Analysis on the Factors of Construction Disaster Applying the AHP

계층분석기법을 적용한 건설재해 영향요인 분석

  • 김은정 (조선이공대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.08
  • Accepted : 2018.02.13
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to figure out factors that can influence construction disaster. To address the goal, this author applied the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to draw the factors of construction disaster and figured out the order of priority of the factors. The data were collected through an AHP survey conducted to 150 people concerned in construction safety including those in the academic circles or in the public sector as well as hands-on workers. Also, the hierarchy of the disaster factors consists of human factors, managerial factors, installation factors, and equipment factors, and total 4 factors in stratum 1 and 37 subfactors were drawn. According to the AHP analysis results, the factors in stratum 1 influencing construction disaster the most are the human factors. The next are equipment factors, installation factors, and managerial factors in order. Regarding the factors of construction disaster finally drawn in consideration of their weight, safety consciousness is found to the most important out of 37 subfactors. The results of this study have given important implications for preventing accidents in construction.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn Hong-Seob, Kim Eun-jeung, Lee Gyu-jin, (2009), Falls from height-Prevention and risk control effectiveness, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency.
  2. Choi Soo-il, Kim Hong, (2006), A Study on the safety Climate and Worker's Safe Work Behavior in Construction site, Proceedings of the Korean Society of Safety, 21(5).
  3. H. w Heinrich, (1980), Industry Accident Prevention, 5th, Ed., New York, Mcgraw Hill Book Co, 22.
  4. Jin Hyeong-Seong, Lee Dong-Eun, (2013), Developing the Path Model defining the Relationship between Construction Worker's Personal Characteristics and Safety Behaviors, Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 13(2).
  5. Kim Sung-Hee, Jung Bung-Ho, Kim jae-kyung, (2002), Decision Analysis and its Application, 3rd ed,. Seoul, Yungji Publishers.
  6. Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, (2016), Industrial accident analysis.
  7. Lee Dae-seong, (2014), (A)study on cause analysis and improvement method for industrial accident in the plant construction project, Unpublished master's thesis, Hanyang University.
  8. Lee Hong, (1993), Causes of Industrial Accidents in Construction Industry : An Exploratory Study, Proceedings of the Korea Society of Safety, 8(4).
  9. Lee Man-Ho, (1993), Occurrence and Safety Management of Construction Accident, Construction Machinery Association.
  10. Lee Sun-Hee, Jeong Hwan-uk, Mun Jang-su, Sin Hyeon-sik, (1993), A Study on the Safety Consciousness Changing of Construction Workers for Accident Prevention, Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 13(1).
  11. Lee Wang-Gi, (2015), A study on safety importance and safety orientation on the main factors of industrial accidents, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology.
  12. Lee Myoung-Jae, (2016), The study of drawing safety accident factors and measurement plan in a small construction site, Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  13. Park Sang-Ryong, (1993), Am Empirical Study on determinants of Construction Accident and Injury, Unpublished master's thesis, Kwangwoon University.
  14. Shin Young-Ho, (2017), A Study on the Incident Causes of Confined Space and Management Measure, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology.
  15. Son Ho-kyung, (2010), A study on plan to improve safety management through building construction disaster factor analysis, Unpublished master's thesis, Yeungnam University.
  16. T, L, Saaty, (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, Mcgraw Hill Book Co.
  17. Yoo In-Geun, Choi sang-Chun, Cho Taek-Hee, Kim Chun-Han, (2006), A Study on the Safety Improvement Plan in Temporary Work, Proceeding of Korean Society for Railway, 145-150.