KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of NIMBY Facilities Route Planning Considering Social Conflict

사회적 갈등을 고려한 비선호시설 노선 선정 개선 연구

  • 최영욱 (연세대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 이창준 (연세대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 한승헌 (연세대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Received : 2018.01.30
  • Accepted : 2018.04.17
  • Published : 2018.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In route selection process of NIMBY facilities, many conflicts occur due to route selection procedure and NIMBY syndrome. Especially, the social conflicts surrounding the site selection and operation are frequent enough to account for 70% of the total conflict cases, causing significant losses. To resolve the conflict in route selection, social conflicts are considered. Therefore, this study proposes an improved process of selecting route considering social conflicts in the power transmission line. First, the analysis of previous research trends and interviews with experts revealed the improved exclusion zone criteria, the factors and priorities of NIMBY facilities. After selecting the candidate routes, the optimal route is selected by using Fuzzy-TOPSIS. Hence, 83.3% of six experts have verified that this model minimizes conflicts and has sufficient applicability. The proposed model is expected to be used as a tool to minimize social conflict in the selection process of the power transmission line in the early stage of the project.

비선호시설의 노선선정 과정에서는 노선선정 절차, 지역주민의 NIMBY 현상 등으로 인해 많은 갈등이 발생하고 있다. 특히 입지선정과 운영을 둘러싼 사회적 갈등은 전체 갈등 사례 중 70%를 차지할 정도로 자주 발생하고 있으며, 갈등으로 인해 많은 손실을 야기하고 있다. 지속적인 갈등 해결을 위해서는 사회적 갈등을 고려한 최적 노선선정이 이루어져야 한다. 이에 본 연구는 송전선로 시설을 대상으로 사회적 갈등을 고려하여 개선된 경과지 선정 프로세스를 제시하고자 한다. 우선 기존 사회적 갈등에 관한 연구동향 분석 및 전문가 인터뷰를 통해 비선호시설의 개선된 배제구역 기준 및 고려인자와 우선순위를 도출하였다. 이후 도출된 배제구역 기준 및 고려인자를 실제 밀양시 사례를 대상으로 후보 노선을 선정하였으며, Fuzzy-TOPSIS를 활용하여 최적 노선을 선정하였다. 실무 측면에서 83.3%가 본 프로세스에 있어 사회적 갈등을 최소화하며 적용에 대한 타당성을 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 제시하고 있는 프로세스는 사업 초기 송전선로 경과지 선정과정에서 사회적 갈등을 최소화하기 위한 도구로써 활용이 가능할 것으로 예상된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) (2007). The design, construction, and operation of long-distance high-voltage electricity transmission technologies, Environmental Science Division, illinois.
  2. Cain, N. L. and Nelson, H. T. (2013). "What drives opposition to high-voltage transmission lines?" Land use policy, Vol. 33, pp. 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.003
  3. Chen, C. T. (2000). "Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decisionmaking under fuzzy environment." Fuzzy Set and Systems, Vol. 114, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
  4. Choi, H. S. (2012). "A study on the influencing factors of location conflicts by types of non-preferred facilities." Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 123-151 (in Korean).
  5. Department of Environment and Heritage protection (DEHP) (2013). Guideline-Landfill Siting, Design, Operation and Rehabilitation, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  6. DeVerteuil, G. (2013). "Where has NIMBY gone in urban social geography?" Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.800224
  7. ElectraNet. (2013). Land use guidelines for electricity transmission corridors, Adelaide, South Australia.
  8. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2006). EPRI-GTC overhead electric transmission line siting methodology, Georgia Transmission Corporation, Tucker, Georgia.
  9. Elliott, P. and Wadley, D. (2002). "The impact of transmission lines on property values: coming to terms with stigma." Property Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470210428347
  10. EROGLU, H. and Aydin, M. (2015). "Optimization of electrical power transmission lines routing using AHP, fuzzy AHP, and GIS." Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1418-1430. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1211-59
  11. Gitau, I. K. and Mundia, C. N. (2017). "GIS modeling for an optimal road route location: Case study of Moiben Kapcherop Kitale road." American Journal of Geographic Information System, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 26-39.
  12. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin.
  13. Jang, W., Hong, H. U., Han, S. H. and Baek, S. W. (2016). "Optimal supply vendor selection model for LNG plant projects using fuzzy-TOPSIS theory." Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 04016035-1-04016035-10.
  14. Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and application, Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork.
  15. Kim, D. H. (2003). "A comparative analysis of conflict structure of NIMBY and PIMFY facility location policies and policy countermeasures." Korean Local Government Conference, pp. 75-101 (in Korean).
  16. Kim, K. Y. (2017). Priority Decision for Energy Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. New and Renewable Energy, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 73-84. https://doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2017.9.13.3.073
  17. Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) (2017). Criteria for the implementation of power impact assessment, KEPCO (in Korean).
  18. Lee, J. D., Lee, J. K. and Kim, J. S. (2009). "Utilizing GIS for optimal route location in road planning step." Korean Contents Association Conference, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 467-471 (in Korean).
  19. Lee, H. Y. and Yun, S. J. (2013). "An analysis of news coverage on conflicts concerning transmission line construction in miryang - from a perspective of environmental justice." Economy & Society, pp. 40-76.
  20. Lee, S. W. and Hong, S. J. (2012). "A case study of resolving conflicts of building power lines." Korean Policy Science Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 183-212 (in Korean).
  21. Manawatu District Council (MDC). (2015). Plan Change 45-Feilding Growth, Feilding, New Zealand.
  22. Monteiro, C., Miranda, V., Ramirez-Rosado, I. J., Zorzano-Santamaria, P. J., Garcia-Garrido, E. and Fernandez-Jimenez, L. A. (2005). "Compromise seeking for power line path selection based on economic and environmental corridors." IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1422-1430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.852149
  23. Ra, N. S., Jang, H. S. and Bang, K. S. (2015). "The conflict of power transmission line establishment and the characteristics of litigation against it - Focused on the analysis of judicial precedents residential environment." Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 135-147 (in Korean).
  24. Roh, B. K. and Kim, J. B. (2009). "A study on the planning of railway route adjacent to the Preservation Area of cultural assets." Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 370-375 (in Korean).
  25. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making for Leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decision in a complex. world, RWS Publications.
  26. Sanudo, R., Luis Moura, J., Cordera, R. and Ibeas, A. (2017). "Optimal stopping location of a high speed train using GIS and multicriteria decision‐making." Transactions in GIS, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12204
  27. Schively, C. (2007). "Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research." CPL bibliography, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 255-266.
  28. Seo, D. H. (2016). "Environment justice of elderly people through Milyang transmission tower conflict." Journal of Critical Social Policy, Vol. 50, pp. 165-199 (in Korean).
  29. Stefansson, P., Saeporsdottir, A. D. and Hall, C. M. (2017). "When tourists meet transmission lines: The effects of electric transmission lines on tourism in Iceland." Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 34, pp. 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.032
  30. Vajjhala, S. P. and Fischbeck, P. S. (2007). "Quantifying siting difficulty: A case study of US transmission line siting." Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 650-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.026
  31. Veronesi, F., Schito, J., Grassi, S. and Raubal, M. (2017). "Automatic selection of weights for GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: site selection of transmission towers as a case study." Applied Geography, Vol. 83, pp. 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.001
  32. Yang, K. S. (2001). "An application of GIS-techniques for the selection of environmental optimum route." Journal of Transport Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 171-194 (In Korean).
  33. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). "Fuzzy sets." Information Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338-353.
  34. Zimmermann, H. J. (2001). Fuzzy Set Theory and its Application, Springer, Berlin.