Journal of Breast Cancer

Korean Breast Cancer Society (한국유방암학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Breast-Conserving Surgery Alone: A Meta-Analysis

  • Chen, Jun-Ying (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center) ;
  • Huang, Yi-Jie (Department of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Zhang, Liu-Lu (Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Yang, Ci-Qiu (Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Wang, Kun (Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2017.11.17
  • Accepted : 2018.07.11
  • Published : 2018.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The use of oncoplastic reconstruction for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) extends benefits beyond merely minimizing poor cosmetic results. However, the feasibility and oncological safety of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) are controversial. Methods: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term oncological outcomes of BCS alone and BCS plus OPS. Relevant studies published before July 2017 in the Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened and collected. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (Stata Corp.). Results: A total of 3,789 patients from 11 studies were included, with 2,691 patients in the BCS-alone group and 1,098 patients in the BCS plus OPS group. The demographics were similar between both groups, and no significant difference was observed in pathological T and N stages between the two groups. Re-excision was less common (relative risk [RR], 0.66; p=0.009) and the positive-margin rate was lower, but not significantly (RR, 0.83; p=0.191), in the BCS plus OPS group than in the BCS-alone group. The local and distal recurrence rates were similar in both groups. Both disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.49; p=0.112) and overall survival (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.69; p=0.527) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion: A combination of BCS and OPS is preferred over BCS alone for decreasing re-excisions and provides similar long-term survival as BCS alone in patients with breast cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-41.
  2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227-32.
  3. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:471-81.
  4. Clough KB, Benyahi D, Nos C, Charles C, Sarfati I. Oncoplastic surgery: pushing the limits of breast-conserving surgery. Breast J 2015;21:140-6.
  5. Wanis ML, Wong JA, Rodriguez S, Wong JM, Jabo B, Ashok A, et al. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Am Surg 2013;79:1119-22.
  6. Biglia N, Ponzone R, Bounous VE, Mariani LL, Maggiorotto F, Benevelli C, et al. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. Breast 2014;23:870-5.
  7. Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, Kim D, Hwang Y, Sun Y, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 2012;15:412-9.
  8. Swanson GP, Rynearson K, Symmonds R. Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence. Am J Clin Oncol 2002;25:438-41.
  9. Macmillan RD, McCulley SJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: what, when and for whom? Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2016;8:112-7.
  10. Chakravorty A, Shrestha AK, Sanmugalingam N, Rapisarda F, Roche N, Querci Della Rovere G, et al. How safe is oncoplastic breast conservation? Comparative analysis with standard breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:395-8.
  11. De Lorenzi F, Hubner G, Rotmensz N, Bagnardi V, Loschi P, Maisonneuve P, et al. Oncological results of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution: a matchedcohort analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:71-7.
  12. Cali Cassi L, Vanni G, Petrella G, Orsaria P, Pistolese C, Lo Russo G, et al. Comparative study of oncoplastic versus non-oncoplastic breast conserving surgery in a group of 211 breast cancer patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016;20:2950-4.
  13. Mansell J, Weiler-Mithoff E, Stallard S, Doughty JC, Mallon E, Romics L. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy. Breast 2017;32:179-85.
  14. Vieira RA, Carrara GF, Scapulatempo Neto C, Morini MA, Brentani MM, Folgueira MA. The role of oncoplastic breast conserving treatment for locally advanced breast tumors: a matching case-control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2016;10:61-8.
  15. Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Yuksel M, Camlibel M, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Comparison of outcomes of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. J Breast Cancer 2013;16:193-7.
  16. Chauhan A, Sharma MM. Evaluation of surgical outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery in early breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery. Med J Armed Forces India 2016;72:12-8.
  17. Giacalone PL, Roger P, Dubon O, El Gareh N, Rihaoui S, Taourel P, et al. Comparative study of the accuracy of breast resection in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:605-14.
  18. Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M, Maffini F, Luini A, Gatti G, et al. Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:539-45.
  19. Tenofsky PL, Dowell P, Topalovski T, Helmer SD. Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 2014;207:398-402.
  20. Mazouni C, Naveau A, Kane A, Dunant A, Garbay JR, Leymarie N, et al. The role of oncoplastic breast surgery in the management of breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy. Breast 2013;22:1189-93.
  21. Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK, Kim WW, Hwang SO, Jung JH, et al. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (part 1): volume displacement. J Breast Cancer 2012;15:1-6.
  22. Franceschini G, Terribile D, Magno S, Fabbri C, Accetta C, Di Leone A, et al. Update on oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012;16:1530-40.
  23. Schwartz T, Degnim AC, Landercasper J. Should re-excision lumpectomy rates be a quality measure in breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:3180-3.
  24. Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery (SM) database. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3185-91.
  25. Savalia NB, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic breast reconstruction: patient selection and surgical techniques. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:875-82.
  26. Stankov A, Bargallo-Rocha JE, Silvio AN, Ramirez MT, Stankova-Ninova K, Meneses-Garcia A. Prognostic factors and recurrence in breast cancer: experience at the national cancer institute of Mexico. ISRN Oncol 2012;2012:825258.
  27. Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI. Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9:R6.
  28. Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A'Hern R, Bartlett J, Coombes RC, Cuzick J, et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1656-64.
  29. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-92.
  30. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg 2014;72:145-9.

Cited by

  1. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Training Surgeons and Bridging the Gap vol.11, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-019-00317-3
  2. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer vol.180, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05544-2
  3. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients vol.220, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019
  4. Oncological safety and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery among Asian women: A single institutional review vol.26, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14060
  5. Oncoplastic Surgery in Breast-Conserving Treatment: Patient Profile and Impact on Quality of Life vol.16, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1159/000507240
  6. Breast-conserving treatment in oncoplastic times: indications, cosmesis, and quality of life vol.31, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.29289/2594539420200040
  7. Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis vol.24, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e52
  8. The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08704-2
  9. A comprehensive literature review of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) among common breast reconstruction options: What types of breast reconstruction score well? vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14186
  10. Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast conserving surgery - a prospective follow-up study of subjective loco-regional late morbidity vol.60, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2021.1900907
  11. Prediction of Local Recurrence After Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Analysis of a Large Cohort vol.268, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.07.001