Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Issue Difference of Ecosystem Service Demand and Supply through Text Mining Analysis: Case Study of Shiheung using Complaints and Urban Planning Materials

텍스트 마이닝 분석을 통한 생태계서비스 수요-공급의 이슈 차이분석 - 시흥시 민원과 도시계획 자료를 활용하여 -

  • Lee, Jae-hyuck (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Park, Hong-jun (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Il-kwon (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuk-soo (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 이재혁 (국립생태원 융합연구실) ;
  • 박홍준 (국립생태원 융합연구실) ;
  • 김일권 (국립생태원 융합연구실) ;
  • 권혁수 (국립생태원 융합연구실)
  • Received : 2018.07.13
  • Accepted : 2018.08.09
  • Published : 2018.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The comparison of demand and supply is needed for efficient ecosystem services planning. However, the gap between them cannot be analyzed as existing studies mainly dealt with only the supply of ecosystem services. This study compares the demand and supply of ecosystem services in Shiheung using environmental complaints and urban planning by semantic network analysis. As a result, 'air' and 'water' quality are magnified in demand, 'energy' and 'water' are crucial in supply. This result presents that citizen ask for the improvement of air quality in regulation services, although local government has plans for energy support in provisioning services. Periodic ecosystem services demand and supply monitoring will be the base of effective ecosystem services planning, which reduce insufficiency and surplus.

Keywords

References

  1. Barral MP & Oscar MN. 2012. Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 154: 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.010
  2. Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, & Turner K. 2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics. 48(2): 177-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x
  3. Boyd J & Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological economics. 63(2-3): 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
  4. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, & Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators. 21: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  5. Chen X, Lupi F, He G, Ouyang Z, & Liu J. 2009. Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service program. Biological conservation. 142(8): 1740-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.012
  6. Cho SE & Park HW. 2012. Government organizations’ innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Scientometrics. 90(1): 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0519-2
  7. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, Van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global environmental change. 26: 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  8. Coussement K & Van den Poel D. 2008. Improving customer complaint management by automatic email classification using linguistic style features as predictors. Decision Support Systems. 44(4): 870-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.010
  9. Doerfel ML & Barnett GA. 1999. A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human communication research. 25(4): 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00463.x
  10. Engel S, Pagiola S & Wunder S. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological economics. 65(4): 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
  11. Farber SC, Costanza R & Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological economics. 41(3): 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
  12. Fisher B & Turner RK. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological conservation. 141(5): 1167-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
  13. Fisher B, Turner RK & Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological economics. 68(3): 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
  14. Fornell C & Wernerfelt B. 1987. Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing research. 337-346.
  15. Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H, & Jonsson PR. 2008. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology. 89(5): 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-2091.1
  16. Gross-Camp ND, Martin A, McGuire S, Kebede B, & Munyarukaza J. 2012. Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness. Oryx. 46(1): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605311001372
  17. Hsu C, Park SJ, & Park HW. 2013. Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong city in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia. 12(1): 65-79. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2013.12.1.065
  18. Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, & Fohrer N. 2012. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land use policy. 29(3): 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
  19. Li SY, Xie SB, Zhou YH, Wu WL & Duan Y. 2012. Discussion on the Water Supply Engineering Planning of Small Towns in Southern China. Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials.
  20. Liu SJ, & Xu H. 2012. Study on Water Supply and Drainage Facility Planning in Historic Towns-Case Study of Master Plan of Hengdaohezi Town. Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials.
  21. MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. A report of the Millenium Ecosystem Assesment: Island Press whashington.
  22. Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, & Landers DH. 2012. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological economics. 77: 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001
  23. National Institute of Ecology. 2017. Ecosystem Service Assessment with Local Resident : Case of Shiheung. National Institute of Ecology: Seocheon.
  24. National Nature Trust [cited 2018 Jun 15]. Available from: http://trust.or.kr/cooper2
  25. Nedkov S & Burkhard B. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services - Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators. 21: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
  26. Redford KH & Adams WM. 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation biology. 23(4): 785-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x
  27. Sahle M, Saito O, Fürst C & Yeshitela K. 2018. Quantification and mapping of the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service in woody biomass and soil to mitigate climate change in the socio-ecological environment. Science of The Total Environment. 624: 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.033
  28. Schnegg M & Bernard HR. 1996. Words as actors: A method for doing semantic network analysis. CAM Journal. 8(2): 7-10.
  29. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S & Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of applied Ecology. 48(3): 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
  30. Sommerville M, Jones JP, Rahajaharison M & Milner-Gulland E. 2010. The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar. Ecological economics. 69(6): 1262-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.005
  31. Tax SS, Brown SW & Chandrashekaran M. 1998. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. The journal of marketing. 60-76.
  32. Yoshimura N & Hiura T. 2017. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosystem Services. 24: 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009

Cited by

  1. Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea vol.12, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040497