Ultrasonography

Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (대한초음파의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients

  • Kwon, Lyo Min (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kwanseop (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Min, Soo Kee (Department of Pathology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Soo Min (Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Ha, Hong Il (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min-Jeong (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.03.26
  • Accepted : 2017.08.25
  • Published : 2018.07.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of secondary appendicitis (SA) and to discuss the differential findings compared with primary appendicitis. Methods: In this study, we analyzed the ultrasonographic findings of 94 patients under 15 years old of age treated at our institution from May 2005 to May 2014 who had bowel inflammation and an inflamed appendix with a maximal outer diameter >6 mm that improved with nonsurgical treatment (the SA group). Ninety-nine patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis (the primary appendicitis [PA] group) from June 2013 to May 2014 and 44 patients with pathologically negative appendectomy results from May 2005 to May 2014 were also included to compare the ultrasonographic features of these conditions. A retrospective review of the ultrasonographic findings was performed by two radiologists. The clinical and laboratory findings were also reviewed. The results were statically analyzed using analysis of variance, the Pearson chi-square test, and the two-tailed Fisher exact test. Results: Compared with PA, cases of SA had a smaller diameter (9.8 mm vs. 6.6 mm, P<0.001), and were less likely to show periappendiceal fat inflammation (98% vs. 6%, P<0.001) or an appendicolith (34% vs. 11%, P<0.001). SA showed mural hyperemia on color Doppler ultrasonography as frequently as PA (P=0.887). Conclusion: The ultrasonographic features of SA included an increased diameter compared to a healthy appendix and the same level of hyperemia as in PA. However, the diameter was commonly in the equivocal range (mean diameter, 6.6 mm), and periappendiceal fat inflammation was rarely present in SA.

Keywords

References

  1. Old JL, Dusing RW, Yap W, Dirks J. Imaging for suspected appendicitis. Am Fam Physician 2005;71:71-78.
  2. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) right lower quadrant pain: suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:749-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.010
  3. Park NH, Oh HE, Park HJ, Park JY. Ultrasonography of normal and abnormal appendix in children. World J Radiol 2011;3:85-91. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v3.i4.85
  4. Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ. Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 2008;15:996-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.009
  5. Rothrock SG, Skeoch G, Rush JJ, Johnson NE. Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:45-50.
  6. Wright JE, Rowley M. Appendicectomy in childhood: pathology found. Aust N Z J Surg 1987;57:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01380.x
  7. Gough IR, Morris MI, Pertnikovs EI, Murray MR, Smith MB, Bestmann MS. Consequences of removal of a "normal" appendix. Med J Aust 1983;1:370-372.
  8. Fink AS, Kosakowski CA, Hiatt JR, Cochran AJ. Periappendicitis is a significant clinical finding. Am J Surg 1990;159:564-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80067-X
  9. Singhal V, Jadhav V. Acute appendicitis: are we over diagnosing it? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:766-769. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X209266
  10. Prieto-Nieto I, Perez-Robledo JP, Hardisson D, Rodriguez-Montes JA, Larrauri-Martinez J, Garcia-Sancho-Martin L. Crohn's disease limited to the appendix. Am J Surg 2001;182:531-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00811-X
  11. Scott IS, Sheaff M, Coumbe A, Feakins RM, Rampton DS. Appendiceal inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Histopathology 1998;33:168-173. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00477.x
  12. Nuwal P, Dixit R, Jain S, Porwal V. Isolated appendicular tuberculosis: a case report. Indain J Tuberc 2000;47:241-242.
  13. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158:355-360. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934762
  14. Trout AT, Towbin AJ, Fierke SR, Zhang B, Larson DB. Appendiceal diameter as a predictor of appendicitis in children: improved diagnosis with three diagnostic categories derived from a logistic predictive model. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2231-2238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3639-x
  15. Sim JY, Kim HJ, Yeon JW, Suh BS, Kim KH, Ha YR, et al. Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT findings of acute appendicitis: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1882-1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2769-2
  16. Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, Namgung S, Lee SJ, Lim JH. Appendicitis: usefulness of color Doppler US. Radiology 1996;201:221-225. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816547
  17. Kim BJ, Seo JW, Lee BH. Ultrasound findings of lymphoid hyperplasia of the appendix in children: differentiation from acute appendicitis. J Korean Soc Ultrasound Med 2009;28:261-269.
  18. Ramdass MJ, Young Sing Q, Milne D, Mooteeram J, Barrow S. Association between the appendix and the fecalith in adults. Can J Surg 2015;58:10-14. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.002014
  19. Carr NJ. The pathology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol 2000;4:46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1092-9134(00)90011-X
  20. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:557-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3
  21. Memon ZA, Irfan S, Fatima K, Iqbal MS, Sami W. Acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system. Asian J Surg 2013;36:144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.04.004
  22. Rabah R. Pathology of the appendix in children: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0288-x
  23. Xu Y, Jeffrey RB, DiMaio MA, Olcott EW. Lymphoid hyperplasia of the appendix: a potential pitfall in the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:189-194. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14846
  24. Svensson JF, Patkova B, Almstrom M, Naji H, Hall NJ, Eaton S, et al. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015;261:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000835
  25. Bakker OJ. Should conservative treatment of appendicitis be first line? BMJ 2012;344:e2546. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2546

Cited by

  1. Useful Ultrasound Findings of Pediatric Patients with Equivocal Results of Appendicitis: Analysis Based on a Structured Report Form vol.82, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2019.0191
  2. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics According to the Existence of Secondary Appendicitis in Pediatric Acute Enterocolitis: A Single Center Study vol.24, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2021.24.2.127