DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Decade of Comparative Study on the Changes in Elementary and Secondary School Science Teachers' Professionalism and Perceptions of Integrated Science Education

초·중등 과학교사들의 통합과학교육에 대한 인식과 교사 전문성에 관한 10년 주기(2008-2018) 비교 연구

  • Received : 2019.09.17
  • Accepted : 2019.12.30
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The cultivation of creative convergence talent has become more important than ever, the Korean curriculum has also undergone many changes, aiming for convergence and integrated education. In addition to these changes in science and curriculum, we examined the changes in perception and Professionalism(PCK) of integrated science education of science teachers over the past decade. For this study, 359 elementary and secondary science teachers in 2008, when the 2007 revised curriculum was applied, and 360 elementary and secondary science teachers in 2018, when the 2015 revised curriculum was applied, were examined for 10 years of changes in perceptions and PCK of integrated science education. The conclusions from the analysis were as follows. First, in 2018, elementary and secondary science teachers were found to have a statistically significant increase in awareness of integrated science education. Nevertheless, cognition was found to be 'normal'. Second, teachers' perception of the necessity of improving the professionalism of teachers, providing teaching and learning materials, reducing the contents of learning, reducing the number of students and securing flexible timetables, and raising the perception of integrated science education for students and parents as a condition for the success of integrated science education, was analyzed to be significantly higher in 2018. Third, the results of PCK survey through self-diagnosis, teachers' PCK on integrated science education, such as competence to secure curriculum contents knowledge, comprehension of curriculum and class composition related to integrated science education, teaching strategy for integrated, creation of teaching and learning environment for integrated teaching, efforts to improve administrative constraints and the professionalism of integrated science education, was significantly higher than it was ten years ago. Therefore, the recent emphasis on convergence education has increased the experience of applying convergence classes in the field of education, and it was seen as a result of the continuous efforts of science teachers to meet the changes in the education paradigm.

창의융합 인재 양성의 중요성으로 우리나라 교육과정도 융합과 통합교육을 지향하며 많은 변화가 있었다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 과학과 교육과정의 변화와 더불어 최근 10년간 과학교사들의 통합과학 교육에 대한 인식과 전문성이 어떤 변화가 있는지 알아보았다. 이를 위해 서울과 경기도 소재의 2007 개정 교육과정이 적용되고 있었던 2008년도의 초·중등 과학교사 359명과 2015 개정 교육과정이 적용되고 있었던 2018년도의 초·중등 과학교사 360명을 대상으로 통합과학교육에 대한 인식과 전문성(PCK)에 대하여 10년간의 변화를 살펴보았으며, 분석 결과에 따른 결론은 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 2018년 초·중등 과학교사들은 통합과학교육에 대한 인지가 통계적으로 유의미하게 높아졌음에도 불구하고 '보통' 정도인 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 통합과학교육의 성공적인 안착을 위해 교사의 전문성 향상, 교수학습 자료의 제공, 학습내용의 축소, 학생 수 감소와 시간표의 융통성 확보, 학생과 학부모의 통합과학교육에 대한 인식 확대의 필요에 대한 인식도 유의미하게 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 자기진단에 의한 PCK 조사 결과, 교과 내용 지식 확보 능력, 통합과학교육과 관련된 교육과정의 이해와 수업 구성 능력, 통합적 교수 전략 능력, 통합적 수업을 위한 교수학습 환경 조성 능력, 통합과학교육의 전문성 향상을 위한 노력 등 통합과학교육에 대한 교사들의 PCK는 10년 전에 비해 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 최근 융복합 교육의 강조로 현장에서 융복합 수업의 적용 경험이 많아졌으며, 교육 패러다임의 변화에 부합하고자 하는 과학교사들의 지속적인 노력의 결실로 보여졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  2. Fogarty, R., & Stoehr, J. (1995). Integrating curricula with multiple intelligences: Teams, themes and threads. CA: Corwin Press.
  3. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  4. Kim, J. (2011). A Cubic Model for STEAM Education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 124-139.
  5. Kim, Y. (2000). The state of the Art of Common Science Teaching in High School. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 200-213.
  6. KOFAC (2018). Report on 2017 teacher training achievement of Integrated Science. Seoul: KOFAC.
  7. Kwak, Y. (2019). Exploration of Support Plans for 2015 Integrated Science Curriculum through the Performance Evaluation of Implemented Teacher Training Programs. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.2.197
  8. Kwak, Y., Lee, J., Lee, Y. (2017). Ways to Improve In-Service Science Teachers' Expertise with the Introduction of 'Integrated Science' in the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 363-371.
  9. Lee, G., & Hong, H. (2017a). Analysis on the Meaning Change of the Term 'Core Concept' in the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 1-30.
  10. Lee, G., & Hong, H. (2017b). A Comparison of Integrated Science and Converged Science of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum through Core Concepts, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 981-992. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.6.981
  11. Lee, H. (1986). Survey on the Realities of Integrated Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 6(2), 43-52.
  12. Lee, H., Kim, S., No, G., Son, Y. (1996). Research Articles : A Status on the Preservice Education for the Training of Integrated Science Teachers in the Departments of Science Education. BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 24(1), 9-24.
  13. Lee, K., Beak, K., & Lee, S. (2017). Key Competencies in the Revised Curriculum: The Relationship with the Idea of the Educated Person, Educational Goals, and Subject Competencies. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 67-94.
  14. Lee, K., On, J., & Paik, N., (2014). Exploration of curriculum content composition and achievement criteria statement methods. Koera Society for Curriculum Studies. The 2nd National Curriculum Experts' Forum Proceeding (pp. 31-78).
  15. Lee, Y., & Son, Y. (2010). A Case Study of Multidisciplinary Integrated Science Lesson by Beginning Teacher and Experienced Teacher in Elementary Schools. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 29(4), 552-566.
  16. Maeng, H. (2018). Literature and Science Core Issues of Integrated Curriculum and Major Characteristics of Introducing 'Integrated Science' in 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 2018 Conference Proceeding, 22, 71-88.
  17. Maeng, H., & Son, Y. (2011). An analysis of the differences in perceptions and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) of elementary teachers depend on application experience of integrated science education in the elementary science class. Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 601-614.
  18. Maeng, H., & Son, Y. (2012). A Diagnosis of PCK and an Analysis of the Current Status of the Elementary and Middle School Science Teacher's Integrated Science Education Application for Integrated Science Instruction Consulting. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 16(2), 539-563. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.2.539
  19. MEST (2009). Manual for Science Curriculum(MEST Notification No. 2009-41).
  20. Mitchner, C. P., Anderson, R. D.(1989). Teacher' perspective: Developing and Implementing an STS curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260407
  21. MOE (1992a). Middle School Science Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 1992-11.
  22. MOE (1992b). High School Science Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 1992-19.
  23. MOE (1997). Science Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 1997-15.
  24. MOE (2015a). Science Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 2015-74 [supplement 9].
  25. MOE (2015b). Overview of Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 2015-80.
  26. MOEHRD (2007). Elementary School Curriculum. MOEHRD Notification No. 2007-79[supplement 2].
  27. Shin, Y., & Choi, B. (2012). A Survey on the Management Status and Science Teachers' Perception of Science in High School Based on 2009 Curriculum Revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(10), 1599-1612.
  28. Son, Y., Lee, H. (1999). A Theoretical Study to Formulate the Direction of Integrated Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,19(1), 41-61.
  29. Song, J., Kang, N., Kwak, Y., Na, J., Bang, D., Son, Y., Son, J., Shim, K., Lee, B., Jeon, H., & Choi, I. (2014). Research on Restructuring Science Curriculum Integrating Liberal Arts and Natural Science Track. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  30. Song, J., Na, J. (2015). Directions and Issues of 2015 National Science Curriculum and their Implications to Science Classroom Culture. School Science Journal, 9(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.9.2.201507.72
  31. Sung, K., Park, G., & Lim, Y. (2001). A Study on Problems and Propositions of Departmental System in Elementary School. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 13(1), 315-351.
  32. Yang, C., Kwak, Y., Han, J., & Noh, T. (2013). Current status of teacher education curriculum and recruitment of general science teachers and ways to improve them as suggested by professors from the department of science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.345

Cited by

  1. Exploring the Research Trend Changes on Convergence Education of Before and After 2011 in Science Education vol.40, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.5.531
  2. 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253