Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of English Teaching Method by Convergence of Project-based Learning and Problem-based Learning for English Communication

프로젝트 기반과 문제해결 기반 융합 학습을 통한 영어 의사소통 교수법에 관한 연구

  • 신명희 (한남대학교 탈메이지 교양교육대학)
  • Received : 2018.12.31
  • Accepted : 2019.02.20
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the effects of student-centered project-based learning for the development of creative problem-solving skills, communication skills, critical thinking skills, and cooperation. A college students' creative personality test was used and pre-and post-test were performed. and TOEIC Speaking practice test by Educational Testing Service were selected to measure the English communication skills. The SPSS 18.0 was used and validated at a significance level of 5%. The result of this study shows that in the case of 'independence', the post-test average of the experimental group was statistically significant at the significant level (p<.01), which also showed statistically significant difference. There was statistically significant difference between the control group ($M=127{\pm}08.2$) and in the experimental group ($M=132{\pm}18.7$) applying project-based and problem-based convergent learning to English class were positively changed.

본 연구는 창의적 문제 해결 기술, 커뮤니케이션 기술, 비판적 사고 기술 및 협력의 개발을 위한 학생 중심 프로젝트 기반 학습의 효과를 알아보고자 창의적 성격 테스트를 실시하였다. 프로젝트와 문제해결 기반 학습 이후 영어 커뮤니케이션 향상 측정을 위해 ETS(교육 테스트 서비스)가 발행한 토익 말하기 평가 항목을 선정하였고 측정의 신뢰성은 be ${\alpha}=.84$으로 나타났다. 독립 표본 t-검사 및 유의 수준 5%에서 SPSS 18.0이 사용 및 검증되었다. 이 연구의 결과는 '독립성'의 경우 실험 그룹의 시험 후 평균이 유의 수준(p <.01)에서 통계적으로 유의했고, '개방성'(실험군 M = 3.24, 통제군 M = 2.73)의 경우 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 토익시험 결과, 실험군 평균은 200명 중 $132{\pm}18.7$명, 대조군 평균은 $127{\pm}08.2$명이었다. 영어 수업에 프로젝트, 문제해결 기반 융합 학습을 적용하는 실험군과 통제군 사이에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 이 연구의 결과로, 대학 강의실에서 프로젝트, 문제해결 기반 융합 학습을 적용하는 것은 창의적 성격 하위 차원들 사이의 독립성과 개방성에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다.

Keywords

Table 1. The main themes of the project-based and problem-based convergent learning application

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_83_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Reliability coefficient by sub-factors of creative personality test

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_83_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The result of pre and post-test between the experimental and control group

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_83_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Average TOEC Speaking Score (Pre & Post -test)

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_83_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. R. G. Harrington. (1984). Effects of verbal self-instruction on creative play in preschool-aged children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(2), 143-151. DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00376.x
  2. S. Monika. (2016). Creativity in foreign language teaching Journal of Education Culture, 16, 141-168. DOI : 10.15503/jecs20162.180.188
  3. M. Robyn (2015). The relationship between creativity, social play, and children's language abilities. Journal of Early Child Development and Care, 185(7). DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2014.983916
  4. M. Y. Lee & D. Y. Lee. (2004). Language and Linguistics. Seoul: Yeoklack.
  5. J. S. Lee. (2017). A Study on the Premise and Contents Layout of Language - based Convergence Education. Korean language literature, 101, 175-199. https://doi.org/10.21793/koreall.2017.101.175
  6. D. Coyle, P. Hood, & D. Marsh. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444813000256.
  7. C. Adams. (2018). Buck Institute for Education http://www.bie.org/index.php/site/PBL/pbl_handbook_introduction/#history.
  8. J. Mergendoller. & J. Thomas. (2018). Managing project based learning: Principles from the field. http://www.bie.org/index.php/site/RE/pbl_research/29.
  9. E. P. Torrance. (1996). The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Massachusetts, Personal Press. 53-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
  10. E. Sagone (2013). The Influence of Creative Personality Factors on Interpersonal Adjustment in Adolescents: What's the Relationship?, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82(3), 131-136 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.236
  11. M. J. Choi & J.K. Kim (2016). Correlation of Art-centered Projects with Teamwork and Credibility, Learner-centered curriculum education research, 16(10). DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.10.403
  12. S. D. Lee. (2002). Development and Validation of Creative Personality Test for University Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16(2), 43-61
  13. D. E. Murray (2013). Case for Online English Language Teacher Education. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education 4(1).
  14. A. J. Starko (2013). Creativity in the classroom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115176
  15. E. Cindy (2004) Problem-based learning; What and How do students learn?, Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3