Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society (한국경영공학회지)

Korea Management Engineers Society (한국경영공학회)
권호 표지

Adoption and Re-usage Intention of 3D Printer in B2B Settings.

B2B기업에서 3D프린터 기술의 도입과 재사용 의도에 관한 고찰

  • 현효원 (한양대학교 경영대학 대학원) ;
  • 박정근 (한양대학교 경영대학) ;
  • 홍은표 (한양대학교 경영대학 대학원) ;
  • 김원 (한양대학교 경영대학 대학원)
  • Received : 2018.06.05
  • Accepted : 2018.06.30
  • Published : 2018.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined how user experience of new technology affects the likelihood of re-usage intention of 3D printers. The study was conducted on employees of B2B business with potential adoption of 3D technologies, and the subjects were able to experience and learn about the 3D printing technology in-person. The framework of this study based on the Technology Acceptance Model(TAM) by Davis (1989) with perceived risk, task-technology fit, experiential satisfaction, and reuse intention. Total of 133 participants who are working for B2B business experienced 3D printers in the lab to manufacture a mocking product and answered a structured survey after trial. The results indicated following contributions: first, the perceived easy of use of the 3D printing technology had a positive effect on the attitude towards the 3D printers, but the perceived usefulness did not have an effect. Also, the perceived risk on using a 3D printer has a negative effect. Finally, while the attitude towards a 3D printer had a positive effect on the satisfaction, it did not have an effect on the re-usage intention of 3D printer.

Keywords

References

  1. 권순동, 전달영, 김용영 (2012), "위험이 구매 의도에 미치는 영향의 재조명," Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 19(2), 233-247.
  2. 김상율, & 이철규. (2016). 브랜드 프랜차이즈 매장에서의 감각적 경험이 브랜드 태도, 경험적 가치, 그리고 소비자 행복에 미치는 영향. 한국경영공학회지, 21(3), 53-70.
  3. 김성익 (2015), "3D프린팅 기술을 활용한 디자인비즈니스 모델 개발에 관한 연구," 건국대학교 대학원, 박사학위논문
  4. 김유진 (2009), "대학생들의 라이프스타일에 따른 스포츠웨어 브랜드 특성, 만족도 및 재 구매의사," 숙명여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문, 91-93.
  5. 박형민, 염창선(2014), 웹사이트에서 고객가치, 고객만족 및 충성도의 관계에 대한 연구, 한국경영공학회지, 19(3), 15-24.
  6. 신병호 (2007), "e-Learning 에서 상호작용성이 사용의도에 미치는 영향," 경희대학교 e-비지니스 박사학위 논문.
  7. 심윤정, 서철승, & 이동명. (2017). 모바일 뱅킹 서비스 품질이 고객 만족도 및 충성도에 미치는 영향. 한국경영공학회지, 22(3), 63-81.
  8. 이병수, 김경훈, 김경환, 권혁천, 김원용 (2014), "특집마당: 3D 프린팅기술 해외 R&D 동향," 재료마당, 27(3), 13-19.
  9. 양희동, 최인영 (2001), "사회적 영향이 정보 시스템 수용에 미치는 영향-정보기술수용모형 (Technology Acceptance Model)에서," Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 11(3), 165-184.
  10. 장성희 (2016), "과업-기술 적합성이 SNS 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구," 벤처창업연구, 11(6), 61-69.
  11. 최주호 (2003), "호텔서비스 인카운터에서의 지각된 서비스품질, 고객태도, 만족, 재이용 의도간의 영향관계. 관광레저연구," 15(2), 59-77.
  12. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  13. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach," Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  14. Bauer, R. A. (1960), Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association, 389-398.
  15. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1177/009207038801600107
  16. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001), “Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model,” MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. doi:10.2307/3250921
  17. Bobbitt, L. M., and Dabholkar, P. A. (2001), “Integrating attitudinal theories to understand and predict use of technology-based self-service: the internet as an illustration,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 423-450. doi:10.1108/eum0000000006092
  18. Chang, H. H. (2010), “Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1-2), 69-89. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.010
  19. Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., and Yi, H. (2003), “Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions,” Electronic commerce research and applications, 2(3), 203-215. doi:10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00024-3
  20. Crespo, A. H., del Bosque, I. R., and de los Salmones Sanchez, M. G. (2009), “The influence of perceived risk on Internet shopping behavior: a multidimensional perspective,” Journal of Risk Research, 12(2), 259-277. doi:10.1080/13669870802497744
  21. Cronin Jr, J. J., and Taylor, S. A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension,” The journal of marketing, 56(3), 55-68. doi:10.2307/1252296
  22. Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
  23. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1992), “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1,” Journal of a pplied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  24. Dholakia, U. M. (2001), “A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception,” European Journal of marketing, 35(11/12), 1340-1362. doi:10.1108/eum0000000006479
  25. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991), “Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations,” Journal of marketing research, 307-319. doi:10.2307/3172866
  26. Dowling, G. R., and Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of consumer research, 21(1), 119-134. doi:10.1086/209386
  27. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  28. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  29. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. (2003), “Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model,” MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. doi:10.2307/30036519
  30. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. (1995), “Task-technology fit and individual performance,” MIS quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. doi:10.2307/249689
  31. Holden, R. J., and Karsh, B. T. (2010), “The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care,” Journal of biomedical informatics, 43(1), 159-172. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
  32. Jacoby, J., and Kaplan, L. B. (1972), "The components of perceived risk,” Pp. 382-393 in M. Venkatesan(Ed), Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference. Iowa City Iowa: Association for Consumer Research
  33. Kamarulzaman, Y. (2007), "Adoption of travele-shopping in the UK," International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(9), 703-719. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
  34. Larsen, T. J., Sorebo, A. M., & Sorebo, O. (20049). The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use. Computers in Human behavior, 25(3), 778-784. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.006
  35. Lewis, J. R. (1995), "IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use,” International Journal of Human‐Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57-78. doi:10.1080/10447319509526110
  36. Newman, J. W., and Werbel, R. A. (1973), “Multivariate analysis of brand loyalty for major household appliances,” Journal of marketing research, 10(November), 10(4), 404-409. doi:10.2307/3149388
  37. Oliver, R. L. (1980), “A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions,” Journal of marketing research, 17(November), 17(4), 460-469. doi:10.2307/3150499
  38. Peter, J. P., and Ryan, M. J. (1976), An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level, Journal of marketing research, 13(2), 184-188. doi:10.2307/3150856
  39. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., and Welker, R. B. (2002), “Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis,” Information systems research, 13(1), 50-69. doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  40. Read, W., Robertson, N., and McQuilken, L. (2011), “A novel romance: the technology acceptance model with emotional attachment,” Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(4), 223-229. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.07.004
  41. Ross, I. (1975), "Perceived risk and consumer behavior: a critical review,"in Advances in consumer Research, Vol. 2, ed. Mary Jane Schlinger, Urbana, IL: Association for Consumer Research, 1-19.
  42. Siamagka, N. T., Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N., and Valvi, A. (2015), “Determinants of social media adoption by B2B organizations,” Industrial Marketing Management, 51, 89-99. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.005
  43. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995), “Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models,” Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  44. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies,”Management science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  45. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., and Ackerman, P. L. (2000), “A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology a doption decision-making processes,” Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 83(1), 33-60. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896
  46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540
  47. Yen, D. C., Wu, C. S., Cheng, F. F., and Huang, Y. W. (2010), “Determinants of users' intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM,”Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 906-915. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005
  48. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,” The Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22. doi:10.2307/1251446
  49. EY's Global (2016), EY reports: Why 3D Printing needs to be on the business executive agenda now. https://www.ey.com/GL/en/SearchResults?SRT_F=&SRT_O=&ACT=&Page=&CF=&LF=&FILTER=&DF=&IF=&SF=&FF=&query=3D+print&search_options=country_name
  50. IDC Corporate USA (2017), IDC FutureScape: Worldwide 3D Printing 2018 Predictions. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=US43408617