DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Packet Transceiver on 2.4GHz for Whooper Swan

  • Received : 2018.03.02
  • Accepted : 2018.04.24
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

We devised a bird-borne transceiver unit for S-band packet radio communications based on the CC2500 transceiver, a device manufactured by Texas Instruments (TI). Our assessments determined the optimal parameters needed to achieve successful bird-to-center communication over a distance of 18 km and bird-to-bird communication over a distance of 200 m. These parameters included optimal modulation methods, transmission rates, and antennas. We equipped the transceiver unit with a modified dipole antenna (collinear antenna), which we tested in a 10 m anechoic chamber. Our experimental assessments and circuit design review identified the following parameters: 2FSK modulation method; 14.28 kHz frequency shift; 101.56 kHz IF reception bandwidth; and Manchester encoding (+). Our assessments showed bird-to-bird communications could be achieved over a distance of 200 m assuming MSK, FEC (+), and 500 kbps. Following tests by an official body, we obtained 28 sets of a type approval license for 2.4 GHz. In cooperation with the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, we attempted to tag and release six or more swans. This unit gives us the ability to obtain vital data on swans. We expect this data to provide significant benefits, including clues on improving screening for infected individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. C. Stergiou, K. E. Psannis, "Efficient and Secure Big Data delivery in Cloud Computing", Springer, Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1-20, April 2017.
  2. K. Psannis, Y. Ishibashi, "Impact of Video Coding on Delay and Jitter in 3G Wireless Video Multicast Services", EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Vol. 2006, Article ID 24616, pp. 1-7, 2006.
  3. C. Stergiou, K. Psannis, "Recent advances delivered by Mobile Cloud Computing and Internet of Things for Big Data applications: a survey", Wiley, International Journal of Network Management, pp. 1-12, May 2016.
  4. A. Omorinoye, Q. Vien "On the Optimisation of Practical Wireless Indoor and Outdoor Microcells Subject to QoS Constraints", Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, no.9:pp.948-960, Sep. 2017, doi:10.3390/app7090948
  5. A. Vasiliou, A. Economides, "Mobile collaborative learning using multicast MANETs", Int. J. Mobile Communications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp.423-444, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2007.012789
  6. P. Sikka, P. Corke, et. Al., "Wireless sensor devices for animal tracking and control", Local Computer Networks, 2004. 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on, ISBN: 0-7695-2260-2, DOI: 10.1109/LCN.2004.141, Nov. 2004.
  7. J. Wilhelm, S. Blackshire,"Energy-Neutral Data Collection Rate Control for IoT Animal Behavior Monitors", Appl. Sci. 2017, 7,1169, pp.1-18, Nov. 2017. doi:10.3390/app711116.
  8. ITU-T "Green ICT solutions for telecom network facilities", Recommendation ITU-T L.1325, Dec. 2016.
  9. Green energy, "Animal power", http://www.greenenergyhelpfiles.com/animalpower.htm Mar. 2018.
  10. Microwave Telemetory Inc., "PTT-100 70 gram Argos/GPS Solar Powered PTT", http://www.microwavetelemetry.com/bird/solarArgosGPS_70g.cfm, Mar. 2018.
  11. I. Nakajima, T. Kitano, M. Katayama, L. Androuchko, "Expected Communications Technology to Track Avian Influenza and Related the Statement of Appeal by ITU-D SG2 Q14", Int. J. eHealth & Medical Communications vol.2, no.4, pp.20-37, 2010.
  12. I. Nakajima, "Telecommunications for Disaster and Pandemics" www.ituaj.jp/wpcontent/ uploads/2013/04/nb25-2_web-10_tokai.pdf
  13. "Basic Description of the Argos System", Feb. 2018; www.webpages.uidaho.edu/wlf314/labs/ArgosSystemDescription.pdf.
  14. North Star, "Tracking Birds," www.northstarst.com/tracking-birds, Mar. 2018.
  15. D. Anthony, W.Bennett, M. Vuran, M. Dwyer, S. Elbaum, A. Lacy, M. Engels, W. Wehtje,"Sensing through the continent: Towards monitoring migratory birds using cellular sensor networks", Proceedings of ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp.329-340, Apr. 2012.
  16. Z. Eu, P. Lee, H. Tan, "Classification of Packet Transmission Outcomes in Wireless Sensor Networks", Proceedings of IEEE ICC, pp.1-4, Jun. 2011. DOI: 10.1109/icc.2011.5962637
  17. I. Nakajima, T. Kitano, M. Katayama,"A study on new Ku-band digital transponder", Proceedings of IEEE e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, Oct. 2012
  18. O. Roy, J. Hart, "Transmitter for Telemetry of Biolog ical Data from Birds in Flight", IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Electronics, vol.10, no.3, pp.114-116, July 1963.
  19. H. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Zhou,"Using a Time Series of Satellite Imagery to Study the Wild Birds' Migration", IEEE Computer Society, Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing, pp.46-50, Dec. 2013.
  20. Y. Li, Y. Yin, "Bird Objects Detection and Tracking on the Wild Field Circumstance", Proceedings of EEE Computer Society WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, Mar. 2009.
  21. E. Morishita, K. Itao, K. Sasaki, H. Higuchi,"Movements of Crows in Urban Areas,Based on PHS Tracking"; www.airies.or.jp/attach.php/.../save/0/0/07_2-09.pdf, Feb. 2018.