DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Emotional Leadership on Innovative Behavior and Psychological Depression of Bankers: Analysis of Double Mediation Effect

감성리더십이 은행원의 혁신행동과 심리적 우울에 미치는 영향: 이중매개효과 분석

  • Received : 2019.07.02
  • Accepted : 2019.10.11
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of "emotional leadership" on innovative behavior and psychological depression through mediation of job engagement and self-efficacy. In order to accomplish this objective, hypotheses were set up and we distributed questionnaires to bankers and analyzed the final 294 copies. For the hypothesis test, the SPSS Process Macro was used for regression analysis and double mediation. As a result, emotional leadership positively affects self-efficacy, and self-efficacy positively affects job engagement and innovation behavior. Also, job engagement has a negative effect on psychological depression. As a result of verifying the dual mediation effect, both self-efficacy and job engagement showed a full mediating effect.

본 연구는 은행원을 대상으로 감성리더십이 자기효능감과 직무열의의 매개를 통해 혁신행동과 심리적 우울에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 가설들을 설정하고 은행원들을 대상으로 설문조사를 시행하여 최종 294부를 분석하였다. 가설검증을 위해 회귀분석과 이중매개효과 검증을 위해 SPSS Process Macro를 활용하였다. 분석결과, 감성리더십은 자기효능감에 정(+)적으로 유의하게 영향을 미치며, 자기효능감은 직무열의 및 혁신행동에 정(+)적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 직무열의는 심리적 우울에 부(-)적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 조사되었다. 또한 이중매개효과를 검증한 결과 자기효능감과 직무열의는 모두 완전매개효과를 보여주고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abraham I . L., Neese J, B., and Westerman, P. S. (2008). Depression, Nursing Implications of a Clinical and Social Problem, Nursing Clinics of North Amercia, 26(1), 1-7.
  2. Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.) , Edward Elgar Publishing.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-efficacy Theory, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: W. H. Freeman.
  6. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., and Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of Affective Self-Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning, Child Development, 74(3), 769-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00567
  7. Bakker, A. B., and Geurts, S. (2004). Toward a Dual-process Model of Work-home Interference, Work and Occupations, 31(3), 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404266349
  8. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., and McKee, A. (2002). Primal Leadership-Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence, Harvard Business School Press Books.
  9. Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., and Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive Gain Spirals at Work: From Job Resources to Work Engagement, Personal Initiative and Work-unit Innovativeness, Journal of Vocational Behavior , 73(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003
  10. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, New York: Guilford Press.
  11. Hong, J. Y. (2015). The Relationship among Child Care Center Director's Emotional Leadership, Teachers' Emotional Intelligence, Teacher Efficacy, and the Interaction between Teachers and Children, Ph. D. Thesis, Graduate School of Anyang University, Gyeonggi, Korea.
  12. Janssen, O. (2000). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  13. Ji. S. H., and Kang. Y. S. (2012). The Mediating Effect of Continuous Learning Behavior in the Relationship Goal Orientation and Innovative Behavior, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 14, 2745-2759.
  14. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  15. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
  16. Konstantellou, E. (2001). An Exploratory Investigation of Enjoyment at Work: A Cross- National Approach (Unpublished Master Thesis), University of Surrey.
  17. Lee, M. S., and Kang, Y. S. (2003). Relationship between Creativity and Innovative Behavior; Moderating Effects of Organizational Situations, Journal of Organization and Management, 27(1), 251-271.
  18. Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., and Salanova, M. (2007). Does a Positive Gain Spiral of Resources, Efficacy Beliefs and Engagement Exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012
  19. Lopez, A. D., and Murray, C. C. (1998). The Global Burden of Disease, 1990-2020. Nature Medicine, 4(11), 1241-1243. https://doi.org/10.1038/3218
  20. Maslach, C. and Leiter, M. P. (1997). The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to do about It, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  21. Moon, Y. S., and Hur, Y. H. (2010). Police Officers' Perception on Organizational Trust and It's Influence on Self-efficacy, Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice Review, 38, 71-104.
  22. Park, Y. K., Song. J. H., Yoon, S. W., and Kim. J. W. (2014). Learning Organization and Innovation Behavior, European Journal of Training and Development. 38,(1/2), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040
  23. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., and Teach, R. (1993). Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-151. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
  24. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., and Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire a Cross-national Study, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  25. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., and Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  26. Schwarzer, R., and Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson, 35-37.
  27. Scott, S. G., and Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  28. Sherer, M., and Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct Validation of the Self-efficacy Scale, Psychological Reports, 53, 899-902. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899
  29. Song, E. K. (2012). The Causal Relationships between the Director' Emotional Leadership, the Preschool Teachers' Role Conflicts, their Teacher Efficacy and their Organizational, Commitment, Ph. D. Thesis, Graduate School of Daegu University, Gyeongbuk, Korea.
  30. Yeom, M. K. (2015), The Effect of J ob Stress of Train Traffic Controllers on Fatigue, Depression and Cognitive Failure, Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Yi. R. (2006). The Role of Emotional Labor Strategies in the J ob Demand-resource Model with Burnout and Engagement: Call Cetre Employees Case, Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Ajou-University, Suwon, Korea.
  32. Wiener, Y., and Vardi, Y. (1980). Relationships Job, Organization, and Career Commitments and Work Outcomes - An Integrative Approach, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(80)90048-3
  33. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., and Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work Engagement and Financial Returns: A Diary Study on the Role of Job and Personal Resources, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285633