Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influences of Integrated Science and Science Inquiry Experiment Developed Under the 2015 Revised National Curriculum on Students' Interest in Science, Scientific Attitude, Views on Science-Technology-Society Relationship, and Views on Nature of Science

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 통합과학과 과학탐구실험이 학생들의 과학에 대한 흥미, 과학적 태도, STS와 과학의 본성에 대한 견해에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2019.11.26
  • Accepted : 2019.12.31
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the influences of Integrated Science and Science Inquiry Experiment developed under 2015 Revised National Science Curriculum on students' interest in science, scientific attitude, views on STS, and the nature of science (NOS). 223 tenth graders in Seoul metropolitan area participated in this study. We conducted the survey prior to and after the Integrated Science and Science Inquiry Experiment course using same instruments and compared the results of the pre-test and post-test. The analyses of the results reveal that there were significant improvements in the scores of the pre- and post-test on the interest in science and scientific attitude. In the case of views on STS, there were significant improvements in items related to science research ethics, however there were no significant differences in the remaining items. Also, there were no significant differences in the scores of the pre- and post-test on views on NOS. On the bases of the results, we discuss educational implications and suggest further studies.

이 연구에서는 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 의한 통합과학과 과학탐구실험이 학생들의 과학에 대한 흥미, 과학적 태도, STS와 NOS에 대한 견해에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 수도권 소재의 고등학교에 재학 중인 1학년 학생 223명이 연구에 참여하였으며, 통합과학과 과학탐구실험의 이수 전후에 각각 검사를 실시하고 두 검사의 결과를 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 과학에 대한 흥미 점수와 과학적 태도 점수는 이수 전후에 유의미하게 향상되었다. STS에 대한 견해의 점수를 분석한 결과, 연구 윤리에 관한 항목의 견해는 이수 후에 유의미하게 향상되었으나 나머지 항목에서는 유의미한 차이가 없었다. NOS에 대한 견해의 점수는 모든 영역에서 이수 전후에 유의미한 차이가 없었다. 이에 대한 교육적 함의를 논의하였고, 후속 연구를 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
  3. Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Flemming, R. W. (1989). Views on science-technology-society (from CDN. mc. 5). Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan.
  4. Celik, S., & Bayrakceken, S. (2006). The effect of a 'Science, Technology and Society' course on prospective teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811692
  5. Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20147
  6. Cho, J.-I., & Ju, D.-G. (1996). A study on Korean science teachers' point of view on nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(2), 200-209.
  7. Dass, P. M. (2005). Understanding the nature of scientific enterprise (NOSE) through a discourse with its history: The influence of an undergraduate 'history of science' course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 87-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3225-1
  8. Eoum, H.-S., & Moon, S.-B. (2014). An examination on teachers' and students' perception of converged science introduced by the 2009 revised high school curriculum as well as its actual implementation. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2014.7.2.203
  9. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620411
  10. Han, J.-S., & Chung, Y.-L. (1997). Teachers' and students' understanding of the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 17(2), 119-125.
  11. Jho, H. (2018). An analysis of elements of scientific inquiry presented in 2015 revised national science curriculum: Focusing on scientific inquiry experiment. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 22(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2018.22.3.208
  12. Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
  13. Kim, H., & Ahn, Y. (2019). Perception of science teachers on Integrated Science practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.2.187
  14. Kim, H., Lee, T., & Bang, K. (2015). Comparative analysis of reflection order in Integrated Science textbooks and students' perception for science core competencies. School Science Journal, 13(1), 36-77.
  15. Kim, H.-K., & Jung, E. (2018). How to apply 2015 national science curriculum at the general high school. The Journal of Curriculum an Evaluation, 21(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.22799/JCE.2018.21.1.003
  16. Kim, H.-K., & Na, J. (2018). A study on high school teachers' perception on the field application of 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 565-588. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.10.565
  17. Kim, S. Y. (2010). Exploring preservice science teachers' views of nature of science: biology vs. non-biology teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 206-271. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.2.206
  18. Korea Foundation of Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC] (2015). Development research of draft of 2015 revised subject curriculum II - Science curriculum. (Research Report BD15110002). Seoul: KOFAC.
  19. Korea Foundation of Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC] (2019). Study on the monitoring and implementation of the 2015 science national curriculum. (Research Report BD19030006). Seoul: KOFAC.
  20. Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
  21. Kwak, Y., Kim, C.-J., Lee, Y.-R., & Jeong, D.-S. (2006). Investigation on elementary and secondary students' interest in science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268.
  22. Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301-317). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  23. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
  24. Lee, J. S., Kim, E. J., & Kim, D. H. (2017). Relationship between key competences and subject competences, and subject competences and achievement standards in revised national common basic curriculum of science in 2015. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 8(4), 11(2), 1-25.
  25. Lee, J.-K., Lee, C. Y., Park, C., Chin, S.-Y., Jeon, Y. E., & Hong H.-G. (2018). Analysis of the 'Integrated Science' and 'Science Inquiry Experiments' achievement standards of the 2015 revised science curriculum from the practices. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(14), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.227
  26. Lee, K. W., Jeung, Y. K., Seo, Y. J., Jeong, C. W., Choi, J. S., Park, M. H., ... Kim, S. H. (2014). Research on subject curriculum development strategy(KICE Research Paper CRC 2014-7). Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  27. Lim, S.-M., Cheong W.-Y., & Yang, I.-H. (2010). Elementary science-gifted teachers' views and attitudes toward teaching on nature of science. Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2010.34.2.396
  28. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  29. Nam, J., Mayer, V. J., Choi, J., & Lim, J. (2007). Pre-service science teachers' understanding of nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(3), 253-262.
  30. Noh, T. & Kang, S. (1997). The effect of the 'General Science' course on the students' views about science-technology-society relationship and their perceptions of science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 17(4), 395-403.
  31. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
  32. Rhee, H. (2016). Educational shift of science and technology ethics in the national science curriculum of Korea from the 7th in 1997 to the 2015 curriculum revision. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(11), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.11.683
  33. Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the Views on Science-Technology-Society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180401
  34. Shin, Y.-O., & Choi, B.-S. (2012). A survey on the management status and science teachers' perception of science in high school based on 2009 curriculum revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(10), 1599-1612. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.10.1599
  35. Shin, Y., & Kwak, Y. (2019). Analysis of realities of organization and implementation of Integrated Science of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.1.64
  36. Song, S.-C., & Shim, K.-C. (2018). Analysis of inquiry activity types in the Integrated Science textbooks for high school students. Biology Education, 46(2), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.24
  37. Yang, C., Kim, M., & Noh, T. (2015). The influences of integrated science developed under the 2009 revised national curriculum on students' views on nature of science and science-technology-society relationship, interest in science, and science aspiration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0549
  38. Yang, S. (2019). Analysis of representations of nature of science and categorization of reflective activities in 'Scientific Inquiry and Experimentation' textbooks: Focusing on 'Scientific Inquiry in the History' chapter. (Masters dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
  39. Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2016). The analysis of high school science teachers' expectations and concerns on the Integrated Science and Science Inquiry Experiment subjects in 2015 revised national curriculum, 16(5), 515-546.

Cited by

  1. 탐구적 과학 글쓰기를 적용한 과학 수업의 효과에 대한 중학교 과학 영재들의 인식 vol.64, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.5.277
  2. 2015 개정 교육과정 '과학탐구실험' 평가 도구 및 평가 현황 탐색 vol.40, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.5.515
  3. 과학사 과목의 전통 천문의기 학습을 위해 필요한 학습 요소 및 관련 성취기준 위계성 분석 vol.40, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.6.649