Journal of Practical Engineering Education (실천공학교육논문지)

Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education (한국실천공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on Basic Learning Ability Achievement in the Field of Basic Mechanics for Students with Poor Basic Learning Ability

기초학습능력 부진학생을 위한 기초역학 분야 기초학력강화 사례 연구

  • Lee, Jongkil (Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, College of Education, Andong National University)
  • 이종길 (안동대학교 사범대학 기계교육과)
  • Received : 2018.10.31
  • Accepted : 2018.11.13
  • Published : 2018.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many undergraduate engineering freshmen have difficulties in attending major courses due to their poor basic academic ability. Regardless of the university level it is a reality in universities all over the country. In order to solve the problems of poor learning and basic academic ability, in this study, students who want to major in mechanical engineering at A university, it was confirmed the effectiveness and surveyed the satisfaction with the questionnaire. The pre and post test results showed that the A group improved scores by 40.1% and the B group by 18.9%. Questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews conducted after the completion of the program. It showed that the basic learning ability achievement program was highly satisfied with the overall average of 90.6% (4.53/5.0) and an useful program which not only contributed to the interest in the major subjects and the confidence in the academic achievement but also build positive relationships between the student and professor.

대학 공학계열 신입생들 중 많은 학생들이 기초학력 저하로 전공과목 수강에 어려움을 겪고 있으며 이는 대학 수준에 관계 없이 전국의 모든 대학에서 나타나는 현실이기도 하다. 이러한 학습부진과 기초학력 저하를 해결하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 A대학에서 기계공학을 전공하려는 학생들 중 기초역학에 대한 학습능력이 부족한 학생들을 대상으로 기초학력강화 프로그램을 운영하고 사전 및 사후 검사 결과를 통하여 그 실효성을 확인하고 설문조사를 통하여 만족도를 조사하였다. 사전 사후 검사 결과 A집단에서는 평균 40.1% 향상되었으며 B집단에서는 평균 18.9% 향상된 것으로 조사되었다. 프로그램 이수 후 실시한 만족도 조사 및 심층 면담 결과 기초학력강화 프로그램은 전체 평균 90.6%(4.53/5.0)의 높은 만족도를 나타내어 전공 과목에 대한 흥미와 학업에 대한 자신감을 높이는데 기여 했을 뿐 아니라 교수와 참여 학생과의 긍정적인 관계 형성에 큰 도움을 준 유용한 프로그램임을 확인하였다.

Keywords

HSCGCO_2018_v10n2_95_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 연구수행 절차 개념도 Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the research procedure.

HSCGCO_2018_v10n2_95_f0002.png 이미지

그림 2. A 집단에서의 프로그램 이수전과 이수후의 점수 변화 Fig. 2. Score variation before and after completion of the program in group A.

HSCGCO_2018_v10n2_95_f0003.png 이미지

그림 3. B 집단에서의 프로그램 이수전과 이수후의 점수 변화 Fig. 3. Score variation before and after completion of the program in group B.

HSCGCO_2018_v10n2_95_f0004.png 이미지

그림 4. 기초학력강화 프로그램 만족도에 대한 설문조사 결과 Fig. 4. Results of questionnaire survey on satisfaction level of basic learning ability achievement program.

HSCGCO_2018_v10n2_95_f0005.png 이미지

그림 5. 프로그램 만족도 조사 결과(5.0 척도) Fig. 5. Program satisfaction level survey results(5.0 scale).

References

  1. J. R. Kwon, "Comparison on proficient level and below basic level students' mathematical achievement in the national achievement evaluation and assessment," Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29-50, February, 2012.
  2. Y. Pyo and J. Park, "Effective management strategies of basic mathematics for low achievement students in university general mathematics," Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 525-541, September 2010.
  3. J. Lee, S. Lee, H. Kwon, and G. Lee, "The effect of basic mathematical ability improvement program on scholastic achievement and scholastic motivation: A case study on engineering freshmen in D university," Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 167-184, February 2011.
  4. C. Yang and S. Kang, "Some thoughts on improvement in basic academic ability: In case of English and Mathematics," The Journal of Science of Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 313-325, 2002.
  5. M. Chung and Y. Yang, "A study on basic learning ability support system for university students: based on professors and students' perception and needs," Journal of Educational Culture Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 101-126, 2016.
  6. H. Lee, "Analysis of main factors for college students underachievement," Journal of Human Society, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 653-672, 2016.
  7. S. Kim and H. Chae, "Effectiveness of a program for improving learning competency of underachievers at university," Theory and Practice of Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 25-45, December 2015.
  8. J. Shin, S. Yun, and Y. Kim, "Efficient teaching method for the underachieving students through level differentiated classes," Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, vol 28, no. 1, pp. 81-96, February 2014.
  9. J. Kim and J. Lee, "A study on learning achievement gap in the secondary curriculum in accordance with the teaching methods of materials processing section," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107-112, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2015.107
  10. J. Jang and J. Lee, "Learning outcomes analysis using by degree of concept and repetition learning of motion mechanics," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 46-52, 2012.
  11. J. Lee, "A study to promote the academic-performance of college students: Based on the readiness model of higher education in the united states," Korean Journal of Comparative Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 103-123, 2007.
  12. Y. Kim, "Application of MS excel in teaching statics," Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers C, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21-28, 2014.