul.
  16. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827
  17. Torrance, E. P. (1978). Giftedness in solving furture problems. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1978.tb00162.x
  18. Tugun, V. et at., (2017). Coding Education in a Flipped Classroom. Technology Education Management Infomatics (TEM Journal), 6(3), 599-606.
  19. The effect of EPL Programming Based on CPS model for enhancing elementary school students' Creativity. In: Park J., Jeong YS., Park., Chen HC. (eds) Embedded and Multipedia Computing Technology and Service. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 181, Springer, Dordrecht, 237-244.
  20. Choi, J. (2015). Puzzle-Based Algorithm Learning Model for Improving Computational Thinking for Informatics Gifted Students. Korean National University of Education. PhD Thesis.
  21. Young Min Seo, Young Jun Lee (2010). A Subject Integration Robot Programming Instruction Model to Enhance the Creativity of Information Gifted Students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 13(1) ,pp 19-26.
  22. Jiyae Noh (2017). The Effects of SW Education Using Robot. Ewha Women's University. PhD Thesis.
  23. Park, K. (2016). An Approach for Creative Activity Using of Embedded Computer and Software Developing Tools. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 221-239.
  24. Jae Sung Jang (2017). The Effect of STEAM program using physical computing for elementary students creativity and collaboration ability. Gwangju National University of Education. Master's Thesis.
  25. Kim Kyung Hee (2006b). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
  26. Kim Kyung Hee (2006a). Can we trust creativity tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking(TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2
  27. Torrance, E. P. (2010). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Directions manual and scoring guide (Figual test booklet A), Korean FPSP.