DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Instructional System and Curriculum Design to Evolve the Software Education in Elementary School

초등학교 소프트웨어교육의 교육과정 개선을 위한 내용체계 및 교과 편성의 설계에 대한 연구

  • Park, Phanwoo (Dept. of Computer Education, Daegu National University of Education) ;
  • Shin, Seungki (Institute of Global Education for the Advancement fo Innovative Learning, Daegu National University of Education)
  • 박판우 (대구교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 신승기 (대구교육대학교 글로벌교육혁신연구소)
  • Received : 2019.06.24
  • Accepted : 2019.06.27
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

In this study, we have look through the national progress of computer science education in South Korea and analyzed the main subjects and contents of each period. We suggests the ways to evolve the current computer science education in terms of class hours for computer science education, hierarchical instructions, and the limitation of current national curriculum. In South Korea, it has been leaded the computer science education in the world since the it was promoted in earnest since 1995. Based on the recently revised national curriculum, South Korean government are taking efforts to nurture a leader through computer science education in terms of the students' future skills. However, it should be promoted to strengthen the ability of not only problem-solving ability through programming education, but also balanced computing and digital literacy through enhancing the ICT skills. In order to improve the curriculum of computer science education in elementary school of South Korea, a sufficient class hours of computer science education should be secured first.

본 연구에서는 우리나라의 컴퓨터교육의 국가적인 추진 경과를 분석하여 시기별 추진 주체와 주요 내용에 대한 분석을 실시하였다. 이를 토대로 2015개정교육과정을 통해 적용되고 있는 소프트웨어교육의 제한점과 차기교육과정 개정 논의에서 반영되어야할 시수와 내용체계를 비롯하여 교수학습내용의 위계를 구성하는 방안을 제시하고 있다. 우리나라의 경우 사실상 1995년부터 본격적인 컴퓨터교육이 추진되었다는 점에서 세계적으로 선도적으로 시행되었다고 할 수 있으며, 최근 개정된 교육과정을 기반으로 컴퓨터교육을 통한 미래인재를 양성하기 위한 노력을 통해 교육에서의 선도적인 역할을 수행하기 위한 노력을 경주하고 있다. 다만, 프로그래밍 교육을 통한 문제해결력 신장뿐만 아니라 컴퓨팅에 대한 소양능력을 강화하여 균형있는 컴퓨터교육의 역량이 강화될 수 있도록 추진되어야 하며, 이를 위한 충분한 시수가 확보되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeong, Y. et. al. (2015). A Development of the Software Education Curriculum Model for Elementary Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 467-480. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.467
  2. KERIS (2000). A public hearing materials book on how to strengthen the use of ICT in elementary and secondary school. RM 2000-1.
  3. Kim, C. et. al. (2016). Development of Standard Model of Curriculum for Information Education. Korean Association of Information Education.
  4. Kim, G. et. al. (2017). Study on the Development of Information Curriculum. CRC 2015-17. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  5. Kim, H. et al. (2017). Level and Implications of Educational Informatization in Korea through OECD PISA 2015. KERIS Issue Report.
  6. Kim, J. (2017). Elementary and Secondary School ICT Instructional Guideline, what did it include? Retrieved from http://www.ciobiz.co.kr/news/article.html?id=20170718120016
  7. Ministry of Education, Korea (1987). The 5th national curriculum.
  8. Ministry of Education, Korea (1992). The 6th national curriculum.
  9. Ministry of Education, Korea (1997). The 7th national curriculum.
  10. Ministry of Education, Korea (2000). A commentary of Instructional Guideline for ICT education.
  11. Ministry of Education, Korea (2000). Computer education essentialization plan from the first grade of elementary school. Press releases from Ministry of Education.
  12. Ministry of Education, Korea (2000). Instructional Guideline for ICT education.
  13. Ministry of Education, Korea (2005). Revised Instructional Guideline for ICT education.
  14. Ministry of Education, Korea (2007). 2007 Revised National Curriculum.
  15. Ministry of Education, Korea (2008). A Plan for Maintenance of Public School about National Guideline
  16. Ministry of Education, Korea (2009). 2009 Revised National Curriculum.
  17. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Elementary School Curriculum. #2015-74 (Annex 2).
  18. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Informatics Curriculum. #2015-74 (Annex 10).
  19. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Pratical Arts(Technology and Home Econmomics) Curriculum. #2015-74 (Annex 10).
  20. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Software Education Instructional Guidance.
  21. Ministry of Education, Korea and Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2015). Report of 2015 Revision Curriculum Review in 2nd Public Hearing.
  22. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, and National Information Society Agency(2016). The Survey of Digital Divide.
  23. Shin, S. and Bae, Y. (2015). A Study on the Hierarchical Instructional System Design of Software Education by School System. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 533-544. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.533

Cited by

  1. Computational Thinking 기반의 인공지능교육 프레임워크 및 인지적학습환경 설계 vol.23, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.639
  2. 초등학교 소프트웨어 교육 내용 선정의 준거 고찰 vol.23, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.689
  3. 노벨 엔지니어링이 창의적 문제해결력 향상에 미치는 효과 vol.18, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2020.18.3.083