Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of SW Education Using Robot on Flow

로봇 활용 SW 교육이 초등학생의 몰입에 미치는 효과

  • Noh, Jiyae (Ewha Womans University, Dept. of Educational Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jeongmin (Ewha Womans University, Dept. of Educational Technology)
  • 노지예 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 이정민 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.21
  • Accepted : 2018.06.04
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we examine the effects of SW education using robot on flow in elementary school. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, SW education using robot was conducted to 155 students. In addition, we examined mean difference using matched pair t-test and ANCOVA. Our results show that SW education using robot significantly improved flow. Further, flow was not associated with gender. This study was investigated effects of the SW education using robot and identify differences depending on gender, and expanded the understanding of the SW education using robot.

본 연구는 초등학교 SW 교육에서 로봇의 활용이 몰입에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고, 성별의 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 경기도 A 초등학교 로봇 활용 SW 교육에 참여한 초등학생 155명을 대상으로 로봇 활용 SW 교육을 실시하고, 대응 표본 t검정, 공분산분석을 통해 평균의 차이를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 로봇 활용 SW 교육을 실시한 후 몰입이 유의하게 향상되었으나, 성별에 따른 몰입의 차이는 유의하지 않았다. 본 연구는 초등학생의 로봇 활용 SW 교육의 효과를 검증하고, 성별의 차이를 규명하여 로봇 활용 SW 교육에 대한 이해를 확장시켰다는 점에서 연구의 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K. M. & Seon, W. S. (2009). The Effects of Scratch programming on Flow. Proceeding of Korea Multimedia Society, 12(2), 704-707.
  2. Bae, S. A. (2014). Effect of Technology Contents-Based Robot Education Program on Attitude toward Technology of Elementary School Students. The Journal of Education, 34(1), 183-203.
  3. Bae. Y. K. (2007). A Study of the Robot Programming Instructional Strategies Considered Gender Differences. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 10(4). 27-37.
  4. Carter, J., & Jenkins, T. (1999). Gender and programming. SIGCSE Bull, 31(3), 1-4. doi:10.1145/384267.305824
  5. Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., Nilan, M (1997). Optimal Experience of Web Activities, Computer in Human behavior, 15(5). 586-608.
  6. Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. New York: Routledge.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  9. Han, S. K., & Ryu, M. Y. (2016). SW education for Computational Thinking. Kyeonggi, Life and Power Press.
  10. Kang, M. H., Park, J. H., Yoon, S. H., Kang, M. J., & Jang, J. E. (2016). The Mediating Effect of Learning Flow on Affective Outcomes in Software Education Using Games. Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, 20(5), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.4.475
  11. KERIS (2017). SW Education Using Robot Training by Level.
  12. Kim, J. A. (2014). Verification of a Structural Model of the Relationship between learning flow experience, Learning staying power, Academic achievement, and Academic self-efficacy. Korean journal of youth studies, 21(12), 127-152.
  13. Kim. K. H. (2016). The Effects of the Robot Based Instruction on Improving Immersion Learning. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 14(2), 1-12.
  14. Kim. Y. M., & Kim. J. H. (2015). Development and Application of Software Education Program of App Inventor Utilization for Improvement of Elementary School Girls' Computational Thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education., 19(4), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.385
  15. Lawhead, P. B., Duncan, M. E., Bland, C. G., Goldweber, M., Schep, M., Barnes, D. J., & Hollingsworth, R. G. (2002). A road map for teaching introductory programming using LEGO mindstorms robots. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2). 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1145/782941.783002
  16. Lee. E. K., & Lee. Y. J. (2007). The Effect of a Robot Programming Learning on Problem Solving Ability. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 10(6). 19-27.
  17. Lee. E. K., & Lee. Y. J. (2008a). The Effects of Scratch Based Programming Education on Middle School Students' Flow Level and Programming Achievement. The Journal of Secindary Education, 56(2), 359-382.
  18. Lee. E. K., & Lee. Y. J. (2008b). The Effects of 4CID Model based Robot Programming Learning on Learners' Flow Level. The Journal of Korean association of computer education. 11(4), 37-46.
  19. Lee, H. S., Han, J. H., & Jo, M. H. (2013). Effect Analysis of Learning with a Robot for Improving Creativity in the Regular Curriculum of Elementary School. Journal of Child Education, 22(2), 19-35.
  20. Lee, J. Y., Song, J. B., & Lee, T. W. (2009). An Effect of the Programming Learning using Robot on Attitude toward Computer Learning and Computer. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 15(3), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2009.15.3.89
  21. Ministry of education (2015). SW Education Operation Guidelines.
  22. Park, S. I. & Kim, Y. K. (2006). An Inquiry on the Relationships among Learning-Flow Factors, Flow Level, Achievement under On-line Learning Environment. The Journal of Open education, 14(1), 93-115.
  23. Park, Y. S. & Seo, H. J. (2012). The Effects Blended Robot Education Program on Learning Motivation and Immersion of Children. The Journal of Korea elementary education. 23(4), 1-20.
  24. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
  25. Seok. I, B. (2008). Analyzing Characters of the Learning Flow. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 187-212.
  26. Seok, I. B., & Kang, I. C. (2007). Development and Validation of the Learning Flow Scale. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.1.121
  27. Song. J. B., Baek. S. H., & Lee. T. W. (2009). The Effect of Robot Programming Learning Considered Gender Differences on Female Middle School Student's Flow Level and Problem Solving Ability. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 12(1). 45-55.
  28. Tzafestas, C. S., Palaiologou, N., & Alifragis, M. (2006). Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: comparative experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on education, 49(3), 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879255
  29. Van Merrienboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504993
  30. Van Merrienboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2
  31. Yoo, I. H. (2013). The Effects on Flow at Using Robots of Introductory Programming Course. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 17(3). 329-337. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2013.17.3.329

Cited by

  1. 로봇 활용 SW융합교육에서 SW효능감이 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양에 미치는 영향: 흥미와 학습참여의 이중매개효과 vol.20, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.11.001