DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Space Composition of University Libraries on User Satisfaction and Continuance Intention: Application of the Servicescape

서비스스케이프를 적용한 대학도서관의 공간구성이 이용자 만족도와 지속의도에 미치는 영향

  • 김환희 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.14
  • Accepted : 2019.03.27
  • Published : 2019.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply the Servicescape, which is used to measure the spatial services in marketing, to the studies on university libraries, in order to identify the influence of the library spaces and facilities on the satisfaction and continuance intention of the users of university libraries. For this purpose, questionnaires and in-depth interviews were conducted for users in ten private universities located in Seoul. Servicescape factors of the libraries showed that cleanliness, comfort, aesthetics, and convenience had a significant influence. Of these, convenience turned out to have the highest level of influence upon satisfaction, followed by cleanliness, aesthetics, and comfort. Descriptive statistical analysis showed whether there were significant differences in satisfaction and continuance intention based on the differences in the characteristics of the samples. Findings show that it would be necessary to provide spaces that can accommodate the various functions of a university library; seek advancement of the services; and develop the spaces of a library in consideration of cleanliness, comfort, aesthetic, and convenience. This study introduced the concept of Servicescape for the first time in the field of library and information science. This study implies that the results assist a more detailed analysis for the Library as Place dimension of LibQUAL+, and provide a new guideline for practitioners who design library spaces.

본 연구는 마케팅 분야에서 공간 서비스를 측정하기 위해 이용되는 서비스스케이프를 대학도서관에 도입함으로써 도서관 공간 및 시설이 이용자들의 만족도와 지속의도에 미치는 영향을 확인하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울에 위치한 4년제 종합사립대학교 10곳의 이용자를 대상으로 설문과 심층면담을 실시하였다. 분석결과 도서관의 서비스스케이프 요인은 청결성, 쾌적성, 심미성, 편의성으로 확인되었으며 편의성을 필두로 청결성, 심미성, 쾌적성 순으로 이용자의 만족도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 이용자의 특성에 따라 대학도서관 서비스스케이프의 만족도와 지속의도에도 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 대학도서관은 더 다양한 기능을 수용할 수 있는 공간 마련과 선진 정보 기술 활용 등을 통한 서비스의 고도화를 추구할 필요가 있으며 청결성, 쾌적성, 심미성, 편의성을 고려하는 방향으로 도서관 공간을 발전시킬 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 문헌정보학 분야에서 연구된 적 없는 서비스스케이프라는 개념을 도입하여 대학도서관 이용자들의 만족도와 지속의도를 살펴보았다. 이를 통해 LibQUAL+의 장소로서의 도서관을 측정하는데 있어 보다 세밀한 분석을 돕고자 하였고 공간을 기획하는 실무자에게 새로운 가이드 라인을 제공하였다는데 의의를 둔다.

Keywords

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_f0001.png 이미지

<그림 1> 연구모형

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_f0002.png 이미지

<그림 2> 검증된 연구 모형

<표 1> 서비스스케이프의 정의

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0001.png 이미지

<표 2> 서비스스케이프 관련 구성요소

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0002.png 이미지

<표 3> 심층 면담 대상자 특성

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0003.png 이미지

<표 4> 서비스스케이프 타당성 및 신뢰성 분석 결과

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0004.png 이미지

<표 5> 대학도서관 서비스스케이프와 만족도의 회귀분석 결과

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0005.png 이미지

<표 6> 이용자 만족과 이용 지속의도의 회귀분석 결과

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0006.png 이미지

<표 7> 회귀분석을 통한 가설 검증 결과

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0007.png 이미지

<표 8> 소속에 따른 만족도와 지속의도 일원분산분석

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0008.png 이미지

<표 9> 전공에 따른 만족도와 지속의도 일원분산분석

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0009.png 이미지

<표 10> 도서관 방문횟수에 따른 만족도와 지속의도 일원분산분석

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0010.png 이미지

<표 11> 지속의도 문항과 응답의 평균값

JBGRBQ_2019_v36n1_31_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. Koo, Yoo-Ri, & Ahn, Hyeon-seo (2018). The influence of servicescape experience factors on the satisfaction of visits according to the purpose of visiting traditional markets. Archives of Design Research, 31(1), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2018.02.31.1.125
  2. Kim, Young-Gab, & Chun, He-Jin (2014). Service management for food servic industry. Paju: Gyomoon.
  3. Kim, Jae-Won (2014). The influence of servicescape on customer satisfaction and loyalty, behavioral intention in airline transportation. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 26(5), 195-210.
  4. Noh, Young-Hee, & Choi, Man-Ho (2016). Library. Seoul: Chungram.
  5. Park, Ji-Hong (2017). Quality evaluation factors and continuance intention for web-based legal information services. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.057
  6. Suk, Yong-Guk (2017). Public library design based on concepts of servicescape. Graduate School of Architecture, Konkuk University.
  7. Ahn, Ju-Young (2008). A study on the servicescape design process creating the whole service experiences. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 17(6), 63-70.
  8. Won, Suk-Hee (2010). Service(2nd ed.). Seoul: Hyungseul.
  9. Lee, Bo-Ram, & Park, Ji-Hong (2011). Towards an understanding of user satisfaction and continuance intention in human-mediated service. Journal of Information Management, 42(3), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.1633/jim.2011.42.3.187
  10. Lee, So-Young (2010). Analysis on characteristics of servicescapes of public service facilities and evaluations. Jouranl of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 26(1), 55-63.
  11. Lee, In-Kyung (2012). An investigation of the applicability of mixed methods research to adapted physical education. Journal of Adapted Physical Activity & Exercise, 20(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.17006/kjapa.2012.20.4.17
  12. Lee, Hyuk-Jin, & Ryu, Jae-Sook (2007). The effect of the servicescape on users' satisfaction in theme park. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 21(2), 5-18.
  13. Chang, Yun-Keum (2014). A study of the changes in university library space and their assessment strategies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.4.229
  14. Jun, Jae-Kyoon, Park, Kyung-Sook, Choi, Yoon-Ja, & Oh, Song-Dae (2009). A comparative study on the relationship of servicescape and customer satisfaction in restaurants: Focusing on hotel and family restaurants. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 32, 58-69.
  15. Chung, Jae-Young (2012). A study on utilization method of spaces on the university libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.333
  16. Choi, Man-Ho (2017). The effect of space configuration factos of the public library upon the user satisfaction. Proceedings of the Academic Society of Global Business Administration, 1, 27-48.
  17. Peng, Peng, & Han, Jang-Il (2014). Correlations between servicescape and customer satisfaction and the impact of customer satisfaction on revisiting intention into the coffee shop. Journal of Foodservice Management, 17(2), 99-115.
  18. Heo, Jeong-Min, & Han, Hae-Ryon (2015). A servicescape elements applied to space configuration of special libraries: Focusing on corporate special libraries. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 147-152.
  19. Baker, J. (1986). The role of the environment in marketing services: The consumer perspective. The Services Challenge: Integrating for Competitive Advantage, 79-84.
  20. Baker, J., Levy, M., & Grewal D. (1992). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Academy of Marketing Science, 22(4), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394224002
  21. Bearden, W., & Teel, J. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000103
  22. Bitner, M. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600205
  23. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rational and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond: Learning disabilities. A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67-100.
  24. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600106
  25. Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of Retailing, 49(4), 48-64.
  26. Lucas, A. F. (2000). The determinants and effect of slot servicescape satisfaction in a Lasvegas casino. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.
  27. Oliver, R. (1980). A Cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  28. Reimer, A., & Kuehn, R. (2005). The impact of servicescape on quality perception. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7), 785-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510601761
  29. Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C. F, Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter, Journal of Marketing, 49(Winter), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900203
  30. Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Expectation, performance evaluation, and consumer's perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing, 52, 18-34.
  31. Westbrook, R. A., & Reilly M. D. (1983). Value-percept disparity: An alternative to the disconfirmation of expectations theory of consumer satisfaction. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 256-261.
  32. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2009). Service Marketing. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.