The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the machining accuracy of dental digital method focusing on dental inlay

  • Bae, Eun-Jeong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Jeong, Il-Do (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2018.01.18
  • Accepted : 2018.06.14
  • Published : 2018.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the cutting method and the lamination method to investigate whether the CAD data of the proposed inlay shape are machined correctly. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The Mesial-Occlusal shape of the inlay was modeled by changing the stereolithography (STL). Each group used SLS (metal powder) or SLA (photocurable resin) in the additive method, and wax or zirconia in the subtractive method (n=10 per group, total n=40). Three-dimensional (3D) analysis program (Geomagic Control X inspection software; 3D systems) was used for the alignment and analysis. The root mean square (RMS) in the 2D plane state was measured within $50{\mu}m$ radius of eight comparison measuring points (CMP). Differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey's test were used (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. There was a significant difference in RMS only in SLA and SLS of 2D section (P<.05). In CMP mean, CMP 4 ($-5.3{\pm}46.7{\mu}m$) had a value closest to 0, while CMP 6 ($20.1{\pm}42.4{\mu}m$) and CMP 1 ($-89.2{\pm}61.4{\mu}m$) had the greatest positive value and the greatest negative value, respectively. CONCLUSION. Since the errors obtained from the study do not exceed the clinically acceptable values, the lamination method and the cutting method can be used clinically.

Keywords

References

  1. ISO/ASTM F2915:2013 Standard specification for additive manufacturing file format (AMF) Version 1.1. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/F2915.htm
  2. ASTM Additive Manufacturing File Format (AMF) Available from: http://amf.wikispaces.com/, 2017-07-25.
  3. Wimpenny DI, Pandey PM, Kumar LJ (eds). Advances in 3D printing & additive manufacturing technologies. Springer Singapore. 2017.
  4. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56:97-106.
  5. Traini T, Mangano C, Sammons RL, Mangano F, Macchi A, Piattelli A. Direct laser metal sintering as a new approach to fabrication of an isoelastic functionally graded material for manufacture of porous titanium dental implants. Dent Mater 2008;24:1525-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.029
  6. Venkatesh KV, Nandini VV. Direct metal laser sintering: a digitised metal casting technology. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:389-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0256-8
  7. Atieh MA, Ritter AV, Ko CC, Duqum I. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:400-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.022
  8. Sykes LM, Parrott AM, Owen CP, Snaddon DR. Applications of rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthetics. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:454-9.
  9. Currier JH. A computerized geometric analysis of human dental arch form. Am J Orthod 1969;56:164-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90232-2
  10. Marghalani TY. Frequency of undercuts and favorable path of insertion in abutments prepared for fixed dental prostheses by preclinical dental students. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:564-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.014
  11. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219:521-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
  12. Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.013
  13. Castillo-de-Oyague R, Sanchez-Turrion A, Lopez-Lozano JF, Albaladejo A, Torres-Lagares D, Montero J, Suarez-Garcia MJ. Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implantsupported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e610-7.
  14. Abou Tara M, Eschbach S, Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with laser-sintering technology. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:46-8.
  15. Bae EJ, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY. Bond and fracture strength of metal-ceramic restorations formed by selective laser sintering. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:266-71. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.266
  16. Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dent Mater 2013;29:e91-6.
  17. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  18. Xin XZ, Chen J, Xiang N, Wei B. Surface properties and corrosion behavior of Co-Cr alloy fabricated with selective laser melting technique. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;67:983-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9593-9
  19. He HY, Zhang JY, Mi X, Hu Y, Gu XY. Rapid prototyping for tissue-engineered bone scaffold by 3D printing and biocompatibility study. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:11777-85.
  20. ISO. 12836:2015 Dentistry - Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy. International Organization for Standardization; Geneva; Switzerland, 2012.
  21. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
  22. Brodkin D, Panzera C, Panzera P. U.S. Patent No. 6,322,728. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2001.
  23. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012
  24. Bae EJ, Jeong ID, Kim WC, Kim JH. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.004
  25. McMains S. Layered manufacturing technologies. Commun ACM 2005;48:50-6.
  26. Mandal N, Doloi B, Mondal B. Development of flank wear prediction model of Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) cutting tool using response surface methodology. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 2011;29:273-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.12.001
  27. Gu D, Shen Y. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Materials & Design 2009;30:2903-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.013
  28. Li R, Liu J, Shi Y, Wang L, Jiang W. Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012;59:1025-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3566-1
  29. Abou Tara M, Eschbach S, Wolfart S, Kern M. Zirconia ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses - first clinical results with a new design. J Dent 2011;39:208-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.12.005
  30. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:319-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00622.x
  31. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  32. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
  33. Stoll R, Fischer C, Springer M, Stachniss V. Marginal adaptation of partial crowns cast in pure titanium and in a gold alloy - an in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00801.x

Cited by

  1. 복합레진으로 제작한 인레이 보철물 구조에 따른 교합면 부위의 2차원 변연 적합도 및 내면 부위의 3차원 정확성 분석 vol.41, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.1.21
  2. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing vol.126, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.028