Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society (한국경영공학회지)

Korea Management Engineers Society (한국경영공학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Effects of Dynamic Capabilities and Value Orientation of SMEs and Venture Enterprises through Technological Innovation on Business Performance

중소벤처기업의 동적역량 및 가치지향성이 기술혁신을 통한 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • 이승권 (건국대학교 일반대학원 신산업융합학과) ;
  • 엄기수 (서일대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 이승배 (서일대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 이상진 (상명대학교 글로벌경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.03.02
  • Accepted : 2018.03.31
  • Published : 2018.03.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The results of this study are as follows: Dynamic capabilities and value orientation has a positive impact on technological innovation, and technological innovation also as a positive effect on business performance. In particular, the assimilation exploitation capabilities of dynamic capabilities have increased the technological innovation, while the absorptive transformation capabilities of dynamic capabilities have not. Variables affecting technological innovation have proven to be assimilation exploitation capabilities of dynamic capabilities. While the technological innovation orientation of value orientation influences technological innovation, it is concluded that the value orientation of customer orientation and social responsibility orientation do not. The results have shown that the value orientation that influences technological innovation is technological innovation orientation. SMEs will be able to enhance their business performance through technological innovation by developing assimilation exploitation capabilities and technological innovation orientation.

Keywords

References

  1. 김국태.허문구(2016), "동적역량과 경쟁우위: 환경동태성의 조절효과를 중심으로," 전략경영연구, 제19권, 제3호, pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.17786/jsm.2016.19.3.004
  2. 김도경(2004), "서비스기업의 혁신," 과학기술정책, 제4권, 제3호, pp. 78-87.
  3. 김수영.유왕진.이상진(2014), "IT벤처기업의 기업가정신과 동적역량 간의 관계분석을 통한 조직유효성 향상방안에 관한 연구," 한국전자거래학회지, 제19권, 제4호, pp. 110-117. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2014.19.4.101
  4. 김수영(2015), 중소벤처기업의 조직자원과 동적역량이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 건국대학교 박사학위 논문.
  5. 김시영(2012), 최고경영자의 리더십이 경영혁신과 기술혁신에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 부산대학교 박사학위 논문.
  6. 마상진(2004). 실업계 고등학교 교사의 직업교육 가치성향과 조직몰입의 관계, 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  7. 배현기.안윤지.박광호(2014), "벤처기업의 글로벌 경쟁우위 확보 전략", 한국경영공학회지, 제19권, 제3호, pp. 87-119.
  8. 송지준(2015), SPSS/AMOS 통계분석방법, 21세기사, 경기.
  9. 안봉근.주기중(2014), "중소제조업의 양수혁신전략이 기술혁신과 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구", 한국경영공학회지, 제19권, 제1호, pp. 39-55.
  10. 유태욱.양동우(2009), "기술혁신 활동, 기술적 성과, 경제적 성과 간의 관계에 관한 실증연구: 기술혁신형 중소기업을 중심으로", 기업가정신과 벤처연구(JSBI), 제12권, 제4호, pp. 69-93.
  11. 윤동주(2014), "기업의 가치지향성이 업무생산성과 경영성과에 미치는 영향 : 중소 IT기업 비IT기업의 비교연구를 중심으로", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 제15권, 제4호, pp. 1971-1982. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.4.1971
  12. 이규돈.이상진.이철규(2016), "중소 IT기업 영업사원의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 성과 창출 제고 방안 : 조직시민행동 및 경영성과 제고 방안을 중심으로", 한국전자거래학회지, 제21권, 제3호, pp. 101-128. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2016.21.3.101
  13. 이종희.서철승.이철규(2017), "의료기기 산업에서 R&D 투자가 경영성과에 미치는 영향 : 제조능력과 임상평가의 매개효과를 중심으로", 한국경영공학회지, 제22권, 제1호, pp. 89-105.
  14. 최윤식.최현식(2017), 제 4 의 물결이 온다, 지식노마드, 서울.
  15. 허준(2013), 허준의 쉽게 따라하는 AMOS 구조방정식 모형, 한나래, 서울.
  16. Barreto, I. (2010), "Dynamic capability: A review of past research and an agenda for the future," Journal of Management, Vol.36, No.1, pp. 256-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
  17. Brewer. M. B. and Chen, Y. R.(2007), "Where(Who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism," Psychological Review, Vol.114, No.1, pp. 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
  18. Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., Donavan, D. T., and Licata, J. W.(2002), "The Customer Orientation of Service Workers: Personality Trait Effects on Self and Supervisor Performance Ratings," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.39, No.1, pp. 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.110.18928
  19. Carroll, A. B.(1979), A Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance: Collage of Business Administration, University of Georgia. Working Paper.
  20. Choi, H-S. Seo, J-G, and Cho, S-J.(2013), Effects of individualistic-collectivistic value orientation and self-representation on group creativity: Unpublished manuscript.
  21. Eisenhardt, K.M. and J.A. Martin (2000), "Dynamic capabilities: What are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.10/11, pp. 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  22. Gardarino, E. Johnson, M. S.(1999), "The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol.63, No.2, pp. 70-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251946
  23. Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V.(1984), "Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.27, No.1, pp. 25-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/255955
  24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P.(2005). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business School Publishing.
  25. Kividarvi, H. and Saarinen, T.(1995), "Investment in information systems and the financial performance of the firm," Information & Management, Vol.28, No.2, pp. 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)94022-5
  26. Knight, K.(1967), "A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process", Journal of Business, Vol. 40, pp.478-496. https://doi.org/10.1086/295013
  27. Kwon, Y.C. (2013). Learning orientation, dynamic capabilities and performance in Korean high-tech ventures. Advances In Management, 6(4), 54-61.
  28. Kotler, P.(1979), "Strategies for Introducing Marketing into Nonprofit Organizations," Journal of Marketing, Vol.43, No.1, pp. 37-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250756
  29. Levitt, T.(1980), "Marketing Success Through Differentiation of Anything," Harvard Business Review, Vol.58, pp. 82-91.
  30. Marquis, D. G.(1969), The anatomy of successful innovations: Ballinger Cambridge, MA.
  31. McFarland, D. E.(1982), Management and Society: An Institutional Framework: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  32. Rifkin, J.(2014), The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism, St. Martin's Press.
  33. Schmit, M. J. and Allscheid, S. P.(1995), "Employee attitudes and customer satisfaction: Making theoretical and empirical connections," Personnel Psychology, Vol.48, No.3, pp. 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01768.x
  34. Schumpeter, J. A.(1961), The Theory of Economy Development, Harbard University Press, Cambridge.
  35. Teece, D. J.(2007), "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13, pp. 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  36. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen (1997), "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  37. Winter, S. G.(2003), "Understanding dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp. 991-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
  38. Zollo, M. and S.G. Winter (2002), "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities," Organization Science, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780