The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea (암석학회지)

The Petrological Society of Korea (한국암석학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the Value and Distribution of Geological Heritages in Korea: Jeolla Province

한국의 지질유산 분포와 가치평가: 전라권

  • Cho, Hyeongseong (Department of Geology, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kang, Hee-Cheol (Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Sun (Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cheong, Daekyo (Department of Geology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Paik, In Sung (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lim, Hyoun Soo (Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Taejin (Department of Energy and Resource Engineering, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Joo (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Roh, Yul (Faculty of Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyu-Seong (Division of Science Education, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Huh, Min (Faculty of Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Seungwon (Geological Research Center, Geology Division, KIGAM)
  • 조형성 (경상대학교 지질과학과) ;
  • 강희철 (부산대학교 지질환경과학과) ;
  • 김종선 (부산대학교 지질환경과학과) ;
  • 정대교 (강원대학교 지질학과) ;
  • 백인성 (부경대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 임현수 (부산대학교 지질환경과학과) ;
  • 최태진 (조선대학교 에너지자원공학과) ;
  • 김현주 (부경대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 노열 (전남대학교 지구환경과학부) ;
  • 조규성 (전북대학교 과학교육학부) ;
  • 허민 (전남대학교 지구환경과학부) ;
  • 신승원 (한국지질자원연구원 지질연구센터)
  • Received : 2019.12.23
  • Accepted : 2019.12.27
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently planification and effort for management, assessment and discovery of geological heritagesare being increasingly demanded with institutional strategies such as geopark, as their preservation is asked socially. In this study, we discovered geological heritages in the Jeolla Province and then performed assessment of the value and grading of them and finally suggested a promising and suitable site for the National Geopark. A total of 325 geological heritages are listed on literature review and then detailed description in field and assessment of the value for selected 158 geoheritages are completed. The assessment items are categorized into intrinsic value, subsidiary value, and preservation/management part. The intrinsic value is subdivided into scientific/educational value, composed of representativeness, rarity, geodiversity, typicality, reproducibility, and particularity, and geomorphological/landscape value composed of scale, naturality (integrity), scenery (aesthetic value). Also, subsidiary value consist of 7 subsections of soil function, ecological function, tourism value, geological resource, historical value, folk tale or legend and symbolic value, and accessibility, convenient facility (infrastructure), management condition (legal protection) is evaluated in preservation/management part. The heritages in the Jeolla Province subdivided into three types: 73 geological heritages, 42 geomorphological heritages, and 42 composite heritages. Based on points acquired in intrinsic value, all geological heritages are graded Class-I to -V. As a result, numbers of geoheritage belong to Class-I (protection at world level), -II (protection at national level), -III (nationdesignated management), -IV (involved management list), -V (candidate management list) are 12, 39, 52, 34, 21, respectively. Finally, we construct database based on Arc-GIS with all informations for each geological heritage and suggest three promising and suitable sites, 'Jirisan-Seomjingang Area' and 'south coast area of Jeolla Province', for the National Geopark.

최근 지질유산의 보존에 대한 사회적 인식이 확산되고, 지질공원과 같은 다양한 제도적 장치가 마련됨에 따라, 지질유산의 발굴, 가치평가, 체계적인 보존 그리고 관리 및 활용을 위한 노력이 요구되고 있다. 이번 연구에서는 전라권을 대상으로 지질유산 발굴, 가치평가 및 등급화, DB 구축을 실시하였으며, 그 결과를 바탕으로 국가지질공원 유망 후보지를 제안하였다. 지질유산의 발굴은 문헌조사를 통해 총 325개의 지질유산 조사대상 목록을 작성하고, 이들 중 지질학적 가치가 높은 158개를 선정하여 상세한 야외조사와 가치평가를 실시하였다. 각 지질유산의 가치평가는 본질적 가치, 부수적 가치, 보존 및 관리의 세 항목으로 구분하여 실시하였다. 본질적 가치는 다시 학술 및 교육적 가치(대표성, 희소성, 다양성, 전형성, 재현성, 특이성)와 지형 및 경관적 가치(규모, 자연성, 심미성)로, 부수적 가치는 기능적 가치, 경제적 가치 그리고 역사 및 문화적 가치로 각각 세분하여 평가하였다. 보존 및 관리분야는 접근성, 편의 및 방호시설, 관리현황 항목에 대해 평가하였다. 지질유산의 관리등급은 본질적 가치의 점수를 기준으로 5단계로 구분하였다. 발굴된 지질유산을 유형별로 살펴보면, 지질학적 특징을 가진 유산이 73개, 지형학적 특징을 가진 유산이 42개, 양쪽 모두를 가진 복합유산이 42개가 발굴되었다. 전라권 지질유산들의 가치평가 및 등급화 결과, 세계급 보호대상인 I 등급은 12개, 국가급 보호대상인 II 등급은 39개, 국가지정 관리대상인 III 등급은 52개, 관리목록 등록대상인 IV 등급은 34개, 마지막으로 목록 작성대상인 V 등급은 21개로 각각 나타났다. 이상의 지질유산 상세 기재와 가치평가 및 등급화 결과들은 Arc-GIS를 기반으로 한 DB로 구축하였으며, 지질유산의 등급과 분포를 바탕으로 '지리산 및 섬진강 유역권(구례, 광양, 남원)'과 '전남 남해안권(해남, 진도, 고흥, 보성)'의 두 곳을 지질공원 유망후보지로 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brocx, M. and Semeniuk, V., 2007, Geoheritage and geoconservation - history, definition, scope and scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90, 53-87.
  2. Bruschi, V.M., Cendrero, A., and Albertos, J.A.C., 2011, A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage, 3, 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9
  3. Chae, Y.-U., Ha, S., Kim, C.-B., Kim, K.S., and Lim, H.S., 2019, Zircon U-Pb ages of Duwon Formation and Goheung Tuff in Goheung area, southern Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 55, 583-594 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.5.583
  4. Cheong, C. and Kim, N., 2012, Review of radiometric ages for Phanerozoic granitoids in southern Korean Peninsula. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea, 21, 173-192 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7854/JPSK.2012.21.2.173
  5. Cho, H., Kang, H.-C., Shin, S., Cheong, D., Paik, I.S., Lim, H.S., Shin, D., Kim, H.J., Lee, C.H., and Kim, J.-S., 2016, Assessment of the value and distribution of geological heritages in Chungcheong Province, Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 52, 639-664 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2016.52.5.639
  6. Cho, H., Kang, K., Cheon, Y., Son, M., and Kim, J.-S., 2014. Geoheritage values of the geological outcrops distributed in the Dusong Peninsular geosite of the Busan National Geopark, Korea. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea, 23, 153-162 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7854/JPSK.2014.23.2.153
  7. Chun, S.C. and Kim, S.B., 1995, The Cretaceous Kyokpori Formation, SW Korea: sublacustrine steep-sloped delta facies. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 31, 215-236.
  8. Dixon, G., 1996, Geoconservation: an international review and strategy for Tasmania. Parks & Wildlife Service, Tasmania, 101 p.
  9. Fassoulas, C., Mouriki, D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis, P. and Iliopoulos, G., 2012, Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage, 4, 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9
  10. KIGAM, 1995, Geological map of Korea (1:1,000,000). Korea Institute of Geology, Mining and Materials.
  11. KIGAM, 2001, Tectonic map of Korea (1:1,000,000). Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources.
  12. Kim, S.B., Chough, S.K., and Chun, S.S., 1995, Bouldery deposits in the lowermost part of the Cretaceous Kyokpori Formation, SW Korea; Cohesionless debris flows and debris falls on a steep-gradient delta slope. Sedimentary Geology, 98, 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(95)00029-8
  13. Kim, Y.P. and Im, E.S., 2004, Restructuring mountain systems in Korean peninsula: Focusing on mountain range analysis. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 208 p (in Korean).
  14. Koh, H.J., Kwon, C.W., Park, S.I., Park, J., and Kee, W.-S., 2013, Geological Report of the Julpo and Wido.Hawangdeungdo sheets (1:50,000). Korea Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, 81 p (in Korean with English abstract).
  15. Kwon, C.W., Ko, K., and Koh, H.J., 2015, Geological Report of the Beopseongpo.Anmado.Songido.Bunamgundo.Imjado sheets (1:50,000). Korea Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, 57 p (in Korean with English abstract).
  16. Lee, C.-H., Lee, S.-W., Ock, S.-S., and Song, Y.-S., 2001, Petrology of the blastoprophyritic granite gneiss in the southwestern part of the Sobaegsan Massif. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 22, 528-547 (in Korean with English abstract).
  17. Lee, D.W., 1999, Strike-slip fault tectonics and basin formation during the Cretaceous in the Korean Peninsula. The Island Arc, 8, 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1738.1999.00233.x
  18. Lee, S., 2015, Evaluation of geological heritage and its utilization. Annual Conference of the Geological Society of Korea (Abstracts), Jeju, October 28-31, 203 p (in Korean).
  19. Lee, S., Cho, H., Kang, K., and Son, M., 2016, How to Assess the value of geological heritage? Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 52, 5, 539-560 (in Korean with English abstract).
  20. Lee, S.-J., Kim, J.Y., Lee, Y.J., Sagong, H., and Lee, E.J., 2008, Geological heritage and management in Korea. Korea Environment Institute, 387 p (in Korean with English abstract).
  21. Lee, Y.-U. and Song, J.-H., 2007, The stratigraphy and the depositional environments of the Cretaceous Gurye Basin, Jeollanamdo, Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 43, 265-279 (in Korean with English abstract).
  22. Mampel, L., Cobos, A., Alcall, L., Alcala, L., Luque, L., and Royo-Torres, R., 2009, An integreted system of heritage management applied to dinosaur sites in Teruel (Aragon, Spain). Geoheritage, 1, 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-009-0005-x
  23. Paik, I.S., Kim, S.K., Huh, M., Lee, S.J., Kim, H.J., and Lim, J.D., 2010, Touristic aspects of geological heritagesCretaceous dinosaur fossil sites-. Annual Review in Cultural Heritage Studies, 43, 4-27 (in Korean with English abstract).
  24. Park, J. and Cheong, D., 2012, A quantitative evaluation model for geoheritage. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 48, 163-178 (in Korean with English abstract).
  25. Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L., and Scapozza, C., 2007, A method for assessing 'scientific' and 'additional values' of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-148-2007
  26. Rybar, P., 2010, Assessment of attractivenss (value) of geotouristic objects. Acta Geoturistica, 1, 13-21.
  27. Sagong, H. and Lee, S.-J., 2014, A Measure on the Conservation of Geological Heritages: Geological Survey and Evaluation Forms for Geologic Outcrops. The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea, 23, 145-152 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7854/JPSK.2014.23.2.145
  28. Shin, S., Lim, H.S., Kang, H.-C., Kim, J.-S., Shin, S., Kim, H.J., Cheong, D., Paik, I.S., Hwang, S.K., Huh, M., and Cho, H., 2018, Assessment of the value and distribution of geological heritages in Gyeongbuk Province, Korea. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 54, 133-151 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2018.54.2.133
  29. Sohn, Y.K., 2014, Geoheritage in Korea and its conservation, utilization and management plans. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 50, 1-2 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2014.50.1.1
  30. Strba, L., Rybar, P., Balaz, B., Molokac, M., Hvizdak, L., Krsak, B., Lukac, M., Muchova, L., Tometzova, D., and Ferencikova, J., 2015, Geosite assessments: comparison of methods and results. Current Issues in Tourism, 18, 496-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.882885
  31. Turek, A. and Kim, C.-B.,, 1995, U-Pb zircon ages of Mesozoic plutons in the Damyang-Gochang area, Ryeongnam massif, Korea. Geochemical Journal, 29, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.29.243
  32. Warszynska, J., 1970, Evaluation of the village in terms of the tourism attractiveness. Prace Geograficzne, 17, 103-114.
  33. Wimbledon, W.A.P., Ishchenko, A.A., Gerasimenko, N.P., Karis, L.O., Suominen, V., Ohansson, C.E., and Freden, C., 2000, Geosites-an IUGS initiative: Science supported by conservation. In: Barettino, D., Wimbledon, W.A.P. and Gallego, E. (eds.), Geological heritage: its conservation and management. IGME, Spain, 69-94.