DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors affecting Crop Damage by the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) : A case study in Geochang County, Gyeongnam Province, Korea

멧돼지(Sus scrofa)에 의한 농작물 피해 요인 분석 -경남 거창군 사례를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2017.04.17
  • Accepted : 2018.04.04
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Wild boars have expanded their habitats in Korea in recent years and caused serious social problems such as crop damage and appearance in urban areas. This study was carried out from May to October 2012 to investigate the environmental factors that affect crop damage based on actual cases reported in Geochang County of Gyeongnam Province, Korea. The analysis showed that the damages by wild boars occurred mainly between August and September, and rice was damaged most often while sweet potatoes were damaged most intensely. The results indicated that the damages were related to the wild boars' preference of crop and the seasonal availability of crops. Other factors that affected the crop damage included the slope, the topographic relief, and the distances from forest, stream, road, and residential area. There was no significant difference of environmental factor according to damage intensity, suggesting that the wild boars tended to attack the same cropland repeatedly and thus accumulating the damage. Our study suggests that reducing crop damages by wild boars will require cultivating crops less preferred by wild boars, installing electric fences, and controlling wild boar population with hunting and trapping.

최근 국내 멧돼지 문제는 농작물 피해 및 도심 출몰로 인하여 사회적으로 심각한 상황에 직면해 있다. 본 연구는 경남 거창군의 멧돼지에 의한 농작물 피해사례를 바탕으로 피해에 영향을 끼치는 환경 요인들에 대하여 파악하고자 2012년 5월부터 10월까지 수행 되었다. 농작물 피해 분석 결과 주로 8월과 9월 사이 피해가 가장 많이 발생하였고, 벼의 빈도가 가장 높았으며 피해 강도는 고구마가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 멧돼지의 농작물 선호성과 특정시기에 대한 가용성과 관련이 있는 것으로 판단된다. 또한 농작물 피해에 경사, 지형기복, 산림과의 거리, 수계로부터의 거리, 도로로부터의 거리, 주거지로부터의 거리의 요인들이 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 피해 강도에 따른 환경요인의 차이는 나타지 않아 멧돼지는 한번 피해를 끼친 농경지를 지속적으로 방문하여 피해를 누적 시키는 것으로 파악된다. 따라서 멧돼지에 의한 농작물 피해를 저감시키기 위해서는 피해가 발생할 수 있는 곳에 멧돼지가 비선호하는 작물로 대체 재배하며 전기펜스 설치, 엽사와 포획틀을 이용한 멧돼지 개체수 조절이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amichi, A., F.Serrani, C.M. Rossi and R. Primi(2012) Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the "refuge effect". Agronomy for sustainable development 32(3): 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0057-6
  2. Bleier, N., R. Lehoczki, D. Ujvary, L. Szemethy and S. Csanyi (2012) Relationships between wild ungulates density and crop damage in Hungary. Acta Theriologica 57: 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0082-0
  3. Cai, J., Z. Jiang, Y. Zeng, C. Li and B.D. Bravery(2008) Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a gian panda reserve. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0203-x
  4. Conover, M.(2002) Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Science of Wildlife Damage Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 418pp.
  5. Geisser, H. and H.U. Reyer(2004) Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 939-946. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0939:EOHFAF]2.0.CO;2
  6. Geochang County.(2012) Statical year book of Geochang. Geochang, 473pp. (in Korean)
  7. Herrero, J., A. Garcia-Serrano, S. Couto, VM. Ortuno, and R. Garcia-Gonzalez(2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52: 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3
  8. Honda, T.(2005) Evaluation of simple fences in preventing wild boar(Sus scrofa) damage to agricultural crops: Verification from factor "installation and maintenance". Wildlife Conservation Japan 9: 93-102.
  9. Honda, T. and M. Sugita(2007) Environmental factors affecting damage by wild boars (Sus scrofa) to rice fields in Yamanashi Prefecture, central Japan. Mammals Study 32(4): 173-176. https://doi.org/10.3106/1348-6160(2007)32[173:EFADBW]2.0.CO;2
  10. Honda, T., Y. Miyagawa, H. Ueda and M. Inoue(2009) Effectiveness of newly-designed electric fences in reducing crop damage by medium and large mammals. Mammals Study34(1): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.3106/041.034.0103
  11. Hone, J.(2007) Wildlife Damage Control, CSIRO Publishing, Victoria 179pp.
  12. Hone, J. and B. Atkinson(1983) Evaluation of fencing to control feral pig movement. Australian Wildlife Research 10: 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9830499
  13. Lee, S.M. and W.S. Lee(2014) Diet of The Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Agricultural Land of Geochang, Gyeonam Province, Korea. Journal of Korea Forest Society 103(2): 307-312. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.2.307
  14. Mazzoni della Stella, R., F. Calovi, and L. Burrini(1995) The wild boar management in a province of the central Italy. Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 213-216.
  15. McIlroy, J.C.(1995) New techniques for an old problem-recent advances in feral pig control in Australia. Journal of Mountain Ecology3: 241-244.
  16. Ministry of Environment(MoE).(2014) Habitat Use Characteristics and Development of Damage Prevention Technique in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), Sejong, Korea, 229pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Naughton-Treves, L.(1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale national park, Uganda. Conservation Biology 12: 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x
  18. Reidy, M.M., T.A. Campbell and D.G. Hewitt(2008) Evaluation of electric fencing to inhibit feral pig movements. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72(4): 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-158
  19. Schlageter, A. and D. Haag-Wackernagel(2012) Evaluation of an odor repellent for protecting crops from wild boar damage. Journal of Pest Science 86(2): 209-215.
  20. Schley, L., D. Dufrene, A. Krier, A.C. Frantz(2008) Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0183-x
  21. Schley, L. and T.J. Roper(2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33(1): 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00010.x
  22. Thapa, S.(2010) Effectiveness of crop protection methods against wildlife damage: A case study of two village at Bardia National Park, Nepal. Crop Protection 29: 1297-1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.06.015