DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of EQ-5D and OHIP-14 sub-dimensions for measuring oral health-related quality of life

구강건강 관련 삶의 질 측정에서 EQ-5D 및 OHIP-14의 관련성

  • Ahn, Eunsuk (Department of Social and Humanity in Dentistry, WonKwang University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Shin, Hosung (Department of Social and Humanity in Dentistry, WonKwang University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2018.05.09
  • Accepted : 2018.08.17
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: Oral-specific measures are often preferred for examining oral disease outcomes; however, generic measures can add additional important information. This study measured oral health-related quality of life, reflecting the multidimensional characteristics of oral health, and we compared sub-dimensions of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14) with the EuroQual-5D (EQ-5D). Methods: Data from 305 patients were collected from patients who visited the dental university hospital in 2016-2017 and included EQ-5D, OHIP-14, and self-rated general/oral health questionnaires. A factor analysis was performed to identify sub-dimensions of the EQ-5D and OHIP-14, and a cluster analysis was conducted to examine the degree of overlap among the sub-dimensions of two measures. Results: In the factor analysis, a range of OHIP-14 items (physical pain, physical disability, and handicap) loaded on factor 3, along with EQ-5D items. In the analysis of groups with relatively low oral qualities of life, moving from the bottom towards the top of the dendrogram, the next major branch split was the dimension of EQ-5D pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression items, which clustered between the OHIP-14 interrupted meal and difficult relaxing subscales. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that using the EQ-5D for oral health status expends the complementary role of oral health-related quality of life measures.

Keywords

References

  1. Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Mapping oral health related quality of life to generic health state values. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:96. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-96
  2. Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Dimensions of oral health related quality of life measured by EQ-5D+ and OHIP-14. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:35. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-35
  3. Dolan P. Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States. Med Care 1997;35:1095-1108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002
  4. Eker L, Tuzun EH, Daskapan A, Bastug ZO, Yakut Y. The relationship between EQ-5D and SF-36 instruments in patients with low back pain. Fiz Rehabil 2007;18:3-10.
  5. Seong SS, Choi CB, Sung YK, Park YW, Lee HS, Uhm WS, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life using EQ-5D in Koreans. J Rheum Dis 2004;11:254-262.
  6. Oh H. Important significant factors of health-related quality of life(EQ-5D) by age group in Korea based on KNHANES(2014). J korean data Inf Sci Soc 2017;28:573-584.
  7. Park H, Kim S, Bae S. Current Status of Health-related Quality of Life Research in Korea. J Rheum Dis 2002;9:s1-s17.
  8. Jo M. The Utility Estimation of EQ-5D-5L Health States. Ulsan; 2011:1-23
  9. Brazier J, Akehurst R, Brennan A, et al. Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2005;4:201-208. doi:10.2165/00148365-200504040-00002
  10. Slade G, Spencer A. Development and evaluation of oral health impact profile. Community Dent Heal 1994;11:3-11.
  11. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-290. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
  12. Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:161-168. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00029.x
  13. Kang H. A Guide on the Use of Factor Analysis in the Assessment of Construct Validity. J Korean Ac ad Nurs 2013;43:587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  14. Lee E. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Quality of Life Scale for Korean Patients with Cancer (C-QOL). J Korean A cad Nurs 2007;37:324-333. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2007.37.3.324
  15. Shin H, Ahn E. Measurement of oral health related with quality of life using EQ-5D and OHIP-14. J Korean Acad Oral Health 2018;42:27-33. https://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2018.42.2.27
  16. Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life. Qual life Res 1997;6:139-150. doi:10.1023/A:1026490117121
  17. Choi J, Seo D. Decision trees and its application. J Korean Off Stat 1999;4:61-83.
  18. Kwak M, Rhee S. Finding factors on employment by adult life cycle using decision tree model. J Korean Data Inf Sci Soc 2016;27:1537-1545.
  19. Sharma S, Kumar A. Cluster analysis and factor analysis. In: The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances. 2006:365-393.
  20. Yong AG, Pearce S. A Beginner's Guide to Factor Analysis : Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis.TQMP 2013;9:79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
  21. Fayers PM, Hand DJ, Bjordal K, Groenvold M. Causal indicators in quality of life research. Qual life Res 1997;6:393-406. doi:10.1023/A:1018491512095
  22. Reedy J, Wirfalt E, Flood A, et al. Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods-cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysiswith colorectal cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:479-487. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp393

Cited by

  1. 한국 노인의 연령계층별 구강 및 전신 건강관련 특성과 건강관련 삶의 질(EQ-5D)과의 관계 : 국민건강영양조사 제6기 자료를 이용하여 vol.19, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190060