Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The evaluation of implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis in different bone types

  • Sargolzaie, Naser (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science) ;
  • Samizade, Sarah (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Sabzevar University of Medical Science) ;
  • Arab, Hamidreza (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science) ;
  • Ghanbari, Habibollah (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science) ;
  • Khodadadifard, Leila (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science) ;
  • Khajavi, Amin (Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science)
  • Received : 2018.04.12
  • Accepted : 2018.05.23
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Bone density seems to be an important factor affecting implant stability. The relationship between bone density and primary and secondary stability remains under debate. The aim of this study was to compare primary and secondary stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) between different bone types and to compare implant stability at different time points during 3 months of follow-up. Materials and Methods: Our study included 65 implants (BioHorizons Implant Systems) with 3.8 or 4.6 mm diameter and 9 or 10.5 mm length in 59 patients. Bone quality was assessed by Lekholm-Zarb classification. After implant insertion, stability was measured by an Osstell device using RFA at three follow-up visits (immediately, 1 month, and 3 months after implant insertion). ANOVA test was used to compare primary and secondary stability between different bone types and between the three time points for each density type. Results: There were 9 patients in type I, 18 patients in type II, 20 patients in type III, and 12 patients in type IV. Three implants failed, 1 in type I and 2 in type IV. Stability values decreased in the first month but increased during the following two months in all bone types. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between RFA values of different bone types at each follow-up or between stability values of each bone type at different time points. Conclusion: According to our results, implant stability was not affected by bone density. It is difficult to reach a certain conclusion about the effect of bone density on implant stability as stability is affected by numerous factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Farre-Pages N, Auge-Castro ML, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferres-Padro E, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e62-7.
  2. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:616-20. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00932.x
  3. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, Linden U, Lundqvist S, Rundcrantz T, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:462-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120505.x
  4. Park SW, Jang SM, Choi BH, Son HN, Park BC, Kim CH, et al. The study of bone density assessment on dental implant sites. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:417-22. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.5.417
  5. Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x
  6. Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Pereira AC, Rohlin M. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:789-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02041.x
  7. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-32
  8. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  9. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:192-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K
  10. Makary C, Rebaudi A, Sammartino G, Naaman N. Implant primary stability determined by resonance frequency analysis: correlation with insertion torque, histologic bone volume, and torsional stability at 6 weeks. Implant Dent 2012;21:474-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826918f1
  11. Coutant JC, Seguela V, Hauret L, Caix P, Ella B. Assessment of the correlation between implant stability and bone density by computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis in fresh cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1264-70. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2607
  12. Kahraman S, Bal BT, Asar NV, Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF. Clinical study on the insertion torque and wireless resonance frequency analysis in the assessment of torque capacity and stability of selftapping dental implants. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:755-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01990.x
  13. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54.
  14. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
  15. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  16. Kavita GP, Bansi MB, Rizwan MS. Clinical evaluation of primary stability and osseointegration of endosseous root form implants of different dimensions using periotest. Indian J Appl Res 2013;3:281-3.
  17. Simunek A, Kopecka D, Brazda T, Strnad I, Capek L, Slezak R. Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:619-27.
  18. Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:605-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x
  19. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  20. Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:881-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01692.x
  21. Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:253-60.
  22. Friberg B, Jisander S, Widmark G, Lundgren A, Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, et al. One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Branemark implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00186.x
  23. Miri R, Shirzadeh A, Kermani H, Khajavi A. Relationship and changes of primary and secondary stability in dental implants: a review. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2017;2017:03011.
  24. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Bilgin T. A 24-week prospective study comparing the stability of titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:684-8.
  25. Zhou W, Han C, Yunming L, Li D, Song Y, Zhao Y. Is the osseointegration of immediately and delayed loaded implants the same?: comparison of the implant stability during a 3-month healing period in a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1360-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01757.x
  26. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon's perception and objective measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:558-61.

Cited by

  1. Influence of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements for Successful Osseointegration of Dental Implants During the Healing Period and Its Impact on Implant Assessed by Osstell Mentor Device vol.7, pp.23, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.716
  2. Primary stability of narrow‐diameter dental implants with a multiple condensing thread design placed in bone with and without osteotomes: An in vitro study vol.22, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12908