Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Convergence Study for University Students' Perception and Satisfaction on Syllabus

수업계획서에 대한 학습자의 인식과 만족에 대한 융합적 연구

  • Park, Ok-Hee (Ju Si Gyeong Liberal Arts College, Pai Chai University)
  • 박옥희 (배재대학교 주시경교양대학)
  • Received : 2018.03.27
  • Accepted : 2018.06.20
  • Published : 2018.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aims to investigate university students' perception of syllabus and their satisfaction of its components. A survey was conducted of the whole student body in a university located in Daejeaon city. 996 students answered the questionnaire. The findings of the study are as follows: Females or upper grade students showed a more positive response to the syllabus than males or lower grade students. The group who positively perceived satisfaction of the syllabus showed less satisfaction of the syllabus components. The subjects evaluated the details or directions of the categories of Exams, Assignment, and Instructors' information were insufficient or incorrect. The pedagogical implications and suggestions for syllabus are also discussed.

본 연구는 D광역시 소재 P사립대학교의 수업계획서에 대한 학습자들의 인식과 수업계획서의 구성요소에 대한 만족도를 조사 분석하여 수업계획서의 실체를 파악하고 개선점과 시사점을 제시하기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. P대학교 재학생 996명을 대상으로 자기기입식 구조화된 설문지를 사용하였고, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 22.0프로그램으로 통계 처리하였다. 연구결과 현 수업계획서에 대한 인식에서 성별, 학년별로 유의한 상관관계를 보였는데 여학생이 남학생보다, 고학년이 저학년보다 수업계획서에 대한 긍정적인 인식이 높았다(p<.05). 수업계획서의 11개의 구성요소에 대한 만족도를 상하 각 10%선 내의 표본 집단을 추출하여 알아본 결과 유의한 상관관계를 보였다(p<.05). 상위집단은 '시험', '과제', '담당교수정보' 항목에서 만족도가 낮았고, 이 부분은 상하집단간 차이도 제일 커서 이 부분에 대한 개선이 필요하다는 것을 보여주었다. 연구결과를 토대로 수업계획서 개발에 대한 교육적 함의 및 제언이 논의되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. L. B. Nilson. (2003). Teaching at its best. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, INC.
  2. J. M. Stattery & J. F. Carlson. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practice. College Teaching, 53(4), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164
  3. K. Matejka & L. B. Kurke. (1994). Designing a great syllabus, College Teaching, 42(3), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838
  4. H. R. Jung. (2007). Un analysis of undergraduate course syllabus and development of models, Ph.D. dissertation, Yeonsei University, Seoul.
  5. J. Parkers & M. Harris. (2002). The purpose of syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595875
  6. S. Y. Jeon. (1997). University Curriculum and courses. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  7. http://media.daum.net/society/others/newsview?newsid=20070613093308335.
  8. http://view.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2010011408190079935&nvr=Y
  9. S. H. Lee. (1987). University Curriculum. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
  10. I. S. Choi, H. S. Lee, G. H. Lee & S. J. Kim. (2012). A detailed analysis of creativity courses provided by prestigious Korean universities. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.30.2.201206.007
  11. H. S. Kim & H. S. Kim. (2009). Dynamic syllabus composition system considering the priority of educational objectives. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(2), 13-22.
  12. S. Y. Kim. (1991). Strategy of the Usage and Development of the Curriculum. Higher Education, 49(1), 101-105.
  13. H. S. Chung & J. M. Kim. (2015). Design of semantic models for teaching and learning based on convergence of ontology technology. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(3), 127-134. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.3.127.
  14. S. H. Kang & E. J. Lee. (2013). A Study of Learner's Usage and Satisfaction by the Levels of Perception of the Course Syllabus: in a Graduate School of Education, Journal of educational studies, 44(1), 31-61.
  15. M. J. Oh. (2016). Study on professors' and students' perception of the specificity of syllabus. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(11), 29-46. DOI: 10.22251/JLCCI. 2016.16.11.29
  16. E. J. Ryu & J. H. Park. (2013). A study on the students' satisfaction and utilization related to the syllabus-based on the beauty related department in the 4-year university. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 19(2), 102-111.
  17. J. Y. Park, S. W. Kim, W. H. Moon, O. K. Park, G, B. Lee & I. S. Choi. (2017). Standardized syllabus development report. Daejeon: Pai Chai University Press.