References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But... Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016720417219
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012a). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012b). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629013
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012c). Nature of science in science education: toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Springer international handbooks of education: vol. 24. Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1041-1060). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226
-
Acevedo-Diaz, J. A., & Garcia-Carmona, A. (2016). <
>. Tendencias sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en la educacion cientifica. Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgacion de las Ciencias, 13(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i1.02 - Ackerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2008). Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice teachers' views of the nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174702
- Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: 'Views on Science-Technology-Society'(VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503
- Allchin, D. (1997). Rekindling phlogiston: From classroom case study to interdisciplinary relationships. Science & Education, 6(5), 473-509. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008640314559
- Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
- Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science. Perspectives and resources. St. Paul, MN: SHiPS Education Press.
- Allchin, D. (2017). Beyond the consensus view: Whole science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271921
- Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bazzul, J. (2017). From Orthodoxy to Plurality in the Nature of Science (NOS) and Science Education: A Metacommentary. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271926
- Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Publishing.
- Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms. Science Teacher, 78(9), 34-40.
- Carter, L. (2008). Globalization and science education: The implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20189
- Chang, Y., Chang, C., & Tseng, Y. (2010). Trends of science education research: an automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
- Cheong, Y. W. (2014). Law, Theory, and Principle: Confusion in the Normative Meaning and Actual Usage. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.5.0459
- Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching the Nature of Science to Secondary and Post-Secondary Students: Questions Rather Than Tenets, The Pantaneto Forum, Issue 25, January. Republished (2008) in the California Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 31-40.
- Clough, M. P. (2011). Teaching and assessing the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 78(6), 56-60.
- Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2014). Laws and explanations in biology and chemistry: Philosophical perspectives and educational implications. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1203-1233). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science: Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1 & 2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8
- Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2017). Abandoning patchwork approaches to nature of science in science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 17(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271923
- DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Deng, F., Chen, D. T., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Students' views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961-999. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20460
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People's Images of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Duschl, R. A. (1994). Research on the history and philosophy of science. In D. L. Gabriel (Ed.) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Volume II), (pp. 443-465). New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2011). Demarcation in science education: Toward an enhanced view of scientific method. In S. R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Controversy, (pp. 3-19). New York: Routledge.
- Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22, 2109-2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
- Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The Nature of Science: A Perspective from the Philosophy of Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1):107-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<107::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-3
- Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1023
- Ennis, R. H. (1969). Logic in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond Nature of Science: The Case for Reconceptualising" Science" for Science Education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93-111.
- Erduran, S. (2016). Visualising the nature of science: beyond textual pieces to holistic images in science education. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselka, J. Lavonen, & A. Uitto (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014a). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014b). Regaining focus in Irish junior cycle science: Potential new directions for curriculum development on nature of science. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2014.984386
- Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Recent developments and future directions. Dordrech: Springer.
- Erduran, S., Kaya, E., & Dagher, Z. R. (2018). From Lists in Pieces to Coherent Wholes: Nature of Science, Scientific Practices, and Science Teacher Education. In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond (pp. 3-24). Singapore: Springer.
- Feyerabend, P. (1962). Knowledge without foundations. Oberlin: Oberlin College.
- Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
- Giere, R. N. (1985). Constructive realism. Images of Science, 75-98.
- Good, R., & Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in Benchmarks and Standards: Postmodern/relativist or modern/realist? Science & Education, 10, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789610357
- Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2008). Consensus: Expanding the scientific method and school science. Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation, 304-325.
- Harding, P., & Hare, W. (2000). Portraying science accurately in classrooms: Emphasizing open-mindedness rather than relativism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-G
- Hodson, D. (1991). Philosophy of science and science education. In M. Matthews (Ed.) History, philosophy and science teaching. Toronto: OISE Press/Columbia University Press.
- Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
- Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Taipei: Sense Publishers.
- Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Taipei: Sense Publishers.
- Hodson, D. (2014). Nature of science in the science curriculum: Origin, development, implications and shifting emphases. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching, (pp. 911-970). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2017). Going beyond the consensus view: Broadening and enriching the scope of NOS-oriented curricula. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271919
- Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1025
- Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422-447 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20305
- Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011a). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4
- Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011b). A family resemblance approach. Plenary presentation session with N. Lederman titled: Current philosophical and educational issues in nature of science (NOS) research, and possible future directions. Presented at the International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (IHPST) Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Irzik, G. & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. (pp. 999-1021). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Kampa, N., & Koller, O. (2016). German national proficiency scales in biology: Internal structure, relations to general cognitive abilities and verbal skills. Science Education, 100(5), 903-922. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21227
- Kampourakis, K. (2016). The "general aspects" conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
- Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139-152.
- Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or how the Family Resemblance Approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25(9-10), 1115-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9861-3
- Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Akgun, S., & Aksoz, B. (2017). Nature of Science in Teacher Education: A Holistic Approach. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 11(2).
- Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
- Kim, M. (2016). Educational Effects of the Integrated Science Developed Under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum: Focused on Student's Views on Nature of Science and Science-Technology-Society Relationship, Interest in Science, and Science Aspiration (Master's thesis). Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea.
- Kim, H. (1997). Sociological understanding of science and technology. Science, Philosophy & Culture, 20, 223-238.
- Kotter, M., & Hammann, M. (2017). Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science. Science & Education, 26(5), 451-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9913-3
- Kwak Y. (2001). Theoretical background of constructivist epistemology. Journal of Korean Earth Sience Society, 22(5). 427-447.
- Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Criticism and the growth of knowledge, 4, 91-196.
- Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., ... & Wykstra, S. (1986). Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research. Synthese, 69(2), 141-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413981
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). Springer: Dordrecht.
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 831-879). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
- Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
- Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Volume II), (pp. 1739-1815). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry-The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
- Lee, J-W, Park, Y-S, & Jeong, D-H. (2016). Exploring the level of nature of science and its degree of revising curriculums: The case of the 7th and 2009 revised curriculums. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 9(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2016.9.2.217
- Lee, S. J. (2008) A Study of Future-oriented Practical Arts(Technology and Home Economics) Curriculum. Korean Association of Practical Arts Education, 21(3), 21-39.
- Martins, A. F. P. (2015). Natureza da Ciencia no ensino de ciencias: uma proposta baseada em "temas" e "questoes". Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Fisica, 32(3), 703-737. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2015v32n3p703
- Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge: Psychology Press.
- Matthews, M. R. (1997). Editorial. Science & Education, 6(4), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008627112693
- Matthews, M. R. (2001). How pendulum studies can promote knowledge of the nature of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012299219996
- Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: from nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research. Concepts and methodologies (pp. 3-26). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of research on history, philosophy and sociology of science. Dordrecht: Springer.
- McCain, K. (2016). The nature of scientific knowledge: An explanatory approach. Switzerland: Springer.
- McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10205.x
- McComas, W. F. (2005). Teaching the nature of science: What illustrations and examples exist in popular books on the subject. In Eighth International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching (IHPST) Conference, Leeds, UK (July 15-18).
- McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2-3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y
- McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300503
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
- Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
- Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015). 2015 revised national curriculum of science. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
- Mirowski, P., & Sent, E. M. (2008). The commercialization of science and the response of STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch (Ed.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (pp. 635-689). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moss, P. A., Phillips, D. C., Erickson, F. D., Floden, R. E., Lather, P. A., & Schneider, B. L. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research. Educational Researcher, 38 (7), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09348351
- Musgrave, A. (1998). Realism versus constructive empiricism. In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues (pp. 1088-1113). New York: Norton.
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author.
- Neumann, K., Fischer, H. E., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to educational standards: The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 545-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Noh, T., Kim, Y., Han, S., & Kang, S. (2002). Elementary school students' views on the nature of science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(4), 882-891.
- Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2009). Scientific literacy. The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 271-285.
- NW. (2014). Kernlehrplan fur die Sekundarstufe II, Gymnasium, Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen. MSW: Philosophie.
- Oliveira, A. W., Akerson, V. L., Colak, H., Pongsanon, K., & Genel, A. (2012). The implicit communication of nature of science and epistemology during inquiry discussion. Science Education, 96(4), 652-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21005
- Osborne, J. F. (2007). Science Education for the Twenty First Century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3).
- Osborne, J. F. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
- Osborne, J. F. (2017). Going beyond the consensus view: A response. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271920
- Osborne, J. F., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-about science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
- Polanyi, M. (2002/1969). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. From knowing and being. Reproduced in P. Mirowsky & E. M. Sent (Eds.), Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science (pp. 465-485). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770302
- Resnik, D. B. (2007). The price of truth: How money affects the norms of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Volume I), (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Science and scientific literacy. In N. G. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2013). Whither the VNOS?. Aprendendo ciencia, 225.
- Rudolph, J. L. (2000). Reconsidering the 'nature of science' as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182628
- Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
- Ryder, J. (2009). Enhancing engagement with science/technology-related issues. In A. T. Jones & M. J. deVries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education, (pp. 287-296). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
- Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate Science Students' Images of Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<201::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-H
- Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Salomon, J. (1985). Science as a commodity-policy changes, issues and threats. In M. Gibbons & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Science as a commodity, (pp. 78-98). Harlow, UK: Longman.
- Settlage, J., Madsen, A., & Rustad, K. (2005). Inquiry Science, Sheltered Instruction, and English Language Learners: Conflicting Pedagogies in Highly Diverse Classrooms. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(1), 39-57.
- SL (2008). Lehrplan. MfB: Philosophie.
- Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83(4), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U
- Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<35::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-6
- Swinbank, E. & Taylor, J. (2007). Perspectives on Science. The History, Philosophy and Ethics of Science. Teachers' Resource File, Oxford: Heinemann.
- van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. I). Singapore: Sage Publishing.
- van Fraassen, B. C. (1998). Arguments concerning scientific realism. In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues, (pp. 1064-1087). New York: Norton.
- Wheeler-Toppen, J. L. (2005). Teaching NOS Tenets: Is it time for a change? Paper presented at the Association of Science Teacher Educators (ASTE) 2005 Conference, Colorado Springs, CO. January 19-23.
- Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2010). More from the horse's mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1431-1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104465
- Yacoubian, H. A. (2012). Towards a philosophically and a pedagogically reasonable nature of science curriculum. Alberta: University of Alberta.
- Yacoubian, H. A. (2015). A framework for guiding future citizens to think critically about nature of science and socioscientific issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 248-260.
- Yang, C., Kim, M., & Noh, T. (2015). The Influences of Integrated Science developed Under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum on Students' Views on Nature of Science and Science-Technology-Society Relationship, Interest in Science, and Science Aspiration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0549
- Yang, S. (2019, in progress). Representations of Nature of Science in New Korean Science Textbooks: The Case of 'Science Laboratory Experiment' (Master's thesis). Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea.
- Zammito, J. H. (2004). A nice derangement of epistemes: Post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ziman, J. (2000). Are debatable scientific questions debatable?. Social Epistemology, 14(2-3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720050199225
Cited by
- A Comparative Study on the Various Perspectives on the Nature of Science through Textbook Analysis Centering on the Consensus View, Features of Science, and Family Resemblance Approach vol.39, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.681
- 지구과학의 본성에 대한 연구방법 제안 -현상학적 접근 및 과학의 본성(NOS)에 대한 가족유사성 접근의 활용- vol.40, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.1.51