DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance of Urea-Formaldehyde Resins Synthesized at Two Different Low Molar Ratios with Different Numbers of Urea Addition

  • Jeong, Bora (Department of Wood and Paper Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Byung-Dae (Department of Wood and Paper Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2019.02.06
  • Accepted : 2019.03.06
  • Published : 2019.03.25

Abstract

This study reports the performance of urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins prepared at two different low formaldehyde/urea (F/U) mole ratios with different numbers of urea addition during synthesis. The second or third urea was added during the synthesis of UF resins to obtain two different low molar ratios of 0.7 and 1.0, respectively. The molecular weights, cure kinetics, and adhesion performance of these resins were characterized by the gel permeation chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, and tensile shear strength of plywood, respectively. When the number of urea additions and F/U molar ratio increased, the gelation time decreased, whereas the viscosity and molecular weight increased. Further, the UF resins prepared with the second urea and 1.0 molar ratio resulted in greater activation energy than those with third urea and 0.7 molar ratio. Tensile shear strength and formaldehyde emission (FE) of the plywood that bonded with these resins increased when the number of urea additions and molar ratio increased. These results suggest that the UF resins prepared with 0.7 molar ratio and third urea addition provide lower adhesion performance and FE than those resins with 1.0 mole ratio and the second urea addition.

Keywords

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. GPC chromatograms of UF resins prepared at different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Peak areas per the total peak area of UF resins synthesized at different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios. Four bars per each group at the retention time are corresponding to the Peak 4, 3, 2, and 1 as shown in Fig. 1.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Mn, Mw, and PDI of UF resins at different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Changes of Ea values of UF resins at different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Change in Eα values of UF resins as a function of α with different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Tensile shear strength of plywood bonded with UF resins synthesized with different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios.

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Formaldehyde emission of plywood bonded with UF resins prepared with at different addition of urea.

Table 1. Properties of UF resins synthesized at different numbers of urea addition and F/U mole ratios

HMJGBP_2019_v47n2_221_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. de Jong, J.I., de Jonge, J. 1952. The reaction of urea with formaldehyde. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas 71: 643-661 https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19520710704
  2. de Jong, J.I., de Jonge, J., Eden, H.A.K. 1953. The formation of trihydroxymethyl urea. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas 72: 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19530720111
  3. Gu, J.Y., Higuchi, M., Morita, M., Hse, C.Y. 1995. Synthetic conditions and chemical structures of urea-formaldehyde resins. 1. Properties of the resins synthesized by three different procedures. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 41(12): 1115-1121.
  4. Hse, C.-Y., Xia, Z.-Y., Tomita, B. 1994. Effects of reaction pH on properties and performance of ureaformaldehyde resins. Holzforschung 48: 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.6.527
  5. Jeong, B., Park, B.D. 2017. Effect of analytical parameters of gel permeation chromatography on molecular weight measurements of urea-formaldehyde resins. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 45(4): 471-481. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2017.45.4.471
  6. KS F 3101, 2016. Ordinary plywood, Korea Standard Association, Seoul, Korea.
  7. KS M 1998-4, 2005. Determination of the formaldehyde emission of building products-Pat 4. Desiccator method, Korean Standard Association, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Meyer, B., Johns, W.E., Woo, J.K. 1980. Formaldehyde release from sulfur-modified urea-formaldehyde resin systems. Forest Products Journal 30(3): 24-31.
  9. Meyer, B. 1986. Formaldehyde release from wood products; Andrew, B.K. and Reinhardt, R.M. eds.; American Chemical Society. Washington, DC.
  10. Myer, B. 1979. Urea-Formaldehyde Resins; Addison-Wesley: London.
  11. Myers, G.E. 1983. Formaldehyde emission from particleboard and plywood paneling: measurement, mechanism, and product standards. Forest Products Journal 33(5): 27-37.
  12. Myers, G.E. 1984. How mole ratio of UF resin affects formaldehyde emission and other properties: a literature critique. Forest Products Journal 34(5): 35-41.
  13. Myers, G.E., Koutsky, J.A. 1987. Procedure for Measuring Formaldehyde Liberation from Formaldehydebased Resins. Forest Products Journal 37(9): 56-60.
  14. Park, B.D., Kang, E.C., Park, J.Y. 2006. Effects of formaldehyde to urea mole ratio on thermal curing behavior of urea-formaldehyde resin and properties of particleboard. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 101(3): 1787-1792. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23538
  15. Park, B.D., Kim, J.W. 2008. Dynamic mechanical analysis of urea-formaldehyde resin adhesives with different formaldehyde-to-urea molar ratios. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 108: 2045-2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.27595
  16. Park, B.D., Causin, V. 2013. Crystallinity and domain size of cured urea-formaldehyde resin adhesives with different formaldehyde/urea mole ratios. European Polymer Journal 49(2): 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.029
  17. Park, B.D., S.M. Lee, 2015. Hydrolytic Stability of Cured Urea-Melamine-Formaldehyde Resins Depending on Hydrolysis Conditions and Hardener Types Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 43(5): 672-681. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.5.672
  18. Park, B.D., Kang, E.C., Lee, S.M., Park, J.Y. 2016. Formaldehyde emission of wood-based composite panels with different surface lamination materials using desiccator method, Journal of Korean Wood Science and Technology 44(4): 600-606. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.4.600
  19. Pizzi, A., Lipschitz, L., Valenzuela, J. 1994. Theory and practices of the preparation of low formaldehyde emission UF adhesives. Holzforschung 48: 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.3.254
  20. Roffael, E. 1975. Messung der formaldehydehydabgabe. Holz-zentralblatt 100(96): 1461-1462.
  21. Sundin, B., Hanetho, P. 1978. Formaldehyde emission from particleboard and other building materials: T.M. Maloey (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th international particleboard symposium, Pullman, WA, Washington State University pp. 251-286.
  22. Samarzija-Jovanovic, S., Jovanovic, V., Konstantinovic, S., Markovic, G. Marinovic-Cincovic, M. 2011. Thermal behavior of modified urea-formaldehyde resins. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 104(3): 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1143-8
  23. Vyazovkin, S. 2006. Model-free kinetics. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 83(1): 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-7044-6