DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Robot Platform for Autonomous Underwater Intervention

수중 자율작업용 로봇 플랫폼 개발

  • 여태경 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양ICT연구본부) ;
  • 최현택 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양ICT연구본부) ;
  • 이윤건 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양ICT연구본부) ;
  • 채준보 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양ICT연구본부) ;
  • 이영준 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양ICT연구본부) ;
  • 김성순 (선박해양플랜트연구소 해양플랜트.에너지연구본부) ;
  • 박상현 (한양대학교 미래자동차공학과) ;
  • 이태희 (한양대학교 미래자동차공학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.20
  • Accepted : 2019.04.11
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

KRISO (Korea Research Institute of Ship & Ocean Engineering) started a project to develop the core algorithms for autonomous intervention using an underwater robot in 2017. This paper introduces the development of the robot platform for the core algorithms, which is an ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle) type with one 7-function manipulator. Before the detailed design of the robot platform, the 7E-MINI arm of the ECA Group was selected as the manipulator. It is an electrical type, with a weight of 51 kg in air (30 kg in water) and a full reach of 1.4 m. To design a platform with a small size and light weight to fit in a water tank, the medium-size manipulator was placed on the center of platform, and the structural analysis of the body frame was conducted by ABAQUS. The robot had an IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit), a DVL (Doppler Velocity Log), and a depth sensor for measuring the underwater position and attitude. To control the robot motion, eight thrusters were installed, four for vertical and the rest for horizontal motion. The operation system was composed of an on-board control station and operation S/W. The former included devices such as a 300 VDC power supplier, Fiber-Optic (F/O) to Ethernet communication converter, and main control PC. The latter was developed using an ROS (Robot Operation System) based on Linux. The basic performance of the manufactured robot platform was verified through a water tank test, where the robot was manually operated using a joystick, and the robot motion and attitude variation that resulted from the manipulator movement were closely observed.

Keywords

References

  1. Christ RD., Werinli RL., 2007. The ROV Manual: A User Guide for Observation-Class Remotely Operated Vehicles. Published by Elsevier.
  2. Haugalokken, B.O.A., Jorgensen, E.K., Schjolberg, I., 2018. Experimental Validation of End-effector Stabilization for Underwater Vehicle-manipulator Systems in Subsea Operations. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 109, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.08.007
  3. Lee, YJ., Lee, YG., Chae, JB., Choi, HT., Yeu, TK., 2018. Development of Underwater Laser Scanner with Efficient and Flexible Installation for Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. Journal of Ocean Engineering Technology, 32(6), 511-517. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.32.6.511
  4. Mohan, S., Kim, J.H., 2015. Coordinated Motion Control in Task Space of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle-manipulator System. Ocean Engineering, 104, 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.011
  5. Ridao, P., Carreras, M., Ribas, D., Sanz, PJ., Oliver, G., 2014. Intervention AUVs: The Next Challenge. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control, Cape Town, South Africa. 12146-12159.
  6. Ridolfi, A., Conti, R., Costanzi, R., Fanelli, F., Meli, E., 2015. A Dynamic Manipulation Strategy for an Intervention: Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. Advances in Robotics & Automation, 4(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9695.1000132
  7. Simetti, E., Casalino, G., Wanderlingh, F., Aicardi, M., 2018. Task Priority Control of Underwater Intervention Systems: Theory and Applications. Ocean Engineering, 164, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.026
  8. Sivcev, S., Coleman, J., Omerdic, E., Dooly, G., Toal, D., 2018. Underwater Manipulator: A Review. Ocean Engineering, 163, 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.018