The Korean Journal of Archival Studies (기록학연구)

  • Issue 59
  • /
  • Pages.5-46
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-7941(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7891(eISSN)
Korea Society of Archival Studies (한국기록학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Concepts of Records as Persistent Representation of Activities

기록이란 무엇인가? 활동의 고정적 재현물로서의 개념 탐구

  • 설문원 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.12.31
  • Accepted : 2019.01.23
  • Published : 2019.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to explore the concepts and nature of records in digital environments based on analyzing recent theoretical studies of records. This is not intended to defining records for management in a specific environment. This study is divided into two parts. Firstly, it classifies the definitions of records in three perspectives; evidence, information, and representation of activities, and explores the concepts and theoretical backgrounds underlying each definition. Secondly, it articulates some implications for understanding the concept and nature of records in digital environments by four categories such as i) fixity, ii) materiality, iii) activity and context, and iv) trustworthiness, which were derived from the definition of "persistent representation of activities" by Geoffrey Yeo.

이 연구는 디지털 환경에서의 기록의 본질과 개념적 정의를 탐구하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이 연구는 크게 두 부분으로 나눌 수 있다. 첫째, 기록에 대한 정의(definition)가 어떻게 전개되어 왔는지를 살펴보았다. 기록의 정의를 증거, 정보, 활동의 재현물이라는 세 가지 측면에서 정리하였다. 특히 각 정의의 근거가 되는 개념과 이론적 배경을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 둘째, 기록의 개념과 본질을 파악하기 위하여 제프리 여의 "활동의 지속적 재현물"이라는 정의를 중심으로 네 개의 분석 영역을 도출하고 각 영역을 둘러싼 논의를 분석하였다. 기록이 활동의 고정적 재현이라는 개념에 입각하여 고정성(fixity)을 도출하고, 고정성이 물질에 기반한다는 점에서 물질성(materiality)을 설정하였다. 또한 활동은 어떻게 기록이라는 재현물로 표현되며 그러한 재현물을 통해 활동을 이해할 수 있는 메커니즘을 무엇인지 짚어보기 위하여 활동과 맥락을 분석대상으로 설정하였고, 그렇게 존재하는 재현물을 신뢰한다는 것은 무엇을 의미하는지 신빙성(trustworthiness)을 중심으로 살펴보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 설문원 2018. 공공기관의 책임성 강화를 위한 기록평가제도의 재설계. 기록학연구, 55, 5-38.
  2. 정동열, 조찬식. 2007. 문헌정보학 총론. 서울 : 한국도서관협회.
  3. KS X ISO 16175-3, 문헌정보-전자사무환경에서 기록관리 원리 및 기능요건-제3부 : 업무시스템의 기록관리 지침과 기능 요건.
  4. Acker, Amelia. 2017. When is a record? : A research framework for locating electronic records in infrastructure. In : Research in Archival Multiverse, Ch. 9. Anne J Gilliland, Sue McKemmish and Andrew J Lau. Clayton ed. Monash University Publishing, 288-323.
  5. Anderson, Kimberly D. 2013. The footprint and the stepping foot : archival records, evidence, and time. Archival Science 13(4).
  6. Brothman, Brien. 2002. Afterglow : Conceptions of record and evidence in archival discourse. Archival Science 2, 311-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435627
  7. Cook, T. 1997. What is past is prologue. A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43, 17-63.
  8. Dervin, B. 1997. Given a context by any other name. Methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. In : Information Seeking in Context. P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, B. Dervin eds. London : Taylor Graham, 13-38.
  9. Duranti, Luciana. 2002. The concept of electronic records. In : Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Chapter 1. Duranti, Luciana; Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather. eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 9-22.
  10. Duranti, Luciana. 2010. Diplomatics. In : Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd ed. M.J. Bates and M.N. Maack eds. Boca Raton : CRC Press.
  11. Duranti, Luciana. 1997. The archival bond. Archives & Museum Informatics, 11(3-4), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009025127463
  12. Jeurgens, Charles. 2017. Threats of the data-flood. An accountability perspective in the era of ubiquitous computing. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Edited by : Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker. Den Haag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 196-210.
  13. Dearstyne, Bruce W. The Archival Enterprise. Chicago : American Library Association, 1993.
  14. Duranti, Luciana. 2002. The concept of electronic record. In : The Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Luciana Duranti, Terry Eastwood, Heather MacNeil eds. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers. 9-22.
  15. Glaudemans, Arnoud; Jonker, Rienk & Smith, Frans. 2017a. Beyond the traditionalboundaries of archival theory : An Interview with Eric Ketelaar. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Frans Smit, Glaudemans, Arnoud & Jonker, Rienk eds. DenHaag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 294-305.
  16. Glaudemans, Arnoud; Jonker, Rienk & Smith, Frans. 2017b. Documents, archives and hyperhistorical societies : An interview with Luciano Floridi. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker eds. Den Haag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 306-321.
  17. Hurley, C. 1995. Ambient functions : abandoned children to zoos. Archivaria, 40(Fall), 21-39.
  18. International Council on Archives. 1997. Guide for Managing Electronic Records from an Archival Perspective. Paris : International Council on Archives.
  19. ISO 15489-1 : 2016. Information and documentation-Records management-Part 1 : Concepts and principles.
  20. Jenkinson, H. 1984. Reflections of an archivist. In : Daniels M, Walch T (eds) A Modern Archives Reader : Basic Readings on Archival Theory and Practice. National Archives and Records Service, U.S. General Services Administration,Washington, D.C, 19-20.
  21. Jonker, Rienk. 2017. A perfect match? Connecting partners in the labyrinth of information. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker eds. Den Haag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 72-91.
  22. Kahn Consulting, Inc. 2013. Information Governance : How IG helps you meet corporate responsibilities.
  23. Kahn, Randolph & Blair, Barclay. 2009. Information Nation : Seven Keys to Information Management. Wiley Publishing.
  24. Lemieux V. 2001. Let the ghosts speak : an empirical exploration of the "nature" of the record. Archivaria 51, 81-110.
  25. 0'Toole, James M. 1993. The symbolic Significance of Archives. American Archivists 56, 234-55. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.56.2.e481x55xg3x04201
  26. Penn, Ira A; Pennix, Gail & Coulson, Jim. 1994. Records Management Handbook, 2nd ed. Aldershot, England : Gower, 1994.
  27. RSD. 2014. Defining Information Governance Policies. Retrieved 2015. 10. 6. www.rsd.com.
  28. Shepherd, Elizabeth & Geoffrey Yeo. 2003. Managing Record : A Handbook of principles and Practice. London : Facet Publishing.
  29. The State Records Authority of New South Wales. Website. Retrieved 2016. 1. 20.
  30. Thibodeau, Kenneth. 2002. Overview of technological approach to digital preservation and challenges in coming years. In : The State of Digital Preservation : An International Perspective. 3-31.
  31. Van Bussel, G. J. 2012. Reconstructing the past for organizational accountability. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 15(2), 127-137. Retrieved 2018. 12. 1. from www.ejise.com.
  32. Van Bussel, G. J. 2017a. The theoretical framework for the 'Archive-As-Is'. an organization oriented view on archives, Part I. Setting the stage : Enterprise information management and archival theories. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker eds. Den Haag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 16-41.
  33. Van Bussel, G. J. 2017b. The theoretical framework for the 'Archive-As-Is'. an organization oriented view on srchives, Part II. An exploration of the 'Archive-As-Is' framework. In : Archives in Liquid Times. Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker eds. Den Haag : Stichting Archiefpublicaties, 42-71.
  34. Yeo, Geoffrey. 2007. Concepts of record (1) : Evidence, information, and persistent representations. The American Archivist 70(Fall/Winter 2007), 315-343.
  35. Yeo, Geoffrey. 2018. Records, Information and Data : Exploring the Role of Record -Keeping in an Information Culture. Facet Publishing.

Cited by

  1. 기록 평가에 관한 국제표준의 적용방안 분석: ISO 15489-1과 ISO/TR 21946을 중심으로 vol.19, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2019.19.4.115
  2. 판례 분석을 통한 기록의 성립 요건 검토: '남북정상회담회의록 삭제' 판례를 중심으로 vol.21, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2021.21.1.041