DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Vertical Differentiation Strategy of a Monopolistic Company under Network Externality

망외부성이 존재하는 상품에 대한 독점 기업의 수직차별화 전략 분석

  • Cho, Hyung-Rae (Dept. of Industrial Systems Engineering/ERI, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Rhee, Minho (Dept. of Industrial Systems Engineering/ERI, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 조형래 (경상대학교 공과대학 산업시스템공학부/공학연구원) ;
  • 이민호 (경상대학교 공과대학 산업시스템공학부/공학연구원)
  • Received : 2018.03.08
  • Accepted : 2018.06.26
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The proliferation of information technologies made it possible to produce information products of different versions at much lower cost comparing to traditional physical products. Thus it is common for information product manufacturers to consider vertically differentiated product line for more profit through improved market coverage. Another salient characteristic of most information product is network externality. Existing researches dealing with vertical differentiation and network externality usually assumed oligopolistic market where vertically differentiated products are provided by competing companies, respectively. Moreover, they analyzed the essentially dynamic characteristic of network externality statically. In this study, different from the previous researches, the vertical differentiation strategy of a monopolistic company under network externality is dynamically analyzed. We used a two-period model to accommodate the dynamic feature of network externality. Based on the two-period model, the profit maximizing solutions are analyzed. The results showed that a monopolistic company has no incentive to differentiate products vertically when the network externality is absent. On the contrary, when the network externality exists, the monopolistic company can derive more profit by vertically differentiating the product line. It is also shown that, for more profit, the monopolistic company should keep the quality difference between the high quality product and the low quality product as greater as possible.

Keywords

References

  1. Baake, P. and Boom, A., Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, Vol. 19, pp. 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00029-6
  2. Chen, J., Doraszelski, U., and Harrington, J.E., Avoiding Market Dominance : Product Compatibility in Markets with Network Effects, The RAND Journal of Economics, 2009, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.455-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00073.x
  3. Cho, H.R. and Rhee, M.H., Game Theoretic Analysis of the Price and Quality Strategy of a Private Brand Product, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 41-48.
  4. Choi, J.P., Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1994, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 167-182.
  5. Conner, K.R., Obtaining Strategic Advantage from Being Imitated : When Can Encouraging "Clones" Pay?, Management Science, 1995, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.2.209
  6. Ellison, G., The neo-Luddite's Lament : Excessive Upgrades in the Software Industry, RAND Journal of Economics, 2000, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 253-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601040
  7. Farrel, J. and Saloner, G., Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1992, Vol. XL, No. 1, pp. 9-35.
  8. Griva, K. and Nikolaos, V., Price Competition in a Differentiated Products Duopoly under Network Effects, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011. Vol. 23, pp. 85-97.
  9. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility, The American Economic Review, 1985, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 424-440.
  10. Kim, J., Product Compatibility as a Signal of Quality in a Market with Network Externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 942-964.
  11. Lee, M.S. and Yang, D.W., Exploratory Study on the technology brand marketing strategy, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 2016, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 348-356. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.7.348
  12. Park, J.K., Comparative Analysis on the Compatibility and Network Externality in Monopoly and Duopoly under Vertical Differentiation, The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-30.
  13. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R., Information Rules, Harvard Business School Press, 1999.

Cited by

  1. 수직적으로 차별화된 시장 하에서 망외부성이 미치는 영향에 대한 동태적 분석 vol.42, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2019.42.2.001
  2. 망외부성이 존재하고 수직적으로 차별화된 제품 간의 호환성 전략 분석 vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2020.43.1.007
  3. 후속시장이 가격결정에 미치는 영향 분석 vol.43, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2020.43.3.021
  4. 망외부성이 수직 차별화된 시장의 가격경쟁에 미치는 영향 분석 vol.44, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2021.44.1.037