DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finding the Research Possibilities of Computer Technologies in Art Education

  • Received : 2018.06.19
  • Accepted : 2018.06.22
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to try finding the research possibilities of computer technology in art education and understand why computer technology has such a great impact on our contemporary education. The methodology of this study is based on the analysis of literature review. I have tried to find the importance articles in the journals of art education such as Studies in Art Education and Art Education published from the National Art Education Association, one of the most well-known organizations in the field of art education. To draw the purpose of this study, I found articles and categorized the information using key words such as aesthetic, feminist, gender issues, and interactivity. After analyzing, I have discussed about the research possibilities and important issues of computer technology in art education and then categorized the information found in each article into four different subheadings: 1) the visual effects of computer graphics in art education, 2) gender issues based on the computer technology, 3) interactive multimedia and social interactions among students, 4) research possibilities with computer technologies in art education. The findings are as follow. Firstly, there were many research possibilities of computer technologies in art education such as ways of criticizing the contemporary art world. Secondly, I found that computer technology has a great impact on art education because students are more eager to engage with computer technologies-based media activities and very familiar with new media either at home and school. Therefore, we, as educators, must address how the student will be systematically engaged with computer technologies in their educational environment and should determine what knowledge and skills prospective teachers bring to our teacher education programs and how and where they acquired this knowledge.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, H. J. (2018). Educational usage of Web 2.0-tool for cooperative learning, The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication. 18(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2018.18.1.9
  2. Buffington, M. (2008). What is Web 2.0 and how can it further art education. Art Education. 61(3), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2008.11652058
  3. Kenneth, V. & Ming, Y. W. (1999). Gender and Technology in Hong Kong: A Study of Pupils' Attitudes toward Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 9, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008894006039
  4. Freedman, K. (1997). Visual art / virtual art: Teaching Technology for Meaning. Art Education, 50 (4), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193647
  5. Freedman, K., & Relan, A. (1992). Computer graphics, artistic production, and social processes. Studies in Art Education, 33(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320358
  6. Jang, S. H., Nam, K. W., & Jung, Y. G. (2016). Smart building block toys using Internet of things technology, International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 4(2), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2016.4.2.34
  7. Jung, H. I. (2010). Computer graphics in art and design education: Exploring histories, characteristics, and applications, Korean Journal of Teacher Education. 26(4), 103-121.
  8. Madeja, S. S. (1993). The Age of the Electronic Images: The Effect on Art Education. Art Education, November, 9-14.
  9. Mercedes, D. (2015). The Application of Feminist Aesthetic Theory to Computer-Mediated Art. Studies in Art Education Published Online. 40(1), 66-79.
  10. Patton, R. M. & Buffington, M. (2016). Keeping up with our students: The evolution of technology and standards in art education. Arts Education Policy Review. 117(3), 156-167.
  11. Radclyffe-Thomas, N. (2008). Digital technology in art & design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(2), 158-167.
  12. Rogers, P. L. (1995). Towards a Language of Computer Art: When Paint Isn't Paint. Art Education, September, 17-22.
  13. Rysavy, D. M. & Sales, G. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. 39(2), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298155
  14. Shelly, G., Cashman, T., Gunter, R., & Gunter, G. (2002). Integrating technology in the classroom, (2nd. Ed.). Boston: Course Technology.
  15. Stankiewicz, M. A. (2004). Notions of technology and visual literacy. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2004.11650071