Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Records Management in Scientific Research Institutes by Applying DMP

과학기술분야 연구기관의 DMP를 적용한 연구기록물 관리

  • Received : 2018.07.19
  • Accepted : 2019.02.11
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Research records are essential records to explain the accountability of research throughout the life cycle of a research project. Thus, they need to be properly managed, preserved, and shared. This study analyzed the effectiveness and ability of applying DMP to research records management. This study also suggested the RRMP (Research Records Management Plan) for the research records management and preservation in scientific research institutes. RRMP is considered as up-front planning for the research records management and preservation before any records are created.

과학기술분야 연구기관의 연구기록물은 연구개발사업 생애주기 전반에 걸친 설명책임을 이행하기 위한 핵심기록이다. 따라서 연구기록물은 체계적으로 관리되고, 보존되어 공유될 수 있어야 한다. 이 연구는 연구기록물 관리 방안으로 DMP의 적용 효용성을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 생산 이전단계에서의 연구기록물 관리의 필요성과 연구개발사업과 연구기록물간의 관계정보 관리의 중요성을 발견하였다. 이를 바탕으로 과학기술분야 연구기관에서 연구기록물 관리에 활용할 수 있도록 DMP를 적용하여 '연구기록물 관리계획(RRMP)'을 제안하였다.

Keywords

HKGRBG_2019_v19n1_1_f0001.png 이미지

<그림 1> 미국 국립과학재단(NSF)의 DMP 작성항목(예시)

HKGRBG_2019_v19n1_1_f0002.png 이미지

<그림 2> ICA에서 제시한 연구개발 프로세스와 아카이브

<표 1> RRMP 모델의 계획서정보 상세항목

HKGRBG_2019_v19n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

<표 2> RRMP 모델의 연구개발사업 정보 상세항목

HKGRBG_2019_v19n1_1_t0002.png 이미지

<표 3> RRMP 모델의 연구기록물 정보 상세항목

HKGRBG_2019_v19n1_1_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Koo, Chan Mi & Kim, Soom-Hee (2017). An Analysis of the Value and Characteristics of Research Records from a Perspective of Archives and Records Management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 49-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.3.049
  2. National Archives Innovation TF (2017.12.31). National Archives Innovation. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  3. National Archives of Korea (2012a). Composition and Management Procedure of the Records Management Reference Table. v2.1.
  4. National Archives of Korea (2012b). Metadata Standard for Records and Archives Management. v2.1.
  5. Kim, Rosa & Chang, Woo Kwon (2016). A study on the record management manual for R&D management: a focus on government-supported science research institutes. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(3), 179-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.3.179
  6. Kim, Sang-Jun (2008). Importance and management of the laboratory notebooks in the research record. Journal of Information Management, 39(2), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.2.045
  7. Kim, Suntae (2017). Research Data Management and DMP. Conference of Korea Society for Information Management.
  8. Kim, Su Jin & Chung, Eunkyung (2012). Toward Research Records Management in Governmentfunded Research Institutes. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 109-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.109
  9. Kim, Ik-Han (2002). EDMS and life-cycle of records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 5, 3-38.
  10. Kim, Jihyun (2014). A Study on Research Data Management Services of Research University Libraries in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 165-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
  11. Kim, Jihyun (2015). A study on the perceptions of university researchers on data management and sharing. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(3), 413-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.413
  12. Park, Jae-Hak (2006). A study on records management of the government-supported research institutes. Master's Thesis, Department of Archival Science, Graduate School, Chungnam National University.
  13. Park, Jitae (2011). Records Management. Records Management Series 1, Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  14. Seo, Kwang-Sick (2006). Construction of an archives management system for establishing a knowledge management foundation: focusing on research institute A. Master's Thesis, Department of Archival Science, Graduate School, Chungnam National University.
  15. Seol, Moon-won (2017). An Analysis of Discourses on Interpreting and Applying the Principle of Provenance in Archival Organization. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 52, 60-119.
  16. Shim, Wonsik (2015). Developing a Roadmap for National Research Data Management Governance: Based on the Analysis of United Kingdom's Case. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.355
  17. Lee, Mi-Young (2014). A study on the appraisal of research records in science and technology: focusing on foreign cases. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 41, 75-111.
  18. Lee, Mi-Young (2018). A Case Study on Redesigning the Retention Schedule of Common Functions in National Research Institutes of Science and Technology. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(3), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.3.125
  19. Jeong, Se-Young (2007). A study on R&D archives management system analysis and development program: focusing on research institute K. Master's Thesis, Department of Archival Science, Graduate School, Chungnam National University.
  20. Cho, Eun-Hee & Yim, Jin-Hee (2009). A Study on Record Selection Strategy and Procedure in Dataset for Administrative Information. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 251-291.
  21. Ju, Hyun Mi & Yim, Jin Hee (2017). A Study of Next-generation Electronic Records Management Redesign. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 54, 151-178.
  22. Han, Jong Gyu (2017). Lessons from Data Repository GDR (Geoscience Data Repository) Building Experience. Conference of Korea Society for Information Management, 100.
  23. Atkins Daniel, Droegemeier Kelvin, Feldman Stuart, Garcia-Molina Hector, Klein Michael, Messerschmitt David, et al. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation. 2003.
  24. Australian Resarch Council. Research Data Management. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from http://www.arc.gov.au/research-data-management
  25. BIC STAR Library. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from http://starlibrary.org
  26. DMP Online Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk/
  27. H. R.708 - Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act of 2013.
  28. Hofman, Hans (2006). Standards: not 'one size fits all'. The Information Management Journal, May/June 2006, 36-45.
  29. International Council on Archives (2010). Management and preservation of scientific records and data.
  30. International Council on Archives /Committee On Electronic Records(ICA/CER). (Feb. 1997). Guide for managing electronic records from an archival perspective.
  31. Jin, D., Lee, M. C. (2014). Establishing Korean polar data management policy and its future directions. Data Science Journal, 13, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.IFPDA-03
  32. U.S. Commerce, Energy, NASA, National Library of Medicine, Defense, Interior[CENDI]. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from https://www.cendi.gov
  33. U.S. Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age (2009). Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age. Washington DC.: National Academy of Sciences.
  34. U.S. National Science Foundation (2010.11). Data management & sharing frequently asked questions. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmpfaqs.jsp
  35. U.S. National Science Foundation (2010.5). News Release 10-077: Scientists seeking NSF funding will soon be required to submit data management plans. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=116928
  36. U.S. National Science Foundation (2015.10.1.) Directorate for biological sciences updated information about the data management plan required for full proposals. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from https://www.nsf.gov/bio/pubs/BIODMP_Guidance.pdf
  37. U.S. National Science Foundation (2017.1), Proposal and awards policies and procedures guide. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf17001&org=NSF
  38. University of Virginia Library. Research data management: what is a data management plan? Retrieved Jan. 11, 2019, from http://guides.lib.virginia.edu/c.php?g=515290&p=3520792
  39. Veerle Van den Eynden, Louise Corti, Matthew Woollard, Libby Bishop and Laurence Horton. Managing and sharing data: best practice for researchers. Third edition. Colchester, UK: UK Data Archive, University of Essex. 2011. p. 6.