Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technology Acceptance and Influencing Factor of Anatomy Learning using Augmented Reality :Usability Based on the Technology Acceptance Model

증강현실(Augmented Reality)을 이용한 해부학 학습에 대한 기술 수용도와 영향요인: 기술수용모델에 기초한 사용성 조사

  • An, Jiwon (Department of Nursing, Far East University)
  • Received : 2019.11.20
  • Accepted : 2019.12.20
  • Published : 2019.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality is suitable to apply the contents of a textbook so as to be directly observable by learners. This study aimed to examine the applicability and technology acceptance of anatomy learning using AR in nursing students. This study was conducted in May 2019 with 17 nursing students who studied an anatomy textbook using AR and answered a questionnaire about technology acceptance and the usability of AR in combination with the anatomy textbook. Perceived usefulness was identified as an influencing factor on technology acceptance with 51.2% acceptance rate and thus should be taken into consideration in the development of learning strategies using new technological learning methods.

가상현실과 증강현실은 교육 분야에서 학습자가 직접 관찰하기 어렵거나 텍스트로 설명하기 어려운 학습의 내용을 교육 분야에 적용하기에 유용하다. 본 연구는 TAM (technology acceptance model)을 바탕으로 증강현실을 이용한 해부학 교육을 통하여 간호학생의 기술 수용도를 탐색하는 연구로 2019년 5월 K대학에 재학 중인 간호학과 1, 2학년 학생들 중 편의표집한 17명을 대상으로 하였다. 대상자에게 증강현실을 활용한 해부학 학습을 완료한 후 기술 수용도에 대한 설문을 작성하도록 하였고 증강현실을 활용한 학습방법의 사용성(usability)을 탐색하였다. 다중회귀분석 결과 51.2%의 설명력으로 인지된 유용성이 높을수록 기술 수용도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 새로운 기술을 활용한 학습방법을 적용할 때 기술의 유용성을 고려한 학습전략을 개발하는 것이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Lee, S. A. Cha & H. N. Kwon. (2016). Study on the Effect of Augmented Reality Contents-Based Instruction for Adult Learners on Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 424-437. DOI : 10.5392/jkca.2016.16.01.424
  2. C. Ferguson, P. M.. Davidson, P. J. Scott, D/ Jackson & L. D. Hickman. (2015). Augmented reality, virtual reality and gaming: an integral part of nursing. Contemp Nurse, 51(1), 1-4. DOI :10.1080/10376178.2015.1130360
  3. K. H. Noh, H. K. Jee & S. Lim. (2010). Effect of Augmented Reality Contents Based Instruction on Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow of Learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(2), 1-13. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.2.001
  4. M. Billinghurst & A. Duenser. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
  5. H. K. Wu, S. W. Lee, H. Y. Chang & J. C. Liang. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education, 62, 41-49. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  6. S. H. Jang & B. K. Kye. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents. The Korea Contents Association Review, 5(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.20924/CCTHBL.2007.5.2.079
  7. A. Dunser & E. Hornecker. (2007, February). Lessons from an AR book study. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp. 179-182). ACM.
  8. M. Aebersold, T. Voepel-Lewis, L. Cherara, M. Weber, C. Khouri, R. Levine & A. R. Tait. (2018). Interactive Anatomy-Augmented Virtual Simulation Training. Clin Simul Nurs, 15, 34-41. DOI : 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.09.008
  9. R. Barmaki et al. (2019). Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting. Anat Sci Educ . DOI : 10.1002/ase.1858
  10. S. S. Jamali, M. F. Shiratuddin, K. W. Wong & C. L. Oskam. (2015). Utilising Mobile-Augmented Reality for Learning Human Anatomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659-668. DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054
  11. D. Kugelmann et al. (2018). An Augmented Reality magic mirror as additive teaching device for gross anatomy. Ann Anat, 215, 71-77. DOI : 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.09.011
  12. F. D. Davis. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. DOI : 10.2307/249008
  13. V. Venkatesh & F. D. Davis. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  14. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis & F. D. Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. DOI : 10.2307/30036540
  15. R. Agarwal & J. Prasad. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. DOI : 10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  16. E. M. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd Ed.). NY: Simon and Schuster.
  17. R. C. M. Yusoff, A. Ahmad & H. B. Zaman. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8 ).
  18. Y. L. Theng, C. M. L. Lim, W. Liu & A. D. Cheok. (2007). Mixed reality systems for learning. A pilot study understanding user perceptions and acceptance. In Proceedings of HCI (14) (pp. 728-737). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. DOI :10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_7
  19. M. A. Birkett & S. J. Day. (1994). Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 2455-2463. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780132309
  20. S. A. Julious. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4, 287-291. DOI : 10.1002/pst.185
  21. DEVAR. (2018). Anatomy: Human body, Encyclopedia in augmented reality, New York : DEVAR Entertainment, LLC.
  22. DEVAR. (2018). Anatomy: Human organs, Encyclopedia in augmented reality, New York : DEVAR Entertainment, LLC.
  23. R. Azuma, M. Billinghurst & G. Klinker. (2011). Special Section on Mobile Augmented Reality. Computers & Graphics, 35 (4), vii-viii. DOI : 10.1016/j.cag.2011. 05.002
  24. S. Cho, Y. Jeong & C. Oh. (2018). A Study on the Improvement of the Supporting Policy Efficiendy through the Analysis of the Demand for Direct Commercialization of Technology in Universities and Research Institutes. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(5), 229-236. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.5.229
  25. I. Cho. (2019). Structural study on storytelling of VR contents. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(1), 295-300. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.1.295
  26. K. Lee. (2012). The Future of Learning and Training in Augmented Reality. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 7, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.46504/07201202le