Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Theoretical Exploration of a Process-centered Assessment Model for STEAM Competency Based on Learning Progressions

학습발달과정에 근거한 과정중심 STEAM 역량 평가 모델에 대한 이론적 탐색

  • Received : 2018.06.14
  • Accepted : 2018.08.08
  • Published : 2018.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The goal of this research is to suggest a theoretical process-centered assessment model based on Learning Progressions of key competencies in the context of STEAM instructions. The "Process-Products Combined Module-type (P2CM) STEAM Assessment Model (P2CM STEAM Assessment Model, hereafter) can be used both as an instructional model and as an assesment model, applicable for various STEAM topics and instructional types. consists of 3 axes. The first X axis stands for 4C competencies that should be emphasized through STEAM instruction. The second Y axis stands for the types and the hierarchy of STEAM instructions. The third Z axis stands for the assessment standards based on LP. We also exemplified an assessment module combined creativity competency with creativity-based instruction based on . Based on the research results, we suggested elaboration of assessment models based on Korean LP research outcomes, development and supply of formative assessment models through field-based in-depth research, modification of formative assessment models with the participation of teacher communities and in-service teachers, and the necessity of further research on assessment models for tracking LP.

본 연구에서는 과정중심 평가에 대한 이론적 모델을 STEAM 교육 맥락에서 핵심역량의 학습발달과정에 근거하여 개발, 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 제안하는 '과정-결과를 결합한 모듈 타입(Process-Products Combined Module-type)의 STEAM 평가모델(P2CM STEAM 평가모델)'은 문헌분석을 통해 도출된 것으로, STEAM 수업 맥락에서 핵심역량 학습발달과정에 초점을 둔 모델이다. 의 특징은 STEAM 수업과 평가를 연계하고, 과정평가와 결과평가가 동시에 가능하며, 다양한 STEAM 주제와 수업유형에 실제로 적용 가능한 점이다. 은 3개의 축으로 구성되는데, 첫 번째 축(X축)은 STEAM에서 중점을 두어야 할 4C 역량을, 두 번째 축(Y축)은 STEAM 수업유형의 종류와 위계를 나타내며, 세 번째 축은 학습발달 수준인 평가기준을 나타낸다. 에 기반으로 하여 창조기반의 창의역량에 초점을 둔 평가모듈(창의역량${\times}$창조기반)에서, 학생들의 학습발달과정을 평가할 수 있는 평가기준을 예시하였다. 연구결과를 토대로 한국형 LP에 대한 연구성과를 토대로 평가모델 개발하기, 현장밀착형 심층연구를 통한 증거기반 평가모델 개발 제공, 교사공동체 및 현장교사들의 참여를 통한 형성 평가 모델 수정보완, 학습발달수준 추적을 위한 평가모델에 대한 지속적인 연구의 필요성 등을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Lee, J., Chung, J., Choi, Y., Han, H., & Choi, J. (2012). Basic research on establishing STEAM implementation direction. Seoul: KOFAC.
  2. Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Park, J, Y., Lee, J., & Han, H. (2011). STEAM education in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  3. Choi, J. H. (2011). STEAM education based on convergence. Summer conference of the Korean Society for School Science. 8.
  4. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F.A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform (Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  5. Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 606-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20316
  6. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
  7. Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. New York, NY: Springer.
  8. Griffis, K., Wise, J., Sandoval, W. A, Borgman, C. L, Buschang, R., Cook, M., et al. (2007). CENS Pre-college Activities: 7 - 12 & CENSEI. UCLA: Center for Embedded Network Sensing. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/91337668
  9. Ha, J. H., Lee, B. I., & Ryu, H. S. (2011). Study on the creativity of an individual and a group level, and the effects of rewards in a group level. Korean Society for Creativity Education, 11(1), 89-107.
  10. Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37-56). New York, NY: Springer.
  11. Hong, O. (2016). STEAM education in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  12. Jeon, S., Kwak, Y., Koh, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., & Choi, S. (2017). The needs analysis on science literacy required for Koreans in the future society. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.441
  13. Korea Educational Development Institute [KEDI]. (2012). Development of measurement tool for creativity. Seoul: Author.
  14. Kim J., & Ando, K. (2013). Possibilities and prospects of STEAM education based on the convergence of science and art: Principles of STEAM education in Korea and designing its practices. Art Education Research Review, 27(1), 123-152.
  15. Kim, H., Kang, N. H., Kim, M., Maeng, S., Park, J., Baek, Y., Shon, J., Sim, K., Oh, P., Lee, K., Lee, B., Jeong, E., & Han, I. S. (2017). Basic research on the development of Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  16. Kim, M., Choi, S., Cha, S., Cho, S., & Ha, Y. (2012). Research on the development of assessment index and tools for creativity competency. Seoul: KEDI.
  17. Kim, S., Chung, Y., Woo, A., & Lee, H. (2012). Suggestion for theoretical model for STEAM education, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.388
  18. Kim, Y. J., Ko, S., Min, J., Lee, Y., Han, H. (2018). Development of evaluation model for STEAM (report AD18030006). Seoul: KOFAC.
  19. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC]. (2016). 2030 future society talents and core science capabilities milestone study: Seoul: Author.
  20. Lee, K. W. (2015). Core concepts and key competencies of 2015 revised curriculum. Conference of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 11-29.
  21. Maeng, S., Lee, K., Park, Y. S., Lee, J. A., & Oh, H. (2014). Development and validation of a learning progression for astronomical systems using ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0703
  22. Mclelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
  23. Mislevy, R. J., Haertel, G., Riconscente, M., Rutstein, D.vW., & Ziker, C. (2017). Evidence-centered assessment design assessing model-based reasoning using evidence-centered design (pp. 19-24). New York, NY: Springer.
  24. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015) 2015 revised information curriculum. Sejong: Author.
  25. National Assessment Governing Board (2008). NAEP 2009 science framework development: Issues and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.nagb.org
  26. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary: Paris, France: Author.
  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016). Pisa 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy: Paris, France: Author.
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2017). PISA2015 Collaborative Problem Solving. Paris, France: Author.
  30. Park, H., Baek, Y., Sim, J., Son, Y., Han, H., Beon, S., Seo, Y., & Kim, E. (2014). Basic research on raising STEAM program effectiveness and improving practical use. Seoul: KOFAC.
  31. Park, J., & Lee, J.. (2013). A systematic meta - literature analysis of empirical study on the combined education. Asia Education Research, 14(1), 97-135.
  32. Park, K. M. (2014). Development of key competency factors for measuring study outcomes in STEAM. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 14(2), 234-257.
  33. Park, S. B. & Park, B. K. (2007). Development and validation of creative disposition, environment, and process scale (C-DEPs). The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(4), 905-922.
  34. Pellegrino, J. W. (2002). Knowing what students know. Issues in science and technology, 19(2), 48-52.
  35. Pellegrino, J. W. (2013). Proficiency in science: Assessment challenges and opportunities. Science, 340(6130), 320-323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232065
  36. Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Highlights from the OECD project definition and selection competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations (DeSeCo).
  37. Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891
  38. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2),335-351 https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1338a
  39. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist: Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2012). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

  1. STEAM 교육의 한계와 개선방향 -STEAM 교육 전문성을 가진 교사의 견해를 바탕으로- vol.39, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.573
  2. 과학적 논의 과정을 시각화한 과정중심평가에서의 과학적 개념 이해 발달 vol.39, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.637