한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제32권2호
  • /
  • Pages.231-243
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

방문객 유형별 이용객수에 대한 규범적 평가기준, 혼잡지각과 치유경험방해 지각: '장성 편백치유의 숲'의 '치유필드'를 대상으로

Normative Standards on Number of Users, Perceived Conflict, and Perceived Interference of Healing Experience by Types of Visitors at 'Healing Field' of 'Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest'

  • 김상오 (전남대학교 농생대 임학과) ;
  • 김상미 (전라남도 산림자원연구소)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.09
  • 심사 : 2018.04.11
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 방문객 유형별로 장성 편백치유의 숲(Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest: JPHF) 내 '치유필드'의 이용객수에 대한 지각(perceived number of users: PNU)과 이용객수에 대한 평가기준(evaluative standards)을 설정, 비교하기 위해 시행되었다. 2017년 9월 중 JPHF 내 '치유필드' 이용객을 대상으로 편의표본추출 방법을 통해 선정된 158명의 표본으로부터 설문지기법을 이용하여 자료를 수집하였다. 치유필드 방문객 중 휴양객(일반 휴양을 목적으로 한 방문객)은 49.3%, 치유객(건강 및 치유를 목적으로 한 방문객) 15.3%, 휴치객(휴양과 치유를 동일정도로 추구하는 방문객) 35.3%로 구성되어 있었다. 응답자가 지각하는 치유필드 이용객수는 전체적으로는 평균 23.8명(중앙값: 20.0명)으로 나타났으며, 방문객 유형별 평균범위는 21.1-27.8명(중앙값: 20.0명 동일)으로 조사되었다. 응답자의 PNU는 혼잡지각(perceived crowding: PC)(r=0.23) 및 치유경험 방해 지각(perceived interference of healing experience: PIHE) (r=0.20)과 낮은 상관관계를 나타냈다. 방문객 유형 간에 치유필드 적정이용객수(optimal number of users: ONU)는 차이가 없었다. 전체적으로 적정이용객수는 평균 28.9명(중앙값: 25.0명)으로 나타났으며 방문객 유형별 적정이용객수 범위는 평균 25.4-31.4명(중앙값: 25.0-27.5명)으로 분석되었다. 또한 최대 허용가능 이용객수(maximum acceptable number of users: MANU)는 전체적으로 38.1명으로 나타났으며, 방문객 유형별로는 휴양객 36.9명, 치유객 32.0명, 휴치객 38.0명으로 각각 조사되었다. 방문객 유형별로는 MANU에 차이가 없었다. 응답자의 PC는 평균 2.73(SD: 3.26, 9점 척도), PIHE는 평균 3.26(SD: 1.77, 9점 척도)으로 나타났으며 방문객 유형별로는 휴치객이 휴양객에 비해 통계적으로 높은 PC와 PIHE를 보였다. PNU가 ONU를 초과한 그룹은 그렇지 않은 그룹에 비해 높은 PC와 PIHE를 나타냈다. 연구결과를 토대로 관리적 관점에서의 시사점을 제시하였으며 본 연구의 한계점과 추후 연구에 대하여 토의하였다.

This study was conducted to determine and compare the perceived number of users (PNU) and evaluative standards for each type of visitors to "Healing Field" of Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest (JPHF). Data were collected from 158 samples selected by convenient sampling method from the users of "Healing Field" in JPHF during September 2017. Visitors to "Healing Field" consisted of 49.3% for recreation (VR), 15.3% for healing (VH), and 35.3% for both recreation and healing (VRH). Respondents' average PNU was 23.8 (median: 20.0), and the range of average PNU by visitor type was 21.1-27.8 (median: 20.0). Respondents' PNU showed low correlations with perceived crowding (PC) (r=0.23) and perceived interference of healing experience (PIHE) (r=0.20). There were no differences in the optimal number of users (ONU) of "Healing Field" among the types of visitors. The overall average ONU was 28.9(median: 25.0), and the range of average ONU by types of visitors was 25.4-31.4 (median: 25.0-27.5). The overall maximum acceptable number of users (MANU) was 38.1, and MANU for VR, VH, and VRH was 36.9, 32.0, and 38.0, respectively. Respondents' mean PC was 2.73 (SD: 3.26, 9-point scale) while mean PIHE was 3.26 (SD: 1.77, 9-point scale). The VRH group showed a higher PC and PIHE than the VR group. The group with greater PNU than ONU showed higher PC and PIHE than the other groups. Based on the results, this paper presented some managerial implications, discussed the limitations of the study, and suggested the further studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson L.E. and D.K. Loomis(2012) Normative standards for coral reef conditions: A comparison of scuba divers by specialization level. Journal of Leisure Research 44: 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2012.11950264
  2. Bae, M.K. and B.M. Chang(2003) An analysis of social carrying capacity in natural park. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 30: 79-97. (in Korean with English abstract)
  3. Bultena, G., D. Field , P. Womble and D. Albrecht(1981) Closing the gates: A study of backcountry use-limitation at Mount McKinley National Park. Leisure Sciences 4: 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408109512966
  4. Han, S.Y. and H.G. Kwon(2009) The evaluation of socio-psychological carrying capacity based on marginal utility theory model: The case study of Bukhansan National Park. Journal of Korean Forest Society 98: 297-304. (in Korean with English abstract)
  5. Kim, S.O.(2010) Visitors' perceived healthfulness of Chukryongsan 'Therapeutic Forest' and influential factors. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment 13: 41-51. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Kim, S.O. and S.M. Kim(2014) Effects of encounter number on perceived crowding and healthfulness in a healing forest. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment 17: 73-80. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2014.17.1.073
  7. Kim, S.O. and S.M. Kim(2018) 'Jangseong Pyunbaek Healing Forest(JPHF)' visitors: Socio-demographic characteristics, use patterns and motivational factors by types of visitors. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 32: 203-214. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.2.203
  8. Kim, S.O. and B. Shelby(2005) Developing standards for trail conditions using image capture technology. Leisure Sciences 27: 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400590930916
  9. Kim, S.O. and B. Shelby(2006) Comparing onsite and offsite methods for measuring norms for trail impacts. Environmental Management 37: 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0317-1
  10. Kim, S.O. and B. Shelby(2009) Effects of movement when using visual media to determine encounter standards. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23: 309-316.
  11. Kim, S.O., B. Shelby and M.D. Needham(2014) Effects of facility developments and encounter levels on perceptions of settings, crowding, and norms in a Korean park. Environmental Management 53:441-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0207-5
  12. Kim, S.O. and K.I. Oh(1998) Evaluation of the present managerial conditions based on the established social and ecological impact standards and some suggestions: In Moodeung-san Provincial Park. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 25: 107-122. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Korea National Park Service(2007) Carrying capacity management system research. 252p.
  14. Kwon, Y.S., K.J, Lee and K.J. Song(1988) A study on the estimation of user's psychological carrying capacity in Mt. Chi-ak National Park Campsite. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 16: 1-12. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Kwon, T.H., S.H. Choi and K.K. Oh(2001) Estimation of carrying capacity on the Mountainous National Park using the impact rating class of trail (1): In the case study of Bukhansan National Park. Korean. Journal of Environment and Ecology 15: 257-266.
  16. Lee, H.(2000) Analysis of causal structure on the formation and influence of crowding perception for winter tourists at a beach resort. Journal of Tourism Sciences 23: 47-67. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Lee, K.J., J.S. Kim and J.S Woo(1987) Recreation impacts on soil and vegetation and estimation of psychological carrying capacity in Mt. Bukhan National Park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 14: 46-65. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Lee, K.J, K.K. Oh and J.C. Jo(1987) Carrying capacity estimation and management planning of the Seonjeong Royal Tomb(II). Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 15: 2079-2090. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Li, H. and T.H. Kang(2012) A study on the ecological carrying capacity of Donggung and Wolji, Gyeongju: Centering around the used pattern and damage degree of trail routes. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40: 70-78. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.6.070
  20. Manning, R. E.( 2011) Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 468pp.
  21. Manning, R. E., S. Lawson, P. Newman, D. Laven and W. Valliere(2002) Methodological issues in measuring crowding-related norms in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences 24: 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400290050781
  22. Marin L.D., P. Newman, R. Manning, J.J. Vaske and D. Stack(2011) Motivation and acceptability norms of human-caused sound in Muir Woods National Monument. Leisure Sciences 33: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.550224
  23. Needham, M.D., B.W. Szuster and C.M. Bell(2011) Encounter norms, social carrying capacity indicators, and standards of quality at a marine protected area. Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.06.004
  24. Needham, M.D., R. Rollins and C. Wood(2004) Site-specific encounters, norms and crowding of summer visitors at alpine ski areas. International Journal of Tourism Research 6: 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.504
  25. Needham, M.D. and R.B. Rollins(2005) Interest group standards for recreation and tourism impacts at ski areas in the summer. Tourism Management 26: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.015
  26. Park, J.N., S.K. Lee and H.S. Lee(2009) An estimation of tourist satisfaction and social psychological carrying capacity in relation to the perceived crowding in a nature recreation facility. Journal of Tourism Sciences 33: 93-110. (in Korean with English abstract)
  27. Ruddell, E.J. and J.H. Gramann(1991) Extending the goal-interference model of recreation conflict: An analysis of the role of personal norms in noise-induced conflict. Paper presented at the third symposium on social science in resource management. College Station, TX, August 1991.
  28. Shafer, E.L.(1969). The average camper who doesn't exist. U.S.D.A. Forest Service research paper NE-142, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 27pp.
  29. Shelby, B., J. Vaske and M.P. Donnelly(1996) Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences 18: 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409609513276
  30. Shelby, B., J. Vaske and R. Harris(1988) User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Journal of Leisure Research 20: 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1988.11969778
  31. Shelby, B. and R. Colvin(1982) Encounter measures in carrying capacity research: actual, reported, and diary contacts. Journal of Leisure Research 14: 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1982.11969531
  32. Shelby, B. and T.A. Heberlein(1986) Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
  33. Shin, W.S., H.G. Kwon and S.Y Han(2007) Crowding and socio-psychological carrying capacity in national park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 11: 43-50. (in Korean with English abstract)
  34. Vaske, J. J. and M.P. Donnelly(1988) Normative evaluations of wildlife management: A comparison of three publics. Paper presented at the annual congress of the National Parks and Recreation Association. Indianapolis, Indiana.
  35. Womble, P. and S. Studebaker(1981). Crowding in a national park campground: Katmai National Monument in Alaska. Environment and Behavior 13: 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135002