DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage Detection in Truss Structures Using Deep Learning Techniques

딥러닝 기술을 이용한 트러스 구조물의 손상 탐지

  • Lee, Seunghye (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Kihak (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Jaehong (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University)
  • Received : 2018.11.20
  • Accepted : 2018.12.05
  • Published : 2019.03.15

Abstract

There has been considerable recent interest in deep learning techniques for structural analysis and design. However, despite newer algorithms and more precise methods have been developed in the field of computer science, the recent effective deep learning techniques have not been applied to the damage detection topics. In this study, we have explored the structural damage detection method of truss structures using the state-of-the-art deep learning techniques. The deep neural networks are used to train knowledge of the patterns in the response of the undamaged and the damaged structures. A 31-bar planar truss are considered to show the capabilities of the deep learning techniques for identifying the single or multiple-structural damage. The frequency responses and the elasticity moduli of individual elements are used as input and output datasets, respectively. In all considered cases, the neural network can assess damage conditions with very good accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Achenbach, J. D., "Structural health monitoring - What is the prescription?", Mechanics Research Communications, Vol.36, No.2, pp.137-142, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.08.011
  2. Aktan, A. E., Catbas, F. N., Grimmelsman, K. A., & Tsikos, C. J., "Issues in Infrastructure Health Monitoring for Management", Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol.126, No.7, pp.771-724, 2000
  3. Shon, H., Farrar, C. R., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D. D., Stinemates, D. W., Nadler, B. R., & Czarnecki, J. J. (2004). A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996-2001(Report No. LA-13076-MS) USA: Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. Lee, S. H., & Lee, J. H., "Damage Detection in Truss Structures using Anti-Optimization", Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, Vol.25, No.4, pp.441-449, 2013 https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2013.25.4.441
  5. Rosenblatt, F., "The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain", Psychological Review, Vol.65, No.6, pp.386-408, 1958 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519
  6. Paz, M., "Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation", 3rd ed., Springer Science & Business Media, pp.3-628, 2012.
  7. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W., "A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity", The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, Vol.5, No.4, pp.115-133, 1943 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
  8. Rumelhart, D. W., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J., "Learning representations by back-propagating errors", Nature, Vol.323, No.6088, pp.533-536, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
  9. Tieleman, T., & Hinton, G., "Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the Gradient by a Running Average of Its Recent Magnitude. COURSERA: Neural Networks for Machine Learning", University of Toronto, Vol.4, pp.26-31, 2012
  10. Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R., "Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors", arXiv: 1207.0580 [cs.NE], 2012
  11. Karsoliya, S., "Approximating Number of Hidden layer neurons in Multiple Hidden Layer BPNN Architecture", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, Vol.3, No.6, pp.714-717, 2012
  12. Zeiler, M. D., "ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method", arXiv:1212.5701 [cs.LG], 2012