DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of the Overset Grid Scheme (Suggar++) for Flow Analysis around a Ship

선박의 유동해석 문제에 대한 중첩격자기법(Suggar++)의 활용

  • Kim, Yoo-Chul (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO)) ;
  • Kim, Yoonsik (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO)) ;
  • Kim, Jin (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO)) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Soo (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO))
  • Received : 2018.06.19
  • Accepted : 2018.10.17
  • Published : 2019.02.20

Abstract

Recent CFD solvers in engineering have to treat geometrically complex domains and moving body problems. In ship hydrodynamics, flow around the stern and ship motions in waves are examples of such cases mentioned before. The unstructured grid scheme is successfully applied for these problems, but it has weakness of inefficient memory usage and intensive computational time as compared to the structured grid method. Overset grid scheme is one of the alternatives for structured grid system taking advantage of fast and memory efficiency. Overset grid scheme is especially useful for moving body problem because there is no need to re-mesh around the body. In this paper, we adopted the Suggar++, the grid connectivity and interpolation utility for the overlapping grid, to WAVIS which is the in-house flow solver of KRISO. Then we introduced some applications using the overset grid method for flow analysis around the ships. The computed results show that WAVIS with Suggar++ is practically feasible and has an advantages for moving geometry cases.

Keywords

References

  1. Burggraf, O.R., 1966. Analytical and numerical studies of the structure of steady separated flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 24. pp.113-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066000545
  2. Carrica, P.M., Wilson, R.V., Noack, R.W., & Stern, F., 2007. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Computers & Fluids, 36(9), pp.1415-1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.01.007
  3. Castiglione, T., He, W., Stern, F., Bova, S., 2014. URANS simulation of catamaran interference in shallow water. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19(1), pp.33-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0230-5
  4. He, W., Castiglione, T., Kandasamy, M., & Stern, F., 2015. Numerical analysis of the interference effects on resistance, sinkage and trim of a fast catamaran. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20. pp. 292-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0283-0
  5. Heo, J.K., Ock, Y.B., Park, J.C., Jeong, S.M., & Akimoto, H., 2015. Overset-grid simulation technique for analysis of 2-DOF ship motions in waves. Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, 20(3), pp.20-26. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2015.20.3.20
  6. Hwang, S., Ahn, H., Lee, Y.Y., Kim, M.S., Van, S.H., Kim, K.S., Kim, J., & Jang, Y.H., 2016. Experimental study on the bow hull-form modification for added resistance reduction in waves of KVLCC2, The 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece, 26 June - 2 July 2016.
  7. Kim, J., Park, I.R., Kim, K.S., Van, S.H., 2005. RANS simulation for KRISO container ship and VLCC tanker. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 42. pp.593-600. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.6.593
  8. Kim, J., Park, I.R., Kim, K.S., Van, S.H., Kim, Y.C., 2011. Development of a numerical method for the evaluation of ship resistance and self-propulsion performances, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 48(2), pp.147-157. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2011.48.2.147
  9. Kim, K.S., Kim, J., Park, I.R., Kim, G.D., & Van, S.H., 2007a. RANS analysis for hull-propeller-rudder interaction of a commercial ship by using the overset grid scheme, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, 3(1), pp.251-264.
  10. Kim, K.S., Park, I.R., Kim, J., Kim, Y.J., Van, S.H., 2007b. RANS analysis for obliquely towed VLCC tanker by using the overset grid scheme, Proceedings of KAOSTS, Seoul, Korea, pp.895-904.
  11. Kim, K.S., Kim, J., Park, I.R., Kim, G.D., & Van, S.H., 2008. High fidelity RANS simulation for a self-propelled ship in model scale, Marine CFD 2008, pp.101-110.
  12. Kim, K.S., Kim, Y.C., Kim, Y., Kim, J., & Van, S.H., 2018. RANS simulations for propeller open water tests in towing tank, Proceedings of the 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Sapporo, Japan, 10 June - 15 June 2018.
  13. Kim, Y.C., Kim, K.S., Kim, J., Kim, Y., Park, I.R., & Jang, Y.H., 2017. Analysis of added resistance and seakeeping responses in head sea conditions for low-speed full ships using URANS approach. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 9(6), pp.641-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.03.001
  14. Kim, Y.C., Kim, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, K.S., 2018. Added resistance and 2DOF motion analysis of KVLCC2 in regular head waves using dynamic overset scheme. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 55(5), pp.385-393. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2018.55.5.385
  15. Nichols, R.H., Tramel, R.W., & Buning, P.G., 2006. Solvers and turbulence model upgrades to OVERFLOW 2 for unsteady and high-speed applications. AIAA 2006-2824, pp.1-34.
  16. Noack, R.W., Boger, D.A., & Kunz, R.F., 2009, Suggar++: An improved general overset grid assembly capability, 19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, USA, 22-25 June 2009.
  17. Prewitt, N.C., Belk, D.M., Shyy, W., 2002. Improvement in parallel chimera grid assembly. AIAA Journal, 40(3), pp.497-500. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1673
  18. SIMMAN2008, 2008, Workshop on Verification and Validation of Ship Manoeuvering Simulation Methods, URL: http://www.simman2008.dk [Accessed 02 March 2018].
  19. Suhs, N. E., Rogers, S. E., Dietz, & W. E., 2002. PEGASUS 5: an automated pre-processor for overset-grid CFD. AIAA 2002-3186, pp.1-16.
  20. Van, S.H., Yoon, H.S., Lee, Y.Y., Park, I.R., Lee, C.J., Kim, W.J., 2003. Measurement of flow around KRISO 138K LNG carrier model. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 40(2), pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2003.40.2.001