DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Marbling Fleck Characteristics and Objective Tenderness Parameters with Different Marbling Coarseness within Longissimus thoracis Muscle of High-marbled Hanwoo Steer

  • Lee, Boin (Department of Animal Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yoon, Sungho (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation) ;
  • Lee, Younkyung (Department of Animal Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Oh, Eunmi (Department of Animal Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yun, Yun Kyung (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation) ;
  • Kim, Byoung Do (Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation) ;
  • Kuchida, Keigo (Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Hee Kyung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Jangan University) ;
  • Choe, Jeehwan (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Young Min (Department of Animal Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2018.05.17
  • Accepted : 2018.06.03
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

It is important to understand how marbling traits and tenderness differ among beef steaks from the carcass grading site and other regions within the longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle, as these characteristics are closely associated with consumer acceptability and willingness to purchase. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the marbling fleck traits and objective tenderness parameters in the groups classified by the coarseness index (CI) of marbling fleck (high and low groups) at the carcass grading site ($13^{th}$ thoracic vertebra; 13T) and three different locations (13T, 9T, and 6T) within the LT muscle from well-marbled (marbling score 7 to 9) Hanwoo steer. Image analysis showed that the longitudinal locations had a significant effect on marbling fleck traits. The total area of large marbling fleck divided by the total marbling area (coarseness) was higher at the central region (13T to 12T) compared to the front thoracic region (6T to 5T) in the high CI group (0.23 vs. 0.17, p<0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the total number of marbling fleck within the LT muscle in the high or low CI groups (p>0.05). Location effect on objective tenderness parameters within the LT muscle was somewhat limited, although the high CI group had a lower Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) value than did the low group (p<0.05). Taken together, the degree of coarseness of marbling fleck decreased from the carcass grading site to the front thoracic site, whereas the objective tenderness parameters, including WBS and hardness, of the grading site did not differ from the other regions within the LT muscle.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecht E, Teuscher F, Ender K, Wegner J. 2006. Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle bundle structure in cattle. J Anim Sci 84:2959-2964. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-345
  2. AOAC. 2012. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 19th ed. AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  3. Bourne MC. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol 32:62-66.
  4. Choi YM, Kim BC. 2009. Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest Sci 122:105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.015
  5. Choi YM, Oh HK. 2016. Carcass performance, muscle fiber, meat quality, and sensory quality characteristics of crossbred pigs with different live weights. Korean J Food Sci An 36:389-396. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.389
  6. Faucitano L, Rivest J, Daigle JP, Levesque J, Gariepy C. 2004. Distribution of intramuscular fat content and marbling within the longissimus muscle of pigs. Can J Anim Sci 84:57-61. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-064
  7. Gerrard DE, Gao X, Tan J. 1996. Beef marbling and color score determination by image processing. J Food Sci 61:145-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14745.x
  8. Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baeza E, Medale F, Jurie C, Pethick DW. 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: Development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4:309-319.
  9. Honikel KO. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 49:447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
  10. Janz JAM, Aalhus JL, Dugan MER, Price MA. 2006. A mapping method for the description of Warner-Bratzler shear force gradients in beef longissimus thoracis et lumborum and Semitendinosus. Meat Sci 72:79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.009
  11. Konarska M, Kuchida K, Tarr G, Polkinghorne RJ. 2017. Relationships between marbling measures across principal muscles. Meat Sci 123:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.005
  12. Korea Institute of Animal Products Quality Evaluation (KAPE). Available from: http://www.ekapepia.or.kr. Accessed at Feb 1, 2017.
  13. Kuchida K, Kono S, Kohishi K, Van Vleck LD, Suzuki M, Miyoshi S. 2000. Prediction of crude fat content of longissimus muscle of beef using the ratio of fat area calculated from computer image analysis: Comparison of regression equations for prediction using different input devices at different stations. J Anim Sci 78:799-803. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.784799x
  14. Kuchida K, Osawa T, Hori T, Kotaka H, Maruyama S. 2006. Evaluation and genetics of carcass cross section of beef carcass by computer image analysis. J Anim Genet 34:45-52. https://doi.org/10.5924/abgri2000.34.2_45
  15. Lee Y, Lee B, Kim HK, Yun YK, Kang SJ, Kim KT, Kim BD, Kim EJ, Choi YM. 2018. Sensory quality characteristics with different beef quality grades and surface texture features assessed by dented muscle area and firmness, and the relation to muscle fiber and bundle characteristics. Meat Sci (in press).
  16. Miller RK. 2014. Palatability. In Encyclopedia of meat science. 2nd ed. Dikeman M, Devine C (ed). pp 252-261. Elsevier, London, UK.
  17. Nakahashi Y, Murayama S, Seki S, Hidaka S, Kuchida K. 2007. Computer image analysis for marbling change within longissimus muscle with cut section of Japanese Black steers. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 78:441-446. https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.78.441
  18. Pena F, Molina A, Aviles C, Juarez M, Horcada A. 2013. Marbling in the longissimus thoracis muscle from lean cattle breeds. Computer image analysis of fresh versus stained meat samples. Meat Sci 95:512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.036
  19. Rhee MS, Wheeler TL, Shackeford SD, Koohmaraie M. 2004. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. J Anim Sci 82:534-550. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.822534x
  20. SAS. 2014. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  21. Searls GA, Maddock RJ, Wulf DM. 2005. Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck. J Anim Sci 83:2835-2842. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83122835x
  22. Williams JC, Field RA, Riley ML. 1996. Influence of storage times after cooking on Warner-Bratzler shear values of beef roasts. J Food Sci 48:309-310.
  23. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, Hughes SI, Whittington FM. 2008. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci 78:343-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019
  24. Zembayashi M, Lunt DK. 1995. Distribution of intramuscular lipid throughout M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum in Japanese Black, Japanese Shorthorn and Japanese Black crossbreds. Meat Sci 40:211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00046-A

Cited by

  1. Correlation of Marbling Characteristics with Meat Quality and Histochemical Characteristics in Longissimus Thoracis Muscle from Hanwoo Steers vol.39, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e12
  2. Correlations of Sensory Quality Characteristics with Intramuscular Fat Content and Bundle Characteristics in Bovine Longissimus Thoracis Muscle vol.39, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e15
  3. Comparison of Storage Stability, Volatile Compounds and Sensory Properties between Coarsely-and Finely-Marbled 1+ Grade Hanwoo Beef Loins vol.40, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e17