Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconstruction of Discourse on Curriculum Reconstruction

4차 산업혁명 시대를 대비한 교육과정재구성 담론의 재구성

  • Received : 2018.03.21
  • Accepted : 2018.06.20
  • Published : 2018.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reveal the limitation of previous studies on curriculum re-construction and to suggest an alternative for curriculum re-construction. Through the literature review, this paper finds that previous studies quiet over the direction about selecting as well as organizing contents. In order to overcome the weaknesses of previous studies, this paper embraces the interest of learner for establishing the direction of curriculum reconstruction. To be more specific, this study shows that how can the ideas of growth, habit, and interest of John Dewey connect to contents-selecting and organizing in the process of instruction. As a result, this paper helps curriculum discourses to make progress for various direction and helps teachers to reconstruct the contents based on interests of their students.

본 연구는 최근 교육과정 분야에서 강조되고 있는 교사의 교육과정 재구성 담론의 한계를 지적하고 대안적 담론을 제시하는데 그 목적이 있다. 먼저 선행연구 분석을 통해 기존 교육과정 재구성 담론이 교사의 전문성 신장을 통한 교육내용 선정 및 조직이라는 큰 틀에서 진행되고 있음을 밝히고 이러한 논의가 교육내용 선정의 방향을 결정하는데 한계가 있다는 점을 지적하고 있다. 이에 대한 대안으로 본 논문은 학습자 흥미를 교육과정 재구성 담론에 포함시킴으로써 그 방향성을 설정하는데 도움을 주고 있다. 보다 구체적으로 Dewey의 성장, 습관, 흥미의 개념이 어떻게 교육과정 재구성 담론과 연계될 수 있는지를 제시함으로써 향후 교육과정 재구성 논의를 풍부하게 할 수 있도록 하고 있으며, 실제 학교 수업에서 교사가 학습자의 흥미를 바탕으로 교육내용을 어떻게 선정하고 조직해야 할지를 제안하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. L. Cuban. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classroom, 1890-1980, New York: Longman.
  2. J, Dewey. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. D. Tyack, & L. Cuban.(1995). Tinkering toward utopia. MA: Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  4. M. Apple. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education, New York: Routledge.
  5. W. Pinar. (1999). Response: Gracious submission. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 28, 14-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028001014
  6. B. M. Jung. (1954). Curriculum. Seoul: pungkukhakwon.
  7. W. H. Schubert. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan.
  8. D. Y. Kim, & O. H. Woo. (2016). Critiques of postmodernism's epistemology in curriculum discourses, The Korea Educational Review. 22(4), 23-41.
  9. http://www.nextdaily.co.kr/news/article.html?id=20171023800001 (2017,9.25)
  10. H. Kliebard. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. New York: Routledge.
  11. K. H. Seo. (2009). Teacher' Experience of reconstructing national curriculum, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 159-189. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.27.3.200909.007
  12. H. K. Kim.(2015). A semantic analysis of the curriculum jaegusung, Journal of Curriculum Integration, 29(2), 54-82.
  13. M. S. Seo.(2011). Critigue on the conceptual ambiguity of curriculum jaegusung, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.29.3.201109.004
  14. N. J. Paik. (2013). Teachers' interpretations of curriculum documents and curriculum potential, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.31.3.201309.009
  15. S. E. Lee. (2015). Curriculum reconstruction as Hermeneutic circle, The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(4), 241-265.
  16. H. C. Choi. (2015). The conceptual analysis of consilience. Material of The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence, 44-55.
  17. G. H. Park. (2012). The idea of general education. The Studies of Humanities, 43, 479-481.
  18. D. Y. Kim. (2016). The merits and demerits of convergence education. Higher Education, 193, 64-69.
  19. J. Dewey. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan company.
  20. M. F. D. Young.(2006). Education, knowledge and the role of the state, in A. Moore(ed.). Schooling, society and curriculum. London: Routledge.
  21. B. Bernstein. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
  22. J. Dewey. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan company.
  23. E. Eisner. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
  24. H. Kliebard. (1970). The Tyler rationale, The School Review, 78(2), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1086/442905
  25. J. Bruner. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.