DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Techno-Economic Analysis of Reversible Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Couple with Waste Steam

폐스팀을 이용한 가역 고체산화물 연료전지의 기술적 경제적 해석

  • GIAP, VAN-TIEN (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST)) ;
  • LEE, YOUNG DUK (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST)) ;
  • KIM, YOUNG SANG (Department of Clean Fuel & Power Generation, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM)) ;
  • AHN, KOOK YOUNG (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST))
  • 잡반티엔 (과학기술연합대학원대학교 환경에너지기계공학) ;
  • 이영덕 (과학기술연합대학원대학교 환경에너지기계공학) ;
  • 김영상 (한국기계연구원 청정연료발전연구실) ;
  • 안국영 (과학기술연합대학원대학교 환경에너지기계공학)
  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.02.28
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

Reversible solid oxide fuel cell (ReSOC) system was integrated with waste steam for electrical energy storage in distributed energy storage application. Waste steam was utilized as external heat in SOEC mode for higher hydrogen production efficiency. Three system configurations were analyzed to evaluate techno-economic performance. The first system is a simple configuration to minimize the cost of balance of plant. The second system is the more complicated configuration with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The third system is featured with HRSG and fuel recirculation by blower. Lumped models were used for system performance analyses. The ReSOC stack was characterized by applying area specific resistance value at fixed operating pressure and temperature. In economical assessment, the levelized costs of energy storage (LCOS) were calculated for three system configurations based on capital investment. The system lifetime was assumed 20 years with ReSOC stack replaced every 5 years, inflation rate of 2%, and capacity factor of 80%. The results showed that the exergy round-trip efficiency of system 1, 2, 3 were 47.9%, 48.8%, and 52.8% respectively. The high round-trip efficiency of third system compared to others is attributed to the remarkable reduction in steam requirement and hydrogen compression power owning to fuel recirculation. The result from economic calculation showed that the LCOS values of system 1, 2, 3 were 3.46 ¢/kWh, 3.43 ¢/kWh, and 3.14 ¢/kWh, respectively. Even though the systems 2 and 3 have expensive HRSG, they showed higher round-trip efficiencies and significant reduction in boiler and hydrogen compressor cost.

Keywords

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Schematics of SOEC mode couple with waste steam – system 1

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Schematics of SOFC mode couple with waste steam – all systems

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Schematics of SOEC mode couple with waste steam – system 2

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Schematics of SOEC mode couple with waste steam – system 3

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Round-trip efficiencies of three defined systems at de-sign point

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Levelized cost of storage of three system configurations

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Cost of component in 2017 in three system configurations

Table 1. System specification and variables

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Purchased equipment cost7-14)

SSONB2_2019_v30n1_21_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. S. H. Jensen, P. H. Larsen, and M. Mogensen, "Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production from renewable energy sources", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32, No. 15, 2007, pp. 3253-3257, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.042.
  2. D. R. Morris and J. Szargut, "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth", Energy, Vol. 11, No. 8, 1986, pp. 733-755, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(86)90013-7.
  3. M. Boles and Y. Cengel, "Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach", 8th ed, McGraw-Hill Education, USA, 2014.
  4. P. Perrot, "A to Z of thermodynamics Oxford", Oxford University Press, USA, 1998.
  5. E. Querol, B. Gonzalez-Regueral, J. L. Perez-Benedito, "Practical Approach to Exergy and Thermoeconomic Analyses of Industrial Processes", Springer London, UK, 2013, pp. 9-28. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/kr/book/9781447146216.
  6. Magazine CE, "Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index", 2017. Retrieved from https://www.chemengonline.com.
  7. C. H. Wendel, "Design and analysis of reversible solid oxide cell systems for electrical energy storage", Colorado School of Mines, USA, 2015. Retrieved from https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/11124/17130/Wendel_mines_0052E_10723.pdf?sequence=1.
  8. J. Thijssen, "The impactof scale-up and production volume on sofc manufacturing cost. Technical report", National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA, 2007. Retrieved from https://www.netl.doe.gov/file%20library/events/2006/seca/Thijssen.pdf.
  9. S. H. Jensen, C. Graves, M. Mogensen, C. Wendel, R. Braun, G. Hughes, Z. Gao, S. A. Barnett, "Large-scale electricity storage utilizing reversible solid oxide cells combined with underground storage of $CO_2$ and $CH_4$", Energy Environ Sci., Vol. 8, No. 8, 2015, pp. 2471-2479, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5ee01485a.
  10. US Consumer Price Index, "Inflationdata.com", 2014. Retrieved from https://inflationdata.com.
  11. R. F. Boehm, "Design analysis of thermal systems", Wiley New York, USA, 1987.
  12. A. Bejan and G. Tsatsaronis, "Thermal design and optimization", John Wiley & Sons, Canada, 1996.
  13. M. S. Peters and K. D. Timmerhaus, Max S Peters, "Plant design and economics for chemical engineers", McGraw-Hill, Inc, USA, 1991. Retrieved from https://www.dioneoil.com/uploads/6/8/7/4/6874938/plant_design_and_economics_for_chemical_engineers.pdf.
  14. M. C. Woods, P. J. Capicotto, J. L. Haslbeck, N. J. Kuehn, M. Matuszewski, L. L. Pinkerton, M. D. Rutkowski, R. L. Schoff, and V. Vaysman, "Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants", US Department of Energy, USA, 2007.