Yonsei Medical Journal

Yonsei Univ College Medicine (연세대학교의과대학)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Central Line Bundle Compliance on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

  • Lee, Kyoung Hwa (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Nan Hyoung (Department of Infection Control, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Jeong, Su Jin (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Mi Na (Department of Infection Control, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Han, Sang Hoon (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Young Goo (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.10.18
  • Accepted : 2018.02.06
  • Published : 2018.05.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of central line (CL) bundle compliance on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in different departments of the same hospital, including the intensive care unit (ICU) and other departments. Materials and Methods: The four components of the CL bundle were hand hygiene, use of maximal sterile barrier precautions, chlorhexidine use, and selection of an appropriate site for venous access. Compliance of the CL bundle and CLABSIs were measured for every department [emergency room (ER), ICU, general ward (GW), and operating room (OR)]. A total of 1672 patients were included over 3 years (August 2013 through July 2016). Results: A total of 29 CLABSI episodes (1.73%) were identified, and only 53.7% of the patients completed CL bundles. The performance rates of all components of the CL bundle were 22.3%, 28.5%, 36.5%, and 84.6% for the ER, ICU, GW, and OR, respectively. The highest CLABSI rate was observed in patients of the ICU, for whom all components were not performed perfectly. Conversely, the lowest CLABSI rate was observed for patients of GWs, for whom all components were performed. Among individual components, femoral insertion site [relative risk (RR), 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-4.68], not using a full body drape (RR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.44-8.71), and not performing all CL bundle components (RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.19-6.54) were significant variables associated with CLABSIs. Conclusion: This study provides direct evidence that completing all CL bundle components perfectly is essential for preventing CLABSIs. Customized education should be provided, according to specific weaknesses of bundle performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Stevens V, Geiger K, Concannon C, Nelson RE, Brown J, Dumyati G. Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:O318-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12600
  2. Ziegler MJ, Pellegrini DC, Safdar N. Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2015;43:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-014-0689-y
  3. Al-Rawajfah OM, Hewitt JB, Stetzer F, Cheema J. Length of stay and charges associated with health care-acquired bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:227-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.014
  4. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, Agarwal R, Williams K, Brennan PJ. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:101-14. https://doi.org/10.1086/657912
  5. Marschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M, Hadaway L, Kallen A, O'Grady NP, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35 Suppl 2:S89-107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0899823X00193870
  6. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1123-33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra011883
  7. Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, Blot S, Vandijck D. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu239
  8. Martinez-Morel HR, Sanchez-Paya J, Molina-Gomez MJ, Garcia-Shimizu P, Garcia Roman V, Villanueva-Ruiz C, et al. Catheter-related bloodstream infection: burden of disease in a tertiary hospital. J Hosp Infect 2014;87:165-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2014.04.008
  9. Choi JY, Kwak YG, Yoo H, Lee SO, Kim HB, Han SH, et al. Trends in the incidence rate of device-associated infections in intensive care units after the establishment of the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J Hosp Infect 2015;91:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.002
  10. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al.; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257
  11. Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:257-66. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00001
  12. Wang H, Huang T, Jing J, Jin J, Wang P, Yang M, et al. Effectiveness of different central venous catheters for catheter-related infections: a network meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 2010;76:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2010.04.025
  13. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725-32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061115
  14. Jeong IS, Park SM, Lee JM, Song JY, Lee SJ. Effect of central line bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:710-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.010
  15. Furuya EY, Dick A, Perencevich EN, Pogorzelska M, Goldmann D, Stone PW. Central line bundle implementation in US intensive care units and impact on bloodstream infections. PLoS One 2011;6:e15452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015452
  16. Longmate AG, Ellis KS, Boyle L, Maher S, Cairns CJ, Lloyd SM, et al. Elimination of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infections from the intensive care unit. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.037200
  17. Ong A, Dysert K, Herbert C, Laux L, Granato J, Crawford J, et al. Trends in central line-associated bloodstream infections in a trauma-surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg 2011;146:302-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.9
  18. McLaws ML, Burrell AR. Zero risk for central line-associated bloodstream infection: are we there yet? Crit Care Med 2012;40:388-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232e4f3
  19. Furuya EY, Dick AW, Herzig CT, Pogorzelska-Maziarz M, Larson EL, Stone PW. Central line-associated bloodstream infection reduction and bundle compliance in intensive care units: a national study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:805-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.67
  20. Conrick-Martin I, Foley M, Roche FM, Fraher MH, Burns KM, Morrison P, et al. Catheter-related infection in Irish intensive care units diagnosed with HELICS criteria: a multi-centre surveillance study. J Hosp Infect 2013;83:238-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2012.11.020
  21. Apisarnthanarak A, Thongphubeth K, Yuekyen C, Warren DK, Fraser VJ. Effectiveness of a catheter-associated bloodstream infection bundle in a Thai tertiary care center: a 3-year study. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:449-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.017
  22. Lee DH, Jung KY, Choi YH. Use of maximal sterile barrier precautions and/or antimicrobial-coated catheters to reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:947-50. https://doi.org/10.1086/590356
  23. Kocazeybek B, Tokman HB. Prevalence of primary antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori in Turkey: a systematic review. Helicobacter 2016;21:251-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12272
  24. Comer A, Harris AD, Shardell M, Braun B, Belton BM, Wolfsthal SD, et al.; Attaining Safety for Patients through Interdisciplinary Risk Reduction Efforts (ASPIRRE) Subgroup. Web-based training improves knowledge about central line bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1219-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/662585
  25. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002
  26. Choi JY, Kwak YG, Yoo H, Lee SO, Kim HB, Han SH, et al. Trends in the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of causative pathogens of device-associated infection in Korean intensive care units from 2006 to 2013: results from the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS). J Hosp Infect 2016;92:363-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.12.012
  27. Kwak YG, Lee SO, Kim HY, Kim YK, Park ES, Jin HY, et al. Risk factors for device-associated infection related to organisational characteristics of intensive care units: findings from the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J Hosp Infect 2010;75:195-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2010.01.014
  28. Osorio J, alvarez D, Pacheco R, Gomez CA, Lozano A. [Implementation of an insertion bundle for preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections in an Intensive Care Unit in Colombia]. Rev Chilena Infectol 2013;30:465-73. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182013000500001
  29. Leung PO, Lin HL, Lin YH, Lai CC. Different compliance with central line insertion bundle between intensivist and nonintensivist staff in intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:601-3.
  30. Liang HW, Lin HL. Compliance with central line insertion bundles in an intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:581-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.011
  31. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, et al.; 3SITES Study Group. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1220-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500964
  32. Arvaniti K, Lathyris D, Blot S, Apostolidou-Kiouti F, Koulenti D, Haidich AB. Cumulative evidence of randomized controlled and observational studies on catheter-related infection risk of central venous catheter insertion site in ICU patients: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2017;45:e437-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002092
  33. Ling ML, Apisarnthanarak A, Jaggi N, Harrington G, Morikane K, Thu le TA, et al. APSIC guide for prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0116-5
  34. Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, Suleiman N, Hill LA, Bruso PA, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15(4 Pt 1):231-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/30145574
  35. Tang HJ, Lin HL, Lin YH, Leung PO, Chuang YC, Lai CC. The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:356. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-356

Cited by

  1. Interventions to reduce unnecessary central venous catheter use to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in adults: A systematic review vol.39, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.250
  2. Increased Incidence of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infection in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intra-Peritoneal Chemotherapy vol.20, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.250
  3. Achieving a Zero Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rate in 4 Critical Care Units in Lebanon vol.42, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000335
  4. Failure of central venous catheter insertion and care bundles in a high central line–associated bloodstream infection rate, high bed occupancy hospital vol.48, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.11.018
  5. 중심정맥관 번들이행에 따른 중심정맥관 균집락과 중심정맥관 관련 혈류감염: CHG테가덤과 일반테가덤 드레싱비교연구 vol.50, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.19215
  6. Enhancing Obstetric Safety Through Best Practices vol.30, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8878
  7. Análise das práticas assistenciais para prevenção das infecções primárias da corrente sanguínea vol.20, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.56251
  8. Factors Associated with Intention to Comply with Infection Control Guidelines in Physicians and Nurses: An Analysis Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior vol.28, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.4.482
  9. Assessment of Knowledge on the Prevention of Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections among Intensive Care Nurses in Poland-A Prospective Multicentre Study vol.18, pp.23, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312672